Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Studies in Business and Economics

3 Issues per year

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Assessment of Passenger Satisfaction with Public Bus Transport Services: A Case Study of Lucknow City (India)

Sanjay Singh
Published Online: 2017-01-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sbe-2016-0039


The main aim of this study is threefold. First, it tries to assess the passenger satisfaction with public bus transport services in the city of Lucknow in India. Second, it tries to examine the service quality attributes that influence the passenger satisfaction. Third, it tries to evaluate the relative importance of service quality attributes to find out the priority for service quality improvements to enhance passenger satisfaction. The study is based on a survey of objective as well as subjective questions conducted between May and July 2014. Five major bus stops of Lucknow were selected for the survey. Total 148 respondents were randomly selected to elicit their overall satisfaction and factors that influence their satisfaction in the use of public bus transport services in Lucknow using a self-rated questionnaire. The collected sample of responses is subjected to principal component analysis, a statistical technique for dimensionality reduction of the dataset, and descriptive analysis. The result of theses analyses shows that passengers are mostly dissatisfied with public bus transport services in Lucknow. Using principal component analysis, five underlying factors were extracted that influenced passenger satisfaction with public bus transport services in the city. Out of these five factors, comfort and safety has the greatest impact on overall satisfaction, followed by the adequacy of capacity of public bus transport services, orderly and clean environment inside buses, elegant design of buses and bus stops, and accessibility to public bus transport services in the city. The study thus provides a direction for public bus transport administration in the city to understand the gaps that exist and try to fill them to improve its services so that passenger satisfaction can be enhanced and consequently more people can be attracted towards public bus transport.

Keywords: Public Transport; Passenger Satisfaction; Principal Component Analysis; Descriptive Analysis; Lucknow

6. References

  • Andeleeb, S., S. Haq, H. Mohmadul, and R. I. Ahmed. 2007. Reforming inner-city bus transportation in a developing country: A passenger-driven model. Journal of Public Transportation 10(1): 1-25.Google Scholar

  • Badami, Madhav G., and Murtaza Haider. 2007. An analysis of public bus transit performance in Indian cities. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 41(10): 961-981.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cattell, R. B. 1966. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1(2): 245–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Costello, A. B., and J. W. Osborne. 2005. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 10(7): 1–9.Google Scholar

  • Deb, K., and S. Sundar. 2002. Restructuring urban public transport in India. Journal of Public Transportation 5(3): 85-102.Google Scholar

  • Faulks, R. 1990. Bus provision in developing world cities. In Margaret, J.H. (ed.), Developing World of Transport. Grosvenor Press International.Google Scholar

  • Field, A. 2005. Discovering Statistics using SPSS, 2nd ed. SAGE Publication, London.Google Scholar

  • Hair, J. F., R. L. Tatham, R. E. Anderson, and W. C. Black. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, 5th ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar

  • Jolliffe, I. T. 2005. Principal Component Analysis, 2nd ed. Springer Series in Statistics. New York: Springer-Verlag New York.Google Scholar

  • Kaiser, H. F. 1960. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20(1): 141–151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

  • Nwachukwu, A. A. 2014. Assessment of passenger satisfaction with intra-city public bus transport services in Abuja, Nigeria. Journal of Public Transportation 17(1): 99-119.Google Scholar

  • Padam, S., and S. K. Singh. 2004. Urbanization and urban transport in India: the search for a policy. European Transport 27: 26-44.Google Scholar

  • Pucher, J., Z. Peng, N. Mittal, Y. Zhu, and N. Korattyswaroopam. 2007. Urban transport trends and policies in China and India: impacts of rapid economic growth. Transport Reviews 27(4): 379-410.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pucher, J., N. Korattyswaroopam, N. Mittal, and N. Ittyerah. 2005. Urban transport crisis in India. Transport Policy 12(3): 185-198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pucher, J., N. Korattyswaroopam, and N. Ittyerah. 2004. The crisis of public transport in India: overwhelming needs but limited resources. Journal of Public Transportation 7(3): 95-113.Google Scholar

  • Schipper, L., I. Banerjee, and W. Ng. 2009. Carbon dioxide emissions from land transport in India: scenarios of the uncertain. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2114: 28-37.Google Scholar

  • Singh, S. K. 2015a. Measuring quality of life for public policy: a case study of Lucknow city. International Journal of Society Systems Science 7(3): 238-254.Google Scholar

  • Singh, S. K. 2015b. Scenario of urban transport in Indian cities: challenges and the way forward. In Mahendra, D. S., and S. Yedla (ed.), Cities and Sustainability: Issues and Strategic Pathways. Springer (India) Pvt. Ltd.Google Scholar

  • Singh, S. K. 2014. An inquiry into the cost structure of state transport undertakings in India. Transport Policy 32: 1-8.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Singh, S. K. 2012. Urban transport in India: issues, challenges, and the way forward. European Transport 52(5): 1-26.Google Scholar

  • Singh, S. K. 2009. Road traffic crashes: the scourge of UP’s cities. Economic and Political Weekly 44(48): 22-24.Google Scholar

  • Singh, S. K. 2005. Review of urban transportation in India. Journal of Public Transportation 8(1): 79-97.Google Scholar

  • Singh, S. K. 2002. An analysis of economic profitability of municipal transport undertakings in India. Indian Journal of Transport Management 26(4): 535-557.Google Scholar

  • Straddling, S., M. Carreno, T. Rye, and A. Noble. 2007. Passenger perception and ideal urban bus journey experience. Transport Policy 14(4): 283-292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tiwari, G. 2002. Urban transport priorities: meeting the challenge of socio-economic diversity in cities: a case study of Delhi, India. Cities 19(2): 95-103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zwick, W. R., and W. F. Velicer. 1986. Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin 99(3): 432–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-01-23

Published in Print: 2016-12-01

Citation Information: Studies in Business and Economics, Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 107–128, ISSN (Online) 2344-5416, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sbe-2016-0039.

Export Citation

© 2016 Singh Sanjay, published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in