Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology

Editor-in-Chief: Stumpf, Michael P.H.

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 1.265
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.423
Rank 42 out of 123 in category Statistics & Probability in the 2015 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.954
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.554
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 1.061

Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) 2015: 0.06

Online
ISSN
1544-6115
See all formats and pricing

 



30,00 € / $42.00 / £23.00

Get Access to Full Text

Re-Cracking the Nucleosome Positioning Code

Mark R Segal
  • University of California, San Francisco
Published Online: 2008-04-21 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1367

Nucleosomes, the fundamental repeating subunits of all eukaryotic chromatin, are responsible for packaging DNA into chromosomes inside the cell nucleus and controlling gene expression. While it has been well established that nucleosomes exhibit higher affinity for select DNA sequences, until recently it was unclear whether such preferences exerted a significant, genome-wide effect on nucleosome positioning in vivo. This question was seemingly and recently resolved in the affirmative: a wide-ranging series of experimental and computational analyses provided extensive evidence that the instructions for wrapping DNA around nucleosomes are contained in the DNA itself. This subsequently labeled second genetic code was based on data-driven, structural, and biophysical considerations. It was subjected to an extensive suite of validation procedures, with one conclusion being that intrinsic, genome-encoded, nucleosome organization explains approximately 50% of in vivo nucleosome positioning. Here, we revisit both the nature of the underlying sequence preferences, and the performance of the proposed code. A series of new analyses, employing spectral envelope (Fourier transform) methods for assessing key sequence periodicities, classification techniques for evaluating predictive performance, and discriminatory motif finding methods for devising alternate models, are applied. The findings from the respective analyses indicate that signature dinucleotide periodicities are absent from the bulk of the high affinity nucleosome-bound sequences, and that the predictive performance of the code is modest. We conclude that further exploration of the role of sequence-based preferences in genome-wide nucleosome positioning is warranted. This work offers a methodologic counterpart to a recent, high resolution determination of nucleosome positioning that also questions the accuracy of the proposed code and, further, provides illustrations of techniques useful in assessing sequence periodicity and predictive performance.

Keywords: motifs; periodicity; prediction; ROC curve; spectral envelope


Published Online: 2008-04-21


Citation Information: Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology. Volume 7, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 1544-6115, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1367, April 2008

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
A. Stein, T. E. Takasuka, and C. K. Collings
Nucleic Acids Research, 2010, Volume 38, Number 3, Page 709

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.