Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Review of Marketing Science

CiteScore 2018: 0.12

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.114
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.070

See all formats and pricing
More options …

Unauthorized Use of Famous Brands and Its Impact on Brand Equity Dimensions

Washington MacíasORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2742-5132 / Julio Cerviño
Published Online: 2019-06-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/roms-2019-0005


The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of unauthorized use of famous brand names on their brand equity dimensions. In addition, we explored the moderation effect of similarity between the unauthorized brand (junior brand) and the famous brand. An experimental design with four real famous brands and sixteen fictitious junior brands was applied to 617 undergraduate students from a large university in Ecuador. Hypotheses about the effect on brand equity dimensions and overall brand equity construct were tested using structural equation models. Results showed that awareness of a famous brand was not diluted by consumers’ exposure to junior brands. However, associations, perceived quality, loyalty and an overall construct of brand equity were diluted. There was evidence that similarity between famous and junior brands attenuated dilution. Therefore, considering that brand equity dimensions have desirable consequences on consumer behavior and firm value, this paper’s results highlight the importance of protecting brands against unauthorized use.

Keywords: trademark dilution; consumer-based brand equity; similarity; familiarity


  • Aaker, D. 1991. Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

  • Aguinis, H. 1995. “Statistical Power with Moderated Multiple Regression in Management Research.” Journal of Management 21 (6): 1141–58. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Alba, J. W., and J. W. Hutchinson. 1987. “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise.” Journal of Consumer Research 13 (4): 411–54. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Anderson, J. 1983. The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Andrews, D. W., and M. Buchinsky. 2002. “On the Number of Bootstrap Repetitions for BC a Confidence Intervals.” Econometric Theory 18 (4): 962–84. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ansary, A., and N. Hashim. 2018. “Brand Image and Equity: The Mediating Role of Brand Equity Drivers and Moderating Effects of Product Type and Word of Mouth.” Review of Managerial Science 12 (4): 969–1002. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Arbuckle, J. 2013. IBM® SPSS® Amos™ 22 User’s Guide. Chicago: IBM.Google Scholar

  • Bagozzi, R. P., and Y. Yi. 1989. “On the Use of Structural Equation Models in Experimental Designs.” Journal of Marketing Research 26 (3): 271–84. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beebe, B., and J. C. Fromer. 2018. “Are We Running Out of Trademarks? An Empirical Study of Trademark Depletion and Congestion.” Harvard Law Review 131 (4): 945–1045.Google Scholar

  • Bhat, S., and S. K. Reddy. 2001. “The Impact of Parent Brand Attribute Associations and Affect on Brand Extension Evaluation.” Journal of Business Research 53 (3): 111–22. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blunch, N. 2012. Introduction to Structural Equation Modelling Using IBM SPSS Statistics and AMOS. New Delhi: SAGE.Google Scholar

  • Brauneis, R., and P. Heald. 2011. “Trademark Infringement, Trademark Dilution, and the Decline in Sharing of Famous Brand Names: An Introduction and Empirical Study.” Buffalo Law Review 59: 141. Retrieved from http://buffalolaw.org/past_issues/59_1/Brauneis.pdf.

  • Brooks, J. “Sainsbury’s Settles Pimm’s ‘Copycat’ Claim with Change to Pitchers Bottle” PackagingNews. Accessed May 3, 2019. https://www.packagingnews.co.uk/news/business/sainsburys-settles-pimms-copycat-claim-with-change-to-pitchers-bottle-02-10-2009.

