Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

SATS

Northern European Journal of Philosophy

Editor-in-Chief: Addis, Mark / Hämäläinen, Nora / Pedersen, Esther Oluffa / Westphal, Kenneth R.

Managing Editor: Pedersen, Esther Oluffa

Together with Niknam, Arman Teymouri

2 Issues per year


CiteScore 2017: 0.07

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.107
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.274

Online
ISSN
1869-7577
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Plato, Socrates, and the Politics of Meta-Aggression

J. Mikael Olsson
Published Online: 2013-12-03 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sats-2013-0006

Abstract

The argument is that if we assume a non-cognitivist outlook in metaethics then we should also adopt a way of reading classics in political philosophy that focuses on moral knowledge and its link to political authority. By distinguishing between Plato and Socrates on these matters we are provided with two ideal types that may serve as useful models when clarifying past and present controversies over one of the most important questions in political philosophy: the justifiability (or non-justifiability) of majority rule. As a by-product of the discussion of Plato and Socrates a path to an interesting defence of majority rule based on non-cognitivism will become visible.

Keywords: Plato; Socrates; metaethics; democracy

About the article

Published Online: 2013-12-03

Published in Print: 2013-12-01


Citation Information: SATS, Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 103–118, ISSN (Online) 1869-7577, ISSN (Print) 1600-1974, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sats-2013-0006.

Export Citation

© 2013 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co..Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in