Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Seminars in Cardiovascular Medicine

The Journal of Lithuanian Heart Association

1 Issue per year

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Early ischemic brain lesions after carotid angioplasty and stenting on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging study

Nerijus Misonis
  • Corresponding author
  • Centre of Cardiology and Angiology Vilnius University Hospital Santariškiu klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Darius Palionis
  • Centre of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vilnius University Hospital Santariškiu klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Algirdas Tamošiūnas
  • Centre of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vilnius University Hospital Santariškiu klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Vaidotas Zabulis
  • Centre of reconstructive and endovascular surgery, Vilnius University Hospital Santariškiu klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Kristina Ryliškienė
  • Centre of Neurology, Vilnius University Hospital Santariškiu klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Dalius Jatužis
  • Centre of Neurology, Vilnius University Hospital Santariškiu klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2014-01-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/semcard-2013-0003


Aim: The aim of the paper is to evaluate the appearance of the new early ischemic lesions in the brain after carotid angioplasty and stenting on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, and their relationship with clinical and procedural factors.

Methods: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) procedures performed by a single interventional cardiologist in years November 2006 to January 2013 were evaluated retrospectively. In total, 227 procedures for 211 patients (mean age 69.8 ± 8.5 years) were performed, from which 171 (75.3%) for male and 56 (24.7%) for female patients. Seventy-two (34.1%) patients had symptomatic stenosis of carotid artery. The following protection systems to avoid the distal microembolism were used during the CAS: (1) Filters: FilterWire EZ (Boston Scientific Corporation); Emboshield NAV (Abbott Vascular); SpideRX (EV3); Defender (Medtronic); FiberNet Filter (Invatec-Medtronic); (2) Occlusion MoMa Baloon System (Invatec-Medtronic). Acute ischemic damages of the brain before and after CAS procedure were diagnosed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences. Sixty-five (30.8%) patients underwent MRI test. Exact and asymptomatic χ2 criteria were applied for testing the hypothesis of inter-dependency of the symptoms.

Results: Forty-six (70.8%) patients had new ischemic foci in the brain on MRI DWI after CAS procedures. Among those patients, focal damage of the brain was diagnosed in 36 (78.3%) cases; linear damage of the brain - in 9 (19.6%) patients; ipsilateral damage of the brain - in 37 (80.4%) patients; bilateral damage of the brain - in 16 (34.8%) patients, 38 (82.6%) patients were diagnosed with forebrain damage; 4 (8.7%) patients were diagnosed with damage of brainstem; 5 (10.9%) patients were diagnosed with cerebellum damage. Clinical symptoms of brain damage were diagnosed only for 2 (4.3%) patients. Focal damage of the brain was significantly less frequent only for aortic arch type 1, if compared with aortic arch type 2 and 3: 64.3%, 93.3% and 100.0%, respectively (p < 0.05). Focal damage of the brain occurred least in patients (28.6%) with Emboshield NAV protection type, if compared to other types of protection (71.4-100.0%). Linear >10mmbrain damage was less frequent when using FilterWire EZ, Emboshield NAV and SpideRX protection type. Ipsilateral ischemic brain damage also occurred less frequent when using Emboshield NAV protection type; bilateral damage occurred less frequent when using FilterWire EZ, Emboshield NAV and SpideRX protection type. Ischemic forebrain damage was also diagnosed less often in patients for whom protection type FilterWire EZ and Emboshield NAV was applied.

Conclusions: Most frequent findings by MRI after CAS procedures were focal, ipsilateral and forebrain damage (about 80%), but less than 5% patients had clinical symptoms. In the case of aorta arch type 1 focal ischemic damage of the brain was significantly less frequent, then in aortic arch type 2 and 3. The localization and extent of brain damage was associated with the type of protection systems that have been used.

