Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Studies in Business and Economics

3 Issues per year

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Change, Resistance to Change and Organizational Cynicism

Blanca Grama / Ramona Todericiu
Published Online: 2017-01-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sbe-2016-0034


Over the past decades, the focus of the scientists has shifted towards the area of organizational change. The concept has been approached from several perspectives and studied by numerous disciplines and refers to a shift or transformation of an organization, of several components of the organization or of the processes that lie within. Being in an environment characterized by competitiveness and complexity, organizations are under a constant need of change, of progress, while the aim of each change is to improve the aspects that make this happen. The dynamics of the labour force market has contributed to the creation of an environment in which organizations are permanently facing the need to implement various changes regarding their strategy, structure, processes or culture. Henceforth, the factors that can alter the implementation of change benefit from an increased focus. Understanding the reason for which some employees can resist change can have major financial implications for the organization. When considering the human resources involved in the change, nothing seems simple; most of the times things are not as they should be, and most of the employees experience a resistance to change, sometimes in the form of change-specific cynicism, a notion defined as the belief of employees that the organization in which they work lacks integrity. This paper represents the cultural adaptation of Change-Specific Cynicism Scale (a scale proposed by David J. Stanley in 1998, validated on the Canadian population), to the specifics of the Romanian population and supplies a method of evaluating change-specific cynicism for the specialized literature. Statistic results have shown that the Change-Specific Cynicism Scale has a high level of internal consistency (α=0,84) and can be used exclusively for equivalent populations. Moreover, this paper aims to approach the term organizational cynicism and its role in the context of organizational change.

Keywords: cynicism; organizational change; organizational culture

5. References

  • Abraham, R. (2000). Organizational cynicism: Bases and consequences. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 126(3).Google Scholar

  • Andersson, L. M. (1996). Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework. Human Relations, 49(11).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bartunek, J.M., Rousseau, D.M., Rudolph, J.M. & DePalma, J.A. (2006). On the receiving end: Sensemaking, emotion and assessment of an organizational change initiated by others. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42, 182-206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beer, M. and Nohria, N.,2000, Cracking the code of change. Harvard Business Review, 78, no.3, May-Jun, 133-141.Google Scholar

  • Budeanu, A, Pitariu, H. (2009). Relatia dintre increderea in management si atitudinile fata de schimbare in contextual unei achizitii internationale, Psihologia Resurselor Umane, 7, (1), 29-43.Google Scholar

  • Coch, L. şi French, J.R.P. jr., (1948), Overcoming Resistance to Change în Human Relations, nr. 2, p. 512 - 532.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cartwright, S., & Holmes, N. (2006). The meaning of work: The challenge of regaining employee engagement and reducing cynicism. Human Resource Management Review.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davis, W. D., & Gardner, W. L. (2004). Perceptions of politics and organizational cynicism: An attributional and leader-member exchange perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 15(4).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dean, J. W., Brandes, P., & Dharwadkar, R. (1998). Organizational Cynicism. Academy of Management Review, 22, 341-352.Google Scholar

  • George, J.M. & Jones, G.R. (2001). Towards a process model of individual change in organizations. Human Relations, 54, 419-444.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kiefer, T. (2005). Feeling bad: Antecedents consequences of negative emotions in ongoing change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 875-897.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Piderit, S. K. (2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 25(4).Google Scholar

  • Rafferty, A.E. & Griffin, M.A. (2008). Organizational Change. În J. Barling & C.L. Cooper (Eds.). The Sage Handbook of Organizational Behavior. Vol. 1: Micro Approaches. London: Sage Publications.pp. 603-620.Google Scholar

  • Reichers, A. E., Wanous, J. P., & Austin, J. T. (1997). Understanding and managing cynicism about organizational change. Academy of Management Executive, 11(1).Google Scholar

  • Stanley, D. J., Meyer, J. P., & Topolnytsky, L. (2005). Employee cynicism and resistance to organizational change. Journal of Business & Psychology, 19(4).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stanley, D.J., (1998), Employee Cynism About Organizational Change. Developlemt and validation of a measure. Faculty of Graduate Studies. The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, September. Google Scholar

  • Thompson, R., Joseph, K., Bailey, L., Worley, J., Wiliams, C., (2000), Organizational change: an assessement for trsut and cynicism. Office of Aviation Medicine Washington DC, DOT/FAA/AM-00/14Google Scholar

  • Waddell, D., & Sohal, A. S. (1998). Resistance: A constructive tool for change management. Management Decision, 36(8).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Cynicism about organizational change: Measurement, antecedents, and correlates. Group & Organization Management, 25(2).Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-01-23

Published in Print: 2016-12-01

Citation Information: Studies in Business and Economics, Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 47–54, ISSN (Online) 2344-5416, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sbe-2016-0034.

Export Citation

© 2016 Grama Blanca et al., published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in