Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Semiotica

Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies / Revue de l'Association Internationale de Sémiotique

Editor-in-Chief: Danesi, Marcel

6 Issues per year


CiteScore 2017: 0.23

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.228
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.634

Agenzia Nazionale di Valutazione del Sistema Universitario e della Ricerca: Classe A

Online
ISSN
1613-3692
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 2014, Issue 198

Issues

Codes and coding: Sebeok's zoosemiotics and the dismantling of the fixed-code fallacy

Paul Cobley
Published Online: 2014-02-15 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2013-0100

Abstract

The concept of code has a long and varied history across the sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities. In the interdisciplinary field of biosemiotics it has been foundational through the idea of code duality (Hoffmeyer and Emmeche 1991); yet it has not been free from controversy and questions of definition (see, for example, Barbieri 2010). One reason why code has been so central to modern semiotics is not simply a matter of the linguistic heritage of semiology and the work of Jakobson who straddled both semiology and semiotics. Rather, it has been the programmatic reconceptualization of code that is woven through the work of modern semiotics' founder, the father of both biosemiotics and zoosemiotics, Thomas A. Sebeok. A biologist manqué, a communication theorist influenced by cybernetics, and a semiotician deriving from the “major tradition” of Peirce, arguably Sebeok's most systematic considerations of code were offered in his essays on zoosemiotics, largely from his 1963 coining of the term onwards. The present article principally revisits the 1972 collection of Sebeok's zoosemiotic essays and suggests that his particular observations in respect of analogue and digital codes and their relation to evolution in the world of animals harbors an opportunity to rethink and potentially resolve, through an ethological lens, current controversies regarding the status of code.

Keywords: code; coding; semiotics; zoosemiotics; biosemiotics; communication

About the article

Paul Cobley

Paul Cobley (b. 1963) is a professor at Middlesex University 〈p.cobley@mdx.ac.uk〉. His research interests include semiotics, communication theory, the work of Thomas A. Sebeok, and narrative. His publications include Narrative (2nd edn., 2013); Communication theories (4 vols., 2006); The Routledge companion to semiotics (2009); and Realism for the twenty-first century: A John Deely reader (2009).


Published Online: 2014-02-15

Published in Print: 2014-02-01


Citation Information: Semiotica, Volume 2014, Issue 198, Pages 33–45, ISSN (Online) 1613-3692, ISSN (Print) 0037-1998, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2013-0100.

Export Citation

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in