Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology

Editor-in-Chief: Sanguinetti, Guido


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.536
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.764

CiteScore 2018: 0.49

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.316
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.342

Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) 2017: 0.04

Online
ISSN
1544-6115
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 8, Issue 1

Issues

Volume 10 (2011)

Volume 9 (2010)

Volume 6 (2007)

Volume 5 (2006)

Volume 4 (2005)

Volume 2 (2003)

Volume 1 (2002)

Rotation Testing in Gene Set Enrichment Analysis for Small Direct Comparison Experiments

Guro Dørum / Lars Snipen / Margrete Solheim / Solve Sæbø
Published Online: 2009-07-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1418

Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) is a method for analysing gene expression data with a focus on a priori defined gene sets. The permutation test generally used in GSEA for testing the significance of gene set enrichment involves permutation of a phenotype vector and is developed for data from an indirect comparison design, i.e. unpaired data. In some studies the samples representing two phenotypes are paired, e.g. samples taken from a patient before and after treatment, or if samples representing two phenotypes are hybridised to the same two-channel array (direct comparison design). In this paper we will focus on data from direct comparison experiments, but the methods can be applied to paired data in general. For these types of data, a standard permutation test for paired data that randomly re-signs samples can be used. However, if the sample size is very small, which is often the case for a direct comparison design, a permutation test will give very imprecise estimates of the p-values. Here we propose using a rotation test rather than a permutation test for estimation of significance in GSEA of direct comparison data with a limited number of samples. Our proposed rotation test makes GSEA applicable to direct comparison data with few samples, by depending on rotations of the data instead of permutations. The rotation test is a generalisation of the permutation test, and can in addition be used on indirect comparison data and for testing significance of other types of test statistics outside the GSEA framework.

Keywords: gene set analysis; gene expression; microarray data analysis

About the article

Published Online: 2009-07-27


Citation Information: Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 1–24, ISSN (Online) 1544-6115, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1418.

Export Citation

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Di Wu and Gordon K. Smyth
Nucleic Acids Research, 2012, Volume 40, Number 17, Page e133
[2]
Philip Pallmann, Christian Ritz, and Ludwig A. Hothorn
Statistics in Medicine, 2018
[3]
Kristian Hovde Liland
TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2011, Volume 30, Number 6, Page 827
[4]
Attila Csala, Frans P. J. M. Voorbraak, Aeilko H. Zwinderman, and Michel H. Hof
Bioinformatics, 2017
[5]
Sang Mee Lee, Baolin Wu, and John H. Kersey
Statistics in Biosciences, 2014, Volume 6, Number 1, Page 38
[7]
Shailesh Tripathi, Galina V. Glazko, and Frank Emmert-Streib
Nucleic Acids Research, 2013, Volume 41, Number 7, Page e82
[8]
Pashupati Mishra, Petri Törönen, Yrjö Leino, and Liisa Holm
Bioinformatics, 2014, Volume 30, Number 19, Page 2747
[9]
Di Wu, Elgene Lim, François Vaillant, Marie-Liesse Asselin-Labat, Jane E. Visvader, and Gordon K. Smyth
Bioinformatics, 2010, Volume 26, Number 17, Page 2176
[10]
Yun Zhang, David J. Topham, Juilee Thakar, and Xing Qiu
Bioinformatics, 2017, Volume 33, Number 13, Page 1944
[12]
Ilya N. Kotov, Ellen Siebring-van Olst, Philip A. Knobel, Ida H. van der Meulen-Muileman, Emanuela Felley-Bosco, Victor W. van Beusechem, Egbert F. Smit, Rolf A. Stahel, and Thomas M. Marti
Molecular Oncology, 2014, Volume 8, Number 8, Page 1747
[13]
Winston A. Haynes, Roger Higdon, Larissa Stanberry, Dwayne Collins, Eugene Kolker, and Richard Bonneau
PLoS Computational Biology, 2013, Volume 9, Number 3, Page e1002967
[14]
Ryan M. McAdams, Ronald J. McPherson, Richard P. Beyer, Theo K. Bammler, Frederico M. Farin, Sandra E. Juul, and Barbara Bardoni
PLOS ONE, 2015, Volume 10, Number 4, Page e0123047
[15]
Guro Dørum, Lars Snipen, Margrete Solheim, and Solve Saebø
Biometrical Journal, 2014, Volume 56, Number 6, Page 1055
[16]
Guo-Chun Ding, Kornelia Smalla, Holger Heuer, and Siegfried Kropf
Biometrical Journal, 2012, Volume 54, Number 1, Page 94

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in