Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Semiotica

Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies / Revue de l'Association Internationale de Sémiotique

Editor-in-Chief: Danesi, Marcel

6 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.32

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.240
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.819

Online
ISSN
1613-3692
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 2016, Issue 213

Issues

Semiotics and education, semioethic perspectives

Susan Petrilli
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Lettere, Lingue, Arti, Italianistica e Culture Comparate, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Via Garruba 6, Bari, Puglia 70122, Italy
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2016-08-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0078

Abstract

“Semioethics” is a neologism coined in the early 1980s to highlight the relation between signs and values, identity and otherness. It keeps account of Victoria Welby’s concept of “significs” and of Sebeok’s “global semiotics” with its critique of glottocentric and anthropocentric tendencies. Together both sources, significs and global semiotics, provide the context for contributions from semioethics to education. Semioethics recovers the ancient vocation of semiotics, originally “semeiotics,” for life and its wellbeing. It elicits the importance of applying an interdisciplinary approach and a “detotalizing method” in education by contrast to the totalizing approaches of grand narratives. The human being is endowed with a “primary modeling device,” also called “language,” and with it “syntactics.” Semioethics considers the role of these special characteristics that specify the human being as a human being, a “semiotic animal,” and addresses the human propensity for creativity, critique, and responsibility for health over the globe, both in terms of physical-organic materiality, the body, and of semiotic materiality, signs and values. These characteristics can be developed and enhanced through a specifically “linguistic education” with a particular emphasis on otherness, dialogue, and listening. Practicing semioethics becomes more pressing in the face of the relational dynamics between the historical-social and biological spheres, between culture and nature, between semiosphere and biosphere, and between semiotics, biosemiotics, and education.

Keywords: education; interlingualism; global semiotics; modeling; responsibility; semioethics

References

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1963. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo. Moscow: Sovetskij pisatel.Google Scholar

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The dialogic imagination: Four essays, C. Emerson (ed.), M. Holquist (ed. & trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1986. Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1990. Art and answerability: Early philosophical essays by M. M. Bakhtin, M. Holquist & V. Liapunov (eds.), V. Liapunov & K. Bostrom (trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

  • Barthes, Roland. 1964. Éléments de sémiologie. Communications 4. 91–135.Google Scholar

  • Bonfantini, Massimo A. 1987. La semiosi e l’abduzione. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar

  • Capra, Fitjof. 1995. The web of life. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

  • Caputo, Cosimo. 2010a. Il fondo e la forma. La semiosi, la semiotica, l’umano. Lecce: Pensa.Google Scholar

  • Caputo, Cosimo. 2010b. Hjelmslev e la semiotica. Rome: Carocci.Google Scholar

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of a theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1966. Cartesian linguistics. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1976. Reflections on language. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar

  • Cobley, Paul. 2010. Ecosemiotics. In P. Cobley (ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics, 212. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Cobley, Paul, John Deely, Kalevi Kull & Susan Petrilli (eds.). 2011. Semiotics continues to astonish: Thomas A. Sebeok and the doctrine of signs. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Danesi, Marcel. 1998. The body in the sign: Thomas A. Sebeok and semiotics. Ottawa: Legas.Google Scholar

  • Danesi, Marcel, Augusto Ponzio & Susan Petrilli. 2004. Semiotica globale. Bari: Graphis.Google Scholar

  • Danesi, Marcel & Thomas A. Sebeok. 2000. The forms of meanings: Modelling systems theory and semiotics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer.Google Scholar

  • Deely, John, Susan Petrilli & Augusto Ponzio. 2005. The semiotic animal. Ottawa: Legas.Google Scholar

  • Einstein, Albert. 2009 [1949]. Why socialism? Monthly Review 61(1). 55–61.Google Scholar

  • Eliot, Thomas Stearn. 1982. Old Possum’s book of practical cats. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar

  • Hall, Edward T. 1963. A system for the notation of proxemic behaviour. American Anthropologist 65(5). 1003–1026.Google Scholar

  • Hall, Edward T. 1966. The hidden dimension. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar

  • Hardwick, Charles S. (ed.). 1977. Semiotic and significs: The correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hjelmslev, Luis. 1961 [1943]. Prolegomena to a theory of language. Madison: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar

  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper. 1996a. Signs of meaning in the universe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper. 1996b. Für eine semiotisch reformulierte Naturwissenschaft. Zeitschrift für Semiotik 18(1). 31–34.Google Scholar

  • Jakobson, Roman. 1959. On linguistics aspects of translation. In Stephen Rudy (ed.), Selected writings, vol. 2 (of 8 vols. published between 1962–1987), 260–266. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Kull, Kalevi. 1998a. On semiosis, Umwelt, and semiosphere. Semiotica 120(3/4). 69–80.Google Scholar

  • Kull, Kalevi. 1998b. Semiotic ecology: Different natures in the semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies 26. 344–371.Google Scholar

  • Leopardi, Giovanni. 2013. Zibaldone, Michael Caesar & Franco D’Intino (eds.), Kathleen Baldwin et al. (trans.). London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar

  • Levinas, Emmanuel. 1961. Totalité et Infini. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar

  • Levinas, Emmanuel. 1974. Autrement qu’être ou au-dela de l’essence. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar

  • Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1958. Anthropologie structurale. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar

  • Lotman, Jurij. 1990. Universe of the mind: A semiotic theory of culture, Ann Shukman (trans.). London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar

  • Merrell, Floyd & João Queiroz (eds.) 2005. On abduction: Between subjectivity and objectivity. Semiotica 153(1/4). Special issue.Google Scholar

  • Morris, Charles. 1948. The open self. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

  • Morris, Charles. 1964. Signification and significance. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Morris, Charles. 1971. Writings on the general theory of signs. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Nöth, Winfried. 1990. Handbook of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

  • Nöth, Winfried. 1991. Ökosemiotik. Zeitschrift für Semiotik 18(1). 7–18.Google Scholar

  • Nuessel, Frank, Vincent Colapietro & Susan Petrilli (eds.). (2013). On and beyond significs: Centennial issue for Victoria Lady Welby (1837–1912). Semiotica 196(1/4). Special Issue.Google Scholar

  • Ogden, Charles K. 1994. C. K. Ogden and linguistics, 5 vols., T. W. Gordon (ed.). London: Routledge-Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar

  • Ogden, Charles K. & Ivor A. Richards. 1923. The meaning of meaning: A study of the influence of language upon thought and of the science of symbolism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

  • Orr, David W. 1992. Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

  • Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.]Google Scholar

  • Petrilli, Susan. 2005. The semiotic universe of abduction. Special issue, Semiotica 153(1/4). 23–51.Google Scholar

  • Petrilli, Susan. 2009. Signifying and understanding: Reading the works of Victoria Welby and the Signific movement. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Petrilli, Susan. 2010. Sign crossroads in global perspective: Semioethics and responsibility. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar

  • Petrilli, Susan. 2012a. Expression and interