Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica

The Journal of Czech University of Life Sciences Prague

4 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.78

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.398
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.688

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Evaluation Of Slender Spindle Form In Young ‘Topaz’ Apple Orchard*

M. Mészáros / J. Sus / L. Laňar / J. Náměstek
Published Online: 2015-12-30 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sab-2015-0032


Two growing systems were compared – slender spindle and modified slender spindle, supplemented with or without additional summer pruning. The trial was carried out in orchard of the apple variety ‘Topaz’ in years 2012–2014. The assessed parameters were: trunk cross sectional area (TCSA), crown volume, number of cuts, dry matter weight of pruned wood, cumulative yield, yield efficiency, and relative occurrence of size classes of fruits. The objective was to confirm the hypothesized advantages of modified slender spindle in the period of increasing yields. Based on statistical analysis there was no significant difference among systems in growth measured by TCSA. Increase in crown cubage was the highest on slender spindle with additional summer pruning. The lowest increase of crown cubage was on modified spindle without summer pruning. Number of winter cuts and similarly dry weight was significantly higher on the modified spindle only in 2013. Additional summer pruning influenced both the above-mentioned parameters. There were no significant differences in cumulative yield and yield efficiency between systems. Similarly, the difference in the occurrence of various fruit size classes was not significant. We conclude that study needs to be extended in order to confirm the suggested trends.

Keywords: Malus; pruning; woody biomass; growth; yield


  • Barden JA, Marini RP (1984): Summer and dormant pruning of apple – a four year summary. Acta Horticulturae, 146, 263–268.Google Scholar

  • Bound SA, Summers CR (2001): The effect of pruning level and timing on fruit quality in red ’Fuji’ apple. Acta Horticulturae, 557, 295–302.Google Scholar

  • Buler Z, Mika A (2009): The influence of canopy architecture on light interception and distribution in ‘Sampion’ apple trees. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, 17, 45–52.Google Scholar

  • Dallabetta N (2014): The implication of different pruning methods on apple training systems. Agriculture and Forestry, 60, 173–179.Google Scholar

  • De Wit J (2008): ‘Klik’ pruning. Sad Nowoczesny, 34, 10–12. (in Polish)Google Scholar

  • Guerra M, Casquero PA (2010): Summer pruning: an ecological alternative to postharvest calcium treatment to improve storability of high quality apple cv. ‘Reinette du Canada’. Food Science and Technology International, 16, 343–350. doi: 10.1177/1082013210366977.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996): R: A language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 5, 299–314. doi: 10.2307/1390807.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Li KT, Lakso AN, Piccioni R, Robinson T (2003): Summer pruning effects on fruit size, fruit quality, return bloom and fine root survival in apple trees. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 78, 755–761.Google Scholar

  • Mohammadi A, Mahmoudi MJ, Rezaee R (2013): Vegetative and reproductive responses of some apple cultivars (Malus domestica Borkh.) to heading back pruning. International Journal of AgriScience, 3, 628–635.Google Scholar

  • Peering AM, Preston AP (1974): The effect of orchard factors on chemical composition of apple. III. Some effects of pruning and nitrogen application on ‘Cox’s Orange Pippin’ fruit. Journal of Horticultural Science, 49, 85–93.Google Scholar

  • Platon I, Zagrai L (1997): The influence of training system and pruning time on growth and apple fruiting. Acta Horticulturae, 451, 513–518.Google Scholar

  • Robinson T, Hoying SA, DeMaree A, Iungerman K, Fargion M. (2007): The evolution towards more competitive apple orchard systems in New York. New York Fruit Quarterly, 15, 3–9.Google Scholar

  • Robinson T (2011): Advances in apple culture worldwide. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 33, 37–47. doi: 10.1590/S0100-29452011000500006.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Saure M (1985): The influence of cutting time and average intensity on growth and growth performance of young apple trees. Erwerbsobstbau, 27, 169–173. (in German)Google Scholar

  • Stover E, Fargione MJ, Watkins CB, Iungerman KA (2003): Harvest management of Marshall ’McIntosh’ apples: effects of AVG, NAA, ethephon, and summer pruning on preharvest drop and fruit quality. HortScience, 38, 1093–1099.Google Scholar

  • Sus J, Prskavec K (1991): Effect of pruning on productivity of slender spindle in the period of increasing yields. Zahradnictví, 18, 161–178. (in Czech)Google Scholar

  • Sus J, Susová V, Hudský M (1997): Effect of prune on growth of trees and on amount and quality of fruits in apple slim spindle in the period of full bearing. Vědecké práce ovocnářské, 15, 79–88.Google Scholar

  • Tahir II, Johansson E, Olsson ME (2007): Improvement of quality and storability of apple cv. Aroma by adjustment of some pre-harvest conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 112,164–171. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2006.12.018.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Van der Boon J (1980): Prediction and control of bitter pit in apples. II. Control by summer pruning, fruit thinning, delayed harvesting and soil calcium dressing. Journal of Horticultural Science, 55, 313–321.Google Scholar

  • Wertheim SJ (1968): The training of the slender spindle. Proefstation voor de Fruitteelt, Wilhelminadorp.Google Scholar

  • Wertheim SJ (2005): Pruning. In: Tromp J, Webster AD, Wertheim SJ (eds): Fundamentals of temperate zone tree fruit production. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, 176–185.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2015-01-19

Accepted: 2015-07-29

Published Online: 2015-12-30

Published in Print: 2015-12-01

* Supported by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic, Project No. QJ1210104, and by the infrastructure of the Project No. CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0116.

Citation Information: Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages 167–171, ISSN (Online) 1805-9430, ISSN (Print) 1211-3174, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sab-2015-0032.

Export Citation

© 2015 M. Mészáros et al., published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Martin Mészáros, Luděk Laňar, Josef Sus, and Jan Náměstek
Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 2017, Volume 65, Number 4, Page 1241

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in