Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Semiotica

Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies / Revue de l'Association Internationale de Sémiotique

Editor-in-Chief: Danesi, Marcel


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.183
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.283

CiteScore 2018: 0.23

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.232
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.478

Agenzia Nazionale di Valutazione del Sistema Universitario e della Ricerca: Classe A

Online
ISSN
1613-3692
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 2015, Issue 207

Issues

Heidegger and the signs of history

Jonathan Hope
Published Online: 2015-07-15 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0048

Abstract

Heidegger’s conception of the sign formulated in Sein und Zeit (1996 [1927]) may shed some light on his disastrous, philosophical and political experience with Nazism. In order to show this, I propose to assess how Heidegger establishes the relationship between signs and history in his magnum opus. Then, relying on the fact – central to Heidegger’s thinking, and to sign studies in general – that ideas are linked to the world, I will proceed to examine how Heidegger’s philosophical meditations stand up to his real-life engagements. My final remarks, more interrogative than declarative, will raise the question as to how Heidegger was lured into believing that Nazism represented a moment of truth.

Keywords: Heidegger; Sein und Zeit; sign studies; history

References

  • Barash, Jeffrey. 1988. Martin Heidegger and the problem of historical meaning. Bronx: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar

  • Beistegui, Miguel de. 1998. Heidegger and the political dystopias. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Brohm, Jean-Marie, Roger Dadoun & Fabien Ollier. 2007. Heidegger, le berger du néant. Critique d’une pensée politique. Paris: Éditions Homnisphères.Google Scholar

  • Cobley, Paul & Anti Randviir. 2009. Introduction: What is sociosemiotics? Semiotica 173(1/4). 1–39.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dastur, Françoise. 1990. Heidegger et la question du temps. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar

  • Farías, Victor. 1987. Heidegger et le nazisme. Paris: Verdier.Google Scholar

  • Faye, Emmanuel. 2005. Heidegger, l’introduction du nazisme dans la philosophie. Autour des séminaires inédits de 1933–1935. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar

  • Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The end of history and the last man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1996 [1927]. Being and time, Joan Stambaugh (trans.). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1991 [1933]. The self-assertion of the German university, William Lewis (trans.). In Richard Wolin (ed.), The Heidegger controversy: A critical reader, 29–39. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1985 [1945]. The rectorate 1933/34: Facts and thoughts , Karsten Harries (trans.). Review of Metaphysics 38(3). 467–502.Google Scholar

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1991 [1945]. Letter to the rector of Freiburg university, November 4, 1945, Richard Wolin (trans.). In Richard Wolin (ed.), The Heidegger controversy: A critical reader, 61–66. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

  • Heidegger, Martin. 2002 [1945]. Heidegger on the art of teaching, Valerie Allen & Ares Axiotis (trans. & ed.). In Michael Peters (ed.), Heidegger, education, and modernity, 27–45. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1988 [1946]. Letter on humanism, Frank Capuzzi (trans.). In William McNeill (ed.), Pathmarks, 239–276. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1993 [1966]. Only a God can save us. Der Spiegel’s interview with Martin Heidegger, Maria Alter & John Caputo (trans.). In Richard Wolin (ed.), The Heidegger controversy: A critical reader, 91–116. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hope, Jonathan. 2014. The sign in Heidegger’s Sein und Zeit. Semiotica 202(1/4). 259–271.Google Scholar

  • Jolivet, Servanne. 2009. Heidegger. Le sens de l’histoire (1912–1927). Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar

  • Raffoul, François. 2011. Heidegger and the aporia of history . Poligrafi 16(61–62). 91–118.Google Scholar

  • Wolin, Richard. 1990. The politics of being: The political thought of Martin Heidegger. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

  • Žižek, Slavoj. 1999. The ticklish subject: The absent center of political ontology. London: Verso.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-07-15

Published in Print: 2015-10-01


Citation Information: Semiotica, Volume 2015, Issue 207, Pages 567–581, ISSN (Online) 1613-3692, ISSN (Print) 0037-1998, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0048.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in