Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology

Editor-in-Chief: Cutter, Anthony Mark

1 Issue per year


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.218
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.431
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 1.000

Online
ISSN
1941-6008
See all formats and pricing
More options …

An Argument against Arguments for Enhancement

Michael J Selgelid
Published Online: 2008-01-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1941-6008.1008

The treatment-enhancement distinction is difficult to make, and defenders of enhancement often base their case on that. Critics of enhancement, however, often have prototypical cases of enhancement-oriented interventions in mind, and the ethics of these can be evaluated on a case by case basis. Things like intelligence enhancement may have adverse effects on equality and utility. If the equality and utility effects of such enhancements were sufficiently severe, then restrictions would be called for. We need to think more about how to make tradeoffs between liberty, equality, and utility—and we need to know more about the extent to which each of these is at stake—before reaching conclusions about the ethics of, and appropriate social policy regarding, human enhancement.

Keywords: treatment; enhancement; human enhancement; genetics; equality; liberty

About the article

Published Online: 2008-01-08


Citation Information: Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology, Volume 1, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 1941-6008, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1941-6008.1008.

Export Citation

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in