Keywords : carotid artery stenting; ischemic brain lesions; diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging

  • [1] Mead GE, Shingler H, Farrell A, O’Neill PA, McCollum CN. Carotid disease in acute stroke. Age Ageing 1998; 27:677-682.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [2] Malloy J, Markus HS. Asymptomatic embolization predicts stroke and TIA risk in patients with carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 1999; 30:1440-1443.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [3] CAVATAS Investigators. Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomized trial. Lancet 2001; 357:1729-1737.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [4] Yadav JS, Whole MH, Kuntz RE, Fayad P, Katzen BT, Mishkel GJ et al. Stenting and angioplasty with protection in patients at high risk for endarterectomy investigators. Protected carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high risk patients. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:1493-1501.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5] Henry M, Polydorou A, Klonaris C, Henry I, Polydorou AD, Hugel M. Carotid angioplasty and stenting under protection. State of the art. Minerva Cardioangiol 2007; 55:19-56.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [6] CaRESS Steering Committee. Carotid Revascularization Using Endarterectomy or Stenting Systems (CaRESS) phase I clinical trial: 1-year results. J Vasc Surg 2005; 42:213-219.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [7] Gray WA, Hopkins LN, Yadav S, Davis T, Wholey M, Atkinson R et al, for the ARCHeR Trial Collaborators.Protected carotid stenting in high-risk patients: THE ARCHeR results. J Vasc Surg 2006; 44:258-269.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [8] Kastrup A, Schulz J, Raygrotzki S, Groschel K, Ernemann U. Comparison of angioplasty and stenting with cerebral protection versus endarterectomy for treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis in elderly patients. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40:945-951.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9] Hammer FD, Lacroix V, Duprez T, Grandin C, Verhelst R, Peeters A et al. Cerebral microembolization after protected carotid artery stenting in surgical high-risk patients: Results of a 2-year prospective study. J Vasc Surg 2005; 42:847-853.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [10] Setacci C, Chisci E, de Donato G, Setacci F, Sirignano P, Galzerano G. Carotid artery stenting in a single center: are six years of experience enough to achieve the standard of care? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 34:655-662.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [11] Sadek M, Hynecek RL, Sambol EB, Ur-Rehman H, Kent KC, Faries PL. Carotid angioplasty and stenting success relies on appropriate patient selection. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47:946-951.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [12] Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B et al. EVA-3S Investicators. Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:1660-1671.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13] GrayWA, Yadav JS, Verta P, Scicli A, Fairman R,WholeyM et al. The capture registry: results of carotid stenting with embolic protection in the post approval setting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 69:341-348.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [14] Hobson RW 2nd, Howard VJ, Roubin GS et al; CREST.Credentialing of surgeons as interventionalists for carotid artery stenting: experience from the lead-in phase of CREST. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40:952-957.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [15] Sacco RL, Adams R, Alberts G, Alberts MJ, Benavente O, Furie K et al. Guidelines for prevention of stroke in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke: cosponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline. Circulation 2006; 113:409-449.Google Scholar

  • [16] Balzer JO. How to introduce carotid angioplasty without compromising patient safety? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008; 36:138-144.Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [17] Rothwell PM, Slattery J, Warlow CP. Clinical and angiographic predictors of stroke and death from carotid endarterectomy: systemic review. BMJ 1997; 315:1571-1577.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [18] Tu JV, Wang H, Bowyer B, Green L, Fang J, Kucey D et al.Google Scholar

  • Risk factors for death or stroke after carotid endarterectomy: observations from the Ontario Carotid Endarterectomy Registry. Stroke 2003; 34:2568-2573.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [19] Halm EA, Hannan EL, Rojas M et al. Clinical and operative predictors of outcomes of carotid endarterectomy.J Vasc Surg 2005; 42:420-428.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [20] McCormick DJ, Vlad T, Fasseas P. Carotid artery stenting will replace carotid endarterectomy. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 2007; 19:223-227.Google Scholar

  • [21] Jaeger HJ, Mathias KD, Drescher R et al. Diffusionweighted MR imaging after angioplasty or angioplasty plus stenting of arteries supplying the brain. Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22:1251-1259.Google Scholar

  • [22] Cosottini M, Michelassi MC, Puglioli M et al. Silent cerebral ischemia detected with diffusion-weighted imaging in patients treated with protected and unprotected carotid artery stenting. Stroke 2005; 36:2389-2393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23] Pinero P, Gonzalez A, Mayol A et al. Silent ischemia after neuroprotected percutaneous carotid stenting: a diffusion-weighted MRI study. Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27:1338-1345.Google Scholar

  • [24] Faraglia V, Palombo G, Stella N et al. Cerebral embolization in patients undergoing protected carotid-artery stenting and carotid surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2007; 48:683-688.Google Scholar

  • [25] Barbato JE, Dillavou E, Horowitz MB, Jovin TG, Kanal E, David S, Makaroun MS. A randomized trial of carotid stenting with and without cerebral protection. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47:760-765.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [26] Taha MM, Maeda M, Sakaida H et al. Cerebral ischemic lesions detected with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging after carotid artery stenting: comparison of several anti-embolic protection devices. Neurol Med Shir (Tokyo) 2009; 49:386-393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [27] Bonati LH, Jongen LM, Haller S et al. New ischemic brain lesions on MRI after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a substudy of the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS). Lancet Neurol 2010; 9:353-362.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [28] Akbulut B, Oc B, OcMet al. Diffusion-weightedmagnetic resonance imaging: comparison of outcome in carotid artery stenosis treatment with different approaches. Anatol J Clin Investig 2009; 3:4-9.Google Scholar

  • [29] Linfante I, Andreone V, Akkawi N, Wakhloo AK. Internal carotid artery stenting in patients over 80 years of age: single-center experience and review of the literature.J Neuroimaging 2009; 19:158-163.Web of SciencePubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [30] Meyer SA, Gandhi CD, Johnson DM, Winn HR, Patel AB.Outcomes of carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients with carotid artery stenosis: a single neurovascular center retrospective review of 101 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery 2010; 66:448-453; discussion 453-454.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [31] Rosenkranz M, Thomalla G, Havemeister S, Wittkugel O, Cheng B, Krützelmann A et al. Older age and greater carotid intima-media thickness predict ischemic events associated with carotid-artery stenting. Cerebrovasc Dis 2010; 30:567-572.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [32] Giannopoulos S, Katsanos AH, Vasdekis SN, Boviatsis E, Voumvourakis KI, Tsivgoulis G. Age and gender disparities in the risk of carotid revascularization procedures.Neurol Sci 2013; doi:10.1007/s10072-013-1453-2.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [33] Reichmann BL, van Lammeren GW, Moll FL, de Borst GJ.Is age of 80 years a threshold for carotid revascularization? Curr Cardiol Rev 2011; 7:15-21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [34] Dumont TM, Mokin M, Wach MM, Drummond PS, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI, Hopkins LN. Understanding risk factors for perioperative ischemic events with carotid stenting: is patient age over 80 years or is unfavorable arch anatomy to blame? J Neurointerv Surg 2013; doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010721.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [35] Sakamoto S, Kiura Y, Kajihara Y, Shibukawa M, Okazaki T, Matsushige T et al. Carotid artery stenting using the proximal or dual protection method for near occlusion of the cervical internal carotid artery. Neurosurg Rev 2013; doi:10.1007/s10143-013-0481-y.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [36] Bijuklic K, Wandler A, Varnakov Y, Tuebler T, Schofer J.Risk factors for cerebral embolization after carotid artery stenting with embolic protection: a diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging study in 837 consecutive patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6:311-316.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [37] White CJ, Ramee SR, Collins TJ, Jenkins JS, Reilly JP, Patel RA. Carotid artery stenting: Patient, lesion, and procedural characteristics that increase procedural complications.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2013; doi: 10.1002/ccd.24984.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [38] Mathias K. Carotid artery stenting with filters. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2013; 54:33-39.Google Scholar

  • [39] Kwon SM, Cheong JH, Lee SK, Park DW, Kim JM, Kim CH.Risk factors for developing large emboli following carotid artery stenting. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2013; 53:155-160.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [40] Bouziane Z, Nourissat G, Duprey A, Albertini JN, Favre JP, Barral X. Carotid artery surgery: high-risk patients or high-risk centers? Ann Vasc Surg 2012; 26:790-796.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [41] Mazzaccaro D, Occhiuto MT, Stegher S, Malacrida G, Caldana M, Tealdi DG, Nano G. Long-term results of carotid artery stenting in patients 80 years and older. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 2012; 24:49-54.Google Scholar

  • [42] Hoke M, Ljubuncic E, Steinwender C, Huber K, Minar E, Koppensteiner R et al. A validated risk score to predict outcomes after carotid stenting. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 5:841-849.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [43] Protack CD, Bakken AM, Xu J, Saad WA, Lumsden AB, Davies MG. Metabolic syndrome: A predictor of adverse outcomes after carotid revascularization. J Vasc Surg 2009; 49:1172-1180.Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [44] Trani C, Burzotta F, Coroleu SF. Transradial carotid artery stenting with proximal embolic protection. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 74:267-272. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2014-01-29

Published in Print: 2013-12-01

Citation Information: Seminars in Cardiovascular Medicine, Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 13–20, ISSN (Online) 1822-7767, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/semcard-2013-0003.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in