Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Semiotica

Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies / Revue de l'Association Internationale de Sémiotique

Editor-in-Chief: Danesi, Marcel


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.509

CiteScore 2018: 0.23

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.232
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.478

Agenzia Nazionale di Valutazione del Sistema Universitario e della Ricerca: Classe A

Online
ISSN
1613-3692
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 2006, Issue 162

Issues

Understanding and handling unreliable narratives: A pragmatic model and method

Theresa Heyd
  • Lecturer, Researcher, and PhD candidate in the Department of English Language and Linguistics at the Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf.
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2006-10-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/SEM.2006.078

Abstract

This paper explores the pragmatic foundations of unreliable narration (UN), a narrative technique highly popular in western literary texts. It sets out by giving a critique of the competing theoretic frameworks of UN, namely the seminal Boothian concept and more recent constructivist approaches. It is argued that both frameworks neglect a pragmatic perspective as the most viable way for identifying and analysing UN. Such a pragmatic model is then developed on the basis of theories of cooperation, such as the Gricean maxims, relevance theory, and politeness. The emerging definition of UN treats a narrator as unreliable if he or she violates the cooperative principle without intending an implicature. This model is tested against three prototypical UNs: Christie's The Murder of Roger Ackroyd, Ishiguro's The Remains of the Day, and Poe's The Tell-Tale Heart. These sample analyses yield a typology of UN: while pragmatic deviation is shown to be the intrinsic feature of the phenomenon, unreliable narrators vary according to their degree of intentionality. Finally, two recurring issues in the UN debate are briefly discussed: the existence of textual clues of UN, and the role of the reader in constructing unreliability.

Keywords: Unreliable narration; pragmatic deviation; maxims of conversation; cooperation; intentionality; stylistic markers

About the article

Theresa Heyd

Theresa Heyd (b. 1980). Her research interests include CMC, pragmatics, sociolinguistics, and the linguistics of literary discourse.


Published Online: 2006-10-26

Published in Print: 2006-09-01


Citation Information: Semiotica, Volume 2006, Issue 162, Pages 217–243, ISSN (Online) 1613-3692, ISSN (Print) 0037-1998, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/SEM.2006.078.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Christopher Badura and Francesco Berto
Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 2018, Page 1
[2]
Frank Zipfel
Journal of Literary Theory, 2011, Volume 5, Number 1
[3]
Jonas Koch
Journal of Literary Theory, 2011, Volume 5, Number 1
[4]
Tobias Klauk
Journal of Literary Theory, 2011, Volume 5, Number 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in