Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

SATS

Northern European Journal of Philosophy

Editor-in-Chief: Addis, Mark / Hämäläinen, Nora / Pedersen, Esther Oluffa / Westphal, Kenneth R.

Managing Editor: Pedersen, Esther Oluffa

Together with Niknam, Arman Teymouri


CiteScore 2017: 0.07

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.107
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.274

Online
ISSN
1869-7577
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 8, Issue 1

Issues

A Logical Response to Blackburn's Supervenience Argument

Jorn Sonderholm
Published Online: 2010-03-16 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/SATS.2007.178

Abstract

Simon Blackburn's supervenience argument against moral realism has been widely discussed since its first appearance more than thirty years ago. A number of different suggestions have been made as to how the argument can be countered. In a review of Blackburn's Spreading the Word, Crispin Wright comments on the argument and rather briefly points out some technical difficulties with it that arise from the formula used in the definition of supervenience. In this paper, I try to show, building on Wright's criticism and taking a number of new objections into consideration, that the Moorean realist can meet Blackburn's explanatory charge.

About the article

Published Online: 2010-03-16

Published in Print: 2007-05-01


Citation Information: SATS, Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 178–185, ISSN (Online) 1869-7577, ISSN (Print) 1600-1974, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/SATS.2007.178.

Export Citation

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in