Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Studies in Business and Economics

3 Issues per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2344-5416
See all formats and pricing

Do CSR Practices Of Banks In Mauritius Lead To Satisfaction And Loyalty?

Vidisha Gunesh Ramlugun
  • Faculty of Law and Management, University of Mauritius
/ Wendy Geraldine Raboute
  • Faculty of Law and Management, University of Mauritius
Published Online: 2015-09-25 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sbe-2015-0025

Abstract

This study aims to determine how CSR activities of banks in Mauritius impact on customers’ satisfaction and loyalty towards banks. A stakeholder approach to CSR and Carroll’s (1991) four part definition was adopted, which included economic, legal, ethical and philanthropic corporate social responsibilities. A three- section questionnaire was used for data collection. 384 questionnaires were distributed, out of which 352 were returned. The results indicate that philanthropic CSR, economic CSR and ethical CSR, in their order of descending importance, are significant predictors of customer satisfaction and loyalty. The study shows that legal responsibilities however did not influence customer satisfaction and loyalty. The study concludes that philanthropic, economic and ethical CSR could be areas to further investigate with a view to benefit from competitive advantage in the banking sector. The study purports to contribute to existing literature by providing evidence that Carroll’s model may not be applicable in non-western context, more particularly so, in small economies. The study also advocates future research avenues.

Keywords: Mauritius; stakeholder approach; CSR; banks; satisfaction and loyalty

References

  • Abd Rahim, R., Jalaludin, F. W., & Tajuddin, K., (2011),The importance of corporate social responsibility on consumer behaviour in Malaysia, Asian Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 119-139.

  • Bhattacharya, C.B. & Sen, S., (2004), Doing better at doing good: when, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives, California Management Review, Vol. 47, No.1, pp. 9-24. [Crossref]

  • Carrigan, M. & Attalla, A., (2001), The myth of the ethical consumer - do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol.18, no.7, pp. 570-74. [Crossref]

  • Carroll, A. B., (1979), A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance, Academy of Management Review, Vol.4, no.4, pp.497-505.

  • Carroll, A. B., (1999), Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct, Business and Society, Vol.38, no. 3, pp. 268-295. [Crossref]

  • Carroll, A. B., (1991), The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders, Business Horizons, Vol.34, no.4, pp.39-48. [Crossref]

  • Castelo Branco, M., & Lima Rodriques, L., (2007), Positioning stakeholder theory within the debate on corporate social responsibility.

  • Chaudhuri, A., & Ligas, M., (2009), Consequences of value in retail markets, Journal of Retailing, Vol.85, no.3, pp. 406-419 [Crossref]

  • Cronin, J.J., Brady, M.K., Brand, R.R., Hightower, R. and Shemwell, D.J., (1997), A cross - sectional test of the effect and conceptualization of service value, Journal of Services Marketing, Vol.11, no.6, pp.375-91. [Crossref]

  • Cone Communications, 2013. Global CSR study. Boston: Echo Research.

  • Dartey-Baah, K., & Amponsah-Tawiah, K. (2011), Exploring the limits of western corporate social responsibility theories in Africa, International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol.2, no.18, pp.126-137.

  • Donaldson, T. & Preston, L. E., (1995),The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications, Academy of Management Review, Vol.20, no. 1, pp. 65-91.

  • Driver, C., & Thompson, G., (2002), Corporate governance and democracy: The stakeholder debate revisited, Journal of Management and Governance, Vol.6, no.2, pp.111-130.

  • Eldelman Insight, 2012. Edelman Trust Barometer: U.S. Financial Services and Banking Industries.

  • Faullant, R., Matzler, K., & Füller, J., (2008), The impact of satisfaction and image on loyalty: the case of Alpine ski resorts, Managing Service Quality, Vol.18, no.2, pp.163-178

  • Federation of Disabled Peoples Organisations (DPO) Mauritius, 2013. Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Mauritius.

  • Field, A. (2005): Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 2nd ed., Sage, London.

  • Flandez, R., (2013), Most Consumers Who Buy Charity-Linked Products Want Results, [Online] Available at: http://philanthropy.com/article/Most-Consumers-Who-Buy/142029/

  • Freeman, R. E., (1998), A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation, in Pincus, L. B. (Ed.), Perspectives in business ethics, McGraw-Hill, Singapore, 171-181.

  • Garriga, E., & Melé, D., (2004), Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory, Journal of business ethics, Vol. 53, no.1-2, pp.51-71. [Crossref]

  • Guchait, P., Anner, M., & Wu, L., (2011), Customer perceptions of corporate social responsibility of service firms: impact on customer attitudes and behavioral intentions.

  • Hair, J., F., Jr., Black, W., C., Babin, B., J., & Anderson, R., E., (2010): Multivariate Data Analysis 7th Ed. United States: Pearson Prentice Hall

  • Jain, A.K., Pinson, C. & Malhotra, N.K., (2007), Customer loyalty as a construct in the marketing of banking services, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol.5, no. 3, pp. 49-72.

  • Laczniak, G. R., & Murphy, P. E., (2006), Normative perspectives for ethical and socially responsible marketing, Journal of Macromarketing, Vol.26, no.2, pp.154-177.