  • Buil, I., L. de Chernatony, and E. Martinez. 2008. “A Cross-National Validation of the Consumer-Based Brand Equity Scale.” Journal of Product & Brand Management 17 (6): 384–92. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buil, I., E. Martínez, and L. De Chernatony. 2013. “The Influence of Brand Equity on Consumer Responses.” Journal of Consumer Marketing 30 (1): 62–74. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Burke, R., and T. Srull. 1988. “Competitive Interference and Consumer Memory for Advertising.” Journal of Consumer Research 15 (1): 55–68. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Calder, B., L. Phillips, and A. Tybout. 1981. “Designing Research for Application.” Journal of Consumer Research 8 (2): 197–207. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell, M., and K. Keller. 2003. “Brand Familiarity and Advertising Repetition Effects.” Journal of Consumer Research 30 (2): 292–304. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Choy, M., and J. Kim. 2013. “New Brands Diluting the Personality of Existing Brands.” Journal of Brand Management 20 (7): 590–607. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Christodoulides, G., and L. De Chernatony. 2010. “Consumer-Based Brand Equity Conceptualization and Measurement: A Literature Review.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 52 (1): 43–66. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cian, L., A. Krishna, and N. Schwarz. 2015. “Positioning Rationality and Emotion: Rationality Is up and Emotion Is Down.” Journal of Consumer Research 42 (4): 632–51. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davcik, N. S., R. Vinhas da Silva, and J. F. Hair. 2015. “Towards a Unified Theory of Brand Equity: Conceptualizations, Taxonomy and Avenues for Future Research.” Journal of Product & Brand Management 24 (1): 3–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dworkowitz, A. 2011. “Ending Dilution Doublespeak: Reviving the Concept of Economic Harm in the Dilution Action.” Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal 20: 25–65. Retrieved from http://www.tiplj.org/wp-content/uploads/Volumes/v20/v20p25.pdf.

  • Esch, F., T. Langner, B. Schmitt, and P. Geus. 2006. “Are Brands Forever? How Brand Knowledge and Relationships Affect Current and Future Purchases.” Journal of Product & Brand Management 15 (2): 98–105. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Farquhar, P. 1989. “Managing Brand Equity.” Marketing Research 1 (3): 24–33. Retrieved from https://archive.ama.org/archive/ResourceLibrary/MarketingResearch/Pages/1989/1/3/6896052.aspx.

  • Fornell, C., and D. F. Larcker. 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.” Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1): 39–50. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • French, A., and G. Smith. 2013. “Measuring Brand Association Strength: A Consumer Based Brand Equity Approach.” European Journal of Marketing 47 (8): 1356–67. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grime, I., A. Diamantopoulos, and G. Smith. 2002. “Consumer Evaluations of Extensions and Their Effects on the Core Brand: Key Issues and Research Propositions.” European Journal of Marketing 36 (11/12): 1415–38. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hair, J., W. Black, B. Babin, and R. Anderson. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

  • Hartmann, W. 2005. “Resampling Methods in Structural Equation Modeling.” In Contemporary Psychometrics, edited by A. Maydeu-Olivares, and J. McArdle, 341–76. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

  • Homburg, C., M. Klarmann, and J. Schmitt. 2010. “Brand Awareness in Business Markets: When Is It Related to Firm Performance?” International Journal of Research in Marketing 27 (3): 201–12. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Humphreys, M. S., G. Tehan, A. O’Shea, and S. W. Bolland. 2000. “Target Similarity Effects: Support for the Parallel Distributed Processing Assumptions.” Memory & Cognition 28 (5): 798–811. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Iglesias, O., J. J. Singh, and J. M. Batista-Foguet. 2011. “The Role of Brand Experience and Affective Commitment in Determining Brand Loyalty.” Journal of Brand Management 18 (8): 570–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jacoby, J. 2008. “Considering the Who, What, When, Where and How of Measuring Dilution.” The Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal 24: 601–39. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://scholar.google.es/&httpsredir=1&article=1459&context=chtlj.

  • Jacoby, J., J. C. Olson, and R. A. Haddock. 1971. “Price, Brand Name, and Product Composition Characteristics as Determinants of Perceived Quality.” Journal of Applied Psychology 55 (6): 570. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Keller, K. L. 1993. “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity.” The Journal of Marketing 57 (1): 1–22. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kent, R. J., and C. T. Allen. 1994. “Competitive Interference Effects in Consumer Memory for Advertising: The Role of Brand Familiarity.” The Journal of Marketing 58 (3): 97–105. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lindell, M. K., and D. J. Whitney. 2001. “Accounting for Common Method Variance in Cross-Sectional Research Designs.” Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (1): 114–21. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Loken, B., and D. R. John. 2010. “When Do Bad Things Happen to Good Brands? Understanding Internal and External Sources of Brand Dilution.” In Brands and Brand Management: Contemporary Research Perspective, edited by B. Loken, R. Ahluwalia, and M. Houston, 233–70. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

  • Macías, W., and J. Cerviño. 2017a. “Trademark Dilution and Its Practical Effect on Purchase Decision.” Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC 21 (1): 1–13. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Macías, W., and J. Cerviño. 2017b. “Trademark Dilution: Comparing the Effects of Blurring and Tarnishment Cases over Brand Equity.” Management & Marketing 12 (3): 346–60. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Malhotra, N. K., S. S. Kim, and A. Patil. 2006. “Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and A Reanalysis of past Research.” Management Science 52 (12): 1865–83. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morrin, M. 1999. “The Impact of Brand Extensions on Parent Brand Memory Structures and Retrieval Processes.” Journal of Marketing Research 36 (4): 517–25. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morrin, M., and J. Jacoby. 2000. “Trademark Dilution: Empirical Measures for an Elusive Concept.” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 19 (2): 265–76. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morrin, M., J. Lee, and G. M. Allenby. 2006. “Determinants of Trademark Dilution.” Journal of Consumer Research 33 (2): 248–57. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Murphy, P., and B. Enis. 1986. “Classifying Products Strategically.” The Journal of Marketing 50 (3): 24–42. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Netemeyer, R., B. Krishnan, C. Pullig, G. Wang, M. Yagci, D. Dean, … F. Wirth. 2004. “Developing and Validating Measures of Facets of Customer-Based Brand Equity.” Journal of Business Research 57 (2): 209–24. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nevitt, J., and G. Hancock. 2001. “Performance of Bootstrapping Approaches to Model Test Statistics and Parameter Standard Error Estimation in Structural Equation Modeling.” Structural Equation Modeling 8 (3): 353–77. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oliver, R. 1999. “Whence Consumer Loyalty?” The Journal of Marketing 63 (4): 33–44. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peterson, R., and D. Merunka. 2014. “Convenience Samples of College Students and Research Reproducibility.” Journal of Business Research 67 (5): 1035–41. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peterson, R., K. Smith, and P. Zerrillo. 1999. “Trademark Dilution and the Practice of Marketing.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 27 (2): 255–68. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pullig, C., C. Simmons, and R. Netemeyer. 2006. “Brand Dilution: When Do New Brands Hurt Existing Brands?” Journal of Marketing 70 (2): 52–66. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reinholtz, N., D. Bartels, and J. Parker. 2015. “On the Mental Accounting of Restricted-Use Funds: How Gift Cards Change What People Purchase.” Journal of Consumer Research 42 (4): 596–614. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schumacker, R., and R. Lomax. 2004. A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. Mahwah: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

  • Simonson, A. 1993. “How and When Do Trademarks Dilute? a Behavioral Framework to Judge ´Likelihood´ of Dilution.” The Trademark Reporter 83 (2): 149–74. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/thetmr83&div=23&id=&page.

  • Srinivasan, S., and D. Hanssens. 2009. “Marketing and Firm Value: Metrics, Methods, Findings, and Future Directions.” Journal of Marketing Research 46 (3): 293–312. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Teichert, T., and K. Schöntag. 2010. “Exploring Consumer Knowledge Structures Using Associative Network Analysis.” Psychology & Marketing 27 (4): 369–98. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tushnet, R. 2008. “Gone in Sixty Milliseconds: Trademark Law and Cognitive Science.” Texas Law Review 86 (3): 507–68. Retrieved from https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/792/.

  • Van Horen, F., and R. Pieters. 2012. “Consumer Evaluation of Copycat Brands: The Effect of Imitation Type.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 29 (3): 246–55. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Horen, F., and R. Pieters. 2017. “Out-of-Category Brand Imitation: Product Categorization Determines Copycat Evaluation.” Journal of Consumer Research 44 (4): 816–32. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Williams, L., N. Hartman, and F. Cavazotte. 2010. “Method Variance and Marker Variables: A Review and Comprehensive CFA Marker Technique.” Organizational Research Methods 13 (3): 477–514. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yoo, B., and N. Donthu. 2001. “Developing and Validating a Multidimensional Consumer-Based Brand Equity Scale.” Journal of Business Research 52 (1): 1–14. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yoo, B., N. Donthu, and S. Lee. 2000. “An Examination of Selected Marketing Mix Elements and Brand Equity.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28 (2): 195–211. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yuan, K., and P. Bentler. 1997. “Improving Parameter Tests in Covariance Structure Analysis.” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 26 (2): 177–98. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zeithaml, V. 1988. “Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of the Evidence.” Journal of Marketing 52 (3): 2–22. .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2019-06-12

Published in Print: 2019-06-26

Citation Information: Review of Marketing Science, Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 1–24, ISSN (Online) 1546-5616, ISSN (Print) 2194-5985, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/roms-2019-0005.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in