Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology

Editor-in-Chief: Sanguinetti, Guido


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.536
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.764

CiteScore 2018: 0.49

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.316
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.342

Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) 2018: 0.02

Online
ISSN
1544-6115
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 7, Issue 1

Issues

Volume 10 (2011)

Volume 9 (2010)

Volume 6 (2007)

Volume 5 (2006)

Volume 4 (2005)

Volume 2 (2003)

Volume 1 (2002)

Modeling DNA Methylation in a Population of Cancer Cells

Kimberly D. Siegmund / Paul Marjoram / Darryl Shibata
Published Online: 2008-06-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1374

Little is known about how human cancers grow because direct observations are impractical. Cancers are clonal populations and the billions of cancer cells present in a visible tumor are progeny of a single transformed cell. Therefore, human cancers can be represented by somatic cell ancestral trees that start from a single transformed cell and end with billions of present day cancer cells. We use a genealogical approach to infer tumor growth from somatic trees, employing haplotype DNA methylation pattern variation, or differences between specific CpG sites or "tags," in the cancer genome. DNA methylation is an epigenetic mark that is copied, with error, during genome replication. At our tags, neutral copy errors in DNA methylation appear to occur at random, and much more frequently than sequence copy errors. To reconstruct a cancer tree, we sample and compare human colorectal genomes within small geographic regions (a cancer fragment), between fragments on the same side of the tumor, and between fragments from opposite tumor halves. The combined information on both physical distance and epigenetic distance informs our model for tumor ancestry. We use approximate Bayesian computation, a simulation-based method, to model tumor growth under a variety of evolutionary scenarios, estimating parameters that fit observed DNA methylation patterns. We conclude that methylation patterns sampled from human cancers are consistent with replication errors and certain simple cancer growth models. The inferred cancer trees are consistent with Gompertzian growth, a well-known cancer growth pattern.

Keywords: mathematical modeling; approximate Bayesian computation; Gompertzian growth

About the article

Published Online: 2008-06-22


Citation Information: Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Volume 7, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 1544-6115, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1374.

Export Citation

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Shu-Huei Hsiao, Tim H.-M. Huang, and Yu-Wei Leu
Seminars in Cancer Biology, 2009, Volume 19, Number 3, Page 198
[2]
Darryl Shibata
Molecular Pharmaceutics, 2011, Volume 8, Number 6, Page 2050
[3]
Ke Yuan, Thomas Sakoparnig, Florian Markowetz, and Niko Beerenwinkel
Genome Biology, 2015, Volume 16, Number 1, Page 36
[4]
Erkan O. Buzbas and Noah A. Rosenberg
Theoretical Population Biology, 2015, Volume 99, Page 31
[5]
Andrea Sottoriva, Louis Vermeulen, Simon Tavaré, and Philip E. Bourne
PLoS Computational Biology, 2011, Volume 7, Number 5, Page e1001132
[6]
You Jin Hong, Paul Marjoram, Darryl Shibata, Kimberly D. Siegmund, and Xiaoyu Zhang
PLoS ONE, 2010, Volume 5, Number 8, Page e12002
[7]
Nicolas Bonello, James Sampson, John Burn, Ian J. Wilson, Gail McGrown, Geoff P. Margison, Mary Thorncroft, Philip Crossbie, Andrew C. Povey, Mauro Santibanez-Koref, and Kevin Walters
Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2013, Volume 336, Page 87

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in