Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology

Editor-in-Chief: Sanguinetti, Guido


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.536
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.764

CiteScore 2018: 0.49

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.316
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.342

Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) 2018: 0.02

Online
ISSN
1544-6115
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 3, Issue 1

Issues

Volume 10 (2011)

Volume 9 (2010)

Volume 6 (2007)

Volume 5 (2006)

Volume 4 (2005)

Volume 2 (2003)

Volume 1 (2002)

Confidence Levels for the Comparison of Microarray Experiments

Kerby Shedden
Published Online: 2004-11-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1088

A common experimental strategy utilizing microarrays is to develop a signature of genes responding to some treatment in a model system, and then ask whether the same genes respond in an analogous way in a more natural and uncontrolled environment. In statistical terms, the question posed is whether genes score similarly on some statistical test in two independent data sets. Approaches to this problem ignoring gene/gene correlations common to all microarray data sets are known to give overstated statistical confidence levels. Permutation approaches have been proposed to give more accurate confidence levels, but can not be applied when sample sizes are small. Here we argue that the product moment correlation between test statistics in the two experiments is an ideal measure for summarizing concordance between the experiments, as confidence levels accounting for intergene correlations depend only on a single number -- the average squared correlation between gene pairs in the data set. The resulting null standard deviation is shown to vary by less than a factor of two over six distinct experimental data sets, suggesting that a universal constant may be used for this quantity. We show how a hidden assumption of the permutation approach may lead to incorrect p-values, while the analytic approach presented here is shown to be resistant to this assumption.

Keywords: Microarrays; Statistical Inference

About the article

Published Online: 2004-11-23


Citation Information: Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 1–16, ISSN (Online) 1544-6115, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1088.

Export Citation

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Rong Wu, Yali Zhai, Rork Kuick, Anthony N Karnezis, Paloma Garcia, Anum Naseem, Tom C Hu, Eric R Fearon, and Kathleen R Cho
The Journal of Pathology, 2016, Volume 240, Number 3, Page 341

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in