Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology

Editor-in-Chief: Cutter, Anthony Mark

See all formats and pricing
More options …

Neuroethical Issues in Neurogenetic and Neuro-Implantation Technology: The Need for Pragmatism and Preparedness in Practice and Policy

James Giordano
Published Online: 2011-01-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1941-6008.1152

This comment responds to a remark made by Meloni et al concerning brain implants and brain-gene transfer—that we ought to give primacy to ethical issues inherent to medical utility rather than speculating on issues of potential misuse. It foregrounds the benefits, burdens and risks as well as how to validate consent to the use of such novel and uncertain techniques. It asks how legal claims would be handled in the absence of historical casuistry—constructs of responsibility and culpability for resultant harms. Finally, it confronts the practical question of how decisions about who receives state-of-the-art treatments are addressed, deliberated and articulated. Are we looking at a new “boutique neurology” or widely accessible applications requiring substantive changes in the health-economic infrastructure and better preparedness in practice and policy?

Keywords: neuroscience; neurotechnology; neuroethics; pragmatism; ethics; policy

About the article

Published Online: 2011-01-27

Citation Information: Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology, Volume 4, Issue 3, ISSN (Online) 1941-6008, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1941-6008.1152.

Export Citation

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in