Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology
Editor-in-Chief: Cutter, Anthony Mark
1 Issue per year
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.218
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.431
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 1.000
Public Perceptions and Biobanking: What Does the Research Really Say?
Collection, storage, and use of biological specimens and clinical data is a historically contentious practice, especially among certain populations. It is therefore believed that public perceptions and opinions should be considered in the exploration of ethical issues associated with biobanking. It is hoped that this research will both help to illuminate the nature and depth of the social issues and inform the development of policy responses. We collected original research articles that dealt with public perceptions of biobanking initiatives, including both quantitative and qualitative findings. The intent was to elucidate public opinion on persistent key issues, including willingness to participate, consent, incidental findings and return of results, privacy, withdrawal, and ownership and control of provided material. While a wide range of issues and perspectives were explored in the research articles, the focus of this review is on the above list of key issues. With few exceptions (e.g., return of results and withdrawal), what is disclosed by this review of survey work is a lack of consensus on key issues, especially in the context of the nature of consent required.
Supplementary Article Materials
Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.