  • Maignan, I., (2001), Consumers' perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: A cross-cultural comparison, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.30, pp.57-72. [Crossref]

  • McDonald, L. M., & Rundle-Thiele, S, (2008), Corporate social responsibility and bank customer satisfaction: a research agenda, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol.26, no.3, pp.170-182.

  • McDonald, L. M., & Lai, C. H., (2011), Impact of corporate social responsibility initiatives on Taiwanese banking customers, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol.29, no.1,pp. 50-63.

  • McWilliams, A. & Siegel, D., (2001), Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective, Academy of Management Review, Vol.26, pp.117-127.

  • Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J., (1997), Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts, Academy of management review, Vol.22, no.4,pp. 853-886.

  • Moir, L., (2001), What do we mean by corporate social responsibility? Corporate governance, Vol.1, no.2, pp.16-22.

  • Musa, R., (2005), A proposed conceptual framework of satisfaction - attitudinal loyalty - behavioral loyalty chain: exploring the moderating effect of trust, Paper presented at ANZMAC 2005 Conference: Relationship Marketing (Consumer).

  • Nareeman, A., & Hassan, Z., (2013), Customer Perceived Practice of CSR on Improving Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty, International Journal of Accounting and Business Management, Vol.1, no.1, pp.30-49.

  • Öberseder, M., Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Gruber, V., (2011), Why Don’t Consumers Care About CSR?: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Role of CSR in Consumption Decisions, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.104, no.4,pp. 449-460. [Crossref]

  • Öberseder, M., Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Murphy, P. E. (2013), CSR practices and consumer perceptions, Journal of Business Research, Vol.66no.10, pp.1839-1851 [Crossref]

  • Olson, J. & Reynolds, T. (1983), Understanding consumers’ cognitive structures: implications for advertising strategy, in Percy, L. and Woodside, A. (Eds), Advertising and Consumer Psychology, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.

  • Onlaor, W. & Rotchanakitumnuai, S., (2010), Enhancing Customer Loyalty towards Corporate Social Responsibility of Thai Mobile Service Providers, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol.40, pp. 41.

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Berry, L.L., (1988), SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality, Journal of Retailing, Vol.64, no. 1, pp.12-40.

  • Poolthong, Y., & Mandhachitara, R., (2009), Customer expectations of CSR, perceived service quality and brand effect in Thai retail banking, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 27, no.6, pp.408-427.

  • Porter, M.E. & Kramer, M.R., (2006), The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 84 no. 12, pp.78-9.

  • Raman, M., Lim, W., & Nair, S., (2012), The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer loyalty. Kajian Malaysia, Journal of Malaysian Studies, Vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 3-12.

  • Republic of Mauritius Central Statistics Office Population and vital statistics, (2013). Available from http://www.gov.mu/portal/site/cso.

  • Reverte, C., (2009), Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 88, no. 2,pp. 351-366. [Crossref]

  • Schwartz, M. S., & Carroll, A. B., (2003), Corporate social responsibility: a three-domain approach, Business Ethics Quarterly, pp.503-530. [Crossref]

  • Seibly, G., (2013), Sterling Bank's Greg Seibly on CSR and Community Banks. American Banker, 28 October.

  • Šimić, M. L., & Štimac, H., (2010), CSR: Croatian consumers’ response. Regulation and Best Practices in Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 365.

  • Tan, Y. W., & KOMARAN, R. V., (2006), Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility: An Empirical Study in Singapore; Strategic Management Policy

  • Taylor, S.A. & Baker, T.L., (1994), An assessment of the relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction in the information of consumers’ purchase intentions, Journal of Retailing, Vol.70, no. 2,pp. 163-78. [Crossref]

  • Thuy, P. N. & Le Nguyen Hau., (2010), Service personal values and customer loyalty: a study of banking services in a transitional economy, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol.28, no.6, pp.465-478.

  • United Nations Sustainable development platform Forum, available at http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?menu=203 [accessed: 25 April 2014].

  • Valor, C., (2005), Corporate social responsibility and corporate citizenship: towards corporate accountability, Business and Society Review, Vol.110, no.2, pp.191-212. [Crossref]

  • Van der Laan, S., (2009), The Role of Theory in Explaining Motivation for Corporate Social Disclosures: Voluntary Disclosures vs' Solicited' Disclosures, Australasian Accounting Business & Finance Journal, Journal 3, no. 4.

  • Visser, W., (2005), Revisiting Carroll's CSR pyramid: An African perspective. In M. Huniche & E. R. Pedersen (Eds.), Corporate citizenship in developing countries: New partnership perspectives (pp. 29-56). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.

  • Votaw, D., (1972), Genius Becomes Rare: A Comment on the Doctrine of Social Responsibility, Pt. I. California Management Review, 15(2). [Crossref]

  • Wagner, T., Lutz, R. J., & Weitz, B. A., (2009), Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions, Journal of Marketing, Vol.73, no. 6, pp.77-91. [Crossref]

  • Zeithaml, V. A., (1988), Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence, The Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52, no. 2, pp.2-22. [Crossref]

About the article

Published Online: 2015-09-25

Published in Print: 2015-08-01


Citation Information: Studies in Business and Economics, ISSN (Online) 2344-5416, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sbe-2015-0025. Export Citation

© 2015. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in