Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology

Editor-in-Chief: Cutter, Anthony Mark

More options …

Life Span Extension Research and Public Debate: Societal Considerations

Aubrey D.N.J de Grey
Published Online: 2007-12-21 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1941-6008.1011

The pace of a given strand of scientific research, whether purely curiosity-driven or motivated by a particular technological goal, is strongly influenced by public attitudes towards its value. In the case of research directed to the radical postponement of aging and the consequent extension of healthy and total lifespans, public opinion is entrenched in a "pro-aging trance" - a state of resolute irrationality. This arises from the entirely rational attitude to a grisly, inevitable and relatively far-off fate: putting it out of one's mind allows one to make the most of what time one has, free of preoccupation with one's demise, and it is immaterial how irrational the arguments that one uses to achieve this are, e.g. by persuading oneself that aging is not such a bad thing after all. As biotechnology increasingly nears the point where aging will no longer be inevitable, however, this studied fatalism has become a core part of the problem, making people reluctant to join the crusade to hasten that technology's arrival. An effective way to address this hesitation is to promote debate about the reasons people give for fearing the defeat of aging, most of which are sociological. Such debate exposes people to the glaring flaws in their own logic. Thus, the more the debate is sustained and promoted, the harder it is for those flaws to be ignored.

Keywords: life extension; human enhancement; transhumanism

About the article

Published Online: 2007-12-21

Citation Information: Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology, Volume 1, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 1941-6008, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1941-6008.1011.

Export Citation

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Carlos Sebastián and Raul Mostoslavsky
Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, 2015, Volume 43, Page 33
William MacNee, Roberto A. Rabinovich, and Gourab Choudhury
European Respiratory Journal, 2014, Volume 44, Number 5, Page 1332
Han Chen, Chunyan Li, Zhicheng Zhou, and Han Liang
Cell Systems, 2018, Volume 6, Number 5, Page 604
Abu Shufian Ishtiaq Ahmed, Matilda HC Sheng, Samiksha Wasnik, David J Baylink, and Kin-Hing William Lau
World Journal of Experimental Medicine, 2017, Volume 7, Number 1, Page 1
Florian Feldwieser, Michael Marchollek, Markus Meis, Matthias Gietzelt, and Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen
Journal of Assistive Technologies, 2016, Volume 10, Number 4, Page 178
Soon Sik Kwon, Sun Young Kim, Bong Ju Kong, Kyeong Jin Kim, Geun Young Noh, Na Ri Im, Ji Won Lim, Ji Hoon Ha, Junoh Kim, and Soo Nam Park
International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2015, Volume 483, Number 1-2, Page 26
Julian Savulescu
Journal of Medical Ethics, 2014, Volume 40, Number 2, Page 110
Avikar Periwal
Physical Review E, 2013, Volume 88, Number 5
Shirin Hasani-Ran, Somayeh Khosravi, Neda Nayebi, Bagher Larijani, and Mohammad Abdollahi
Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 2012, Volume 7, Number 8, Page 621

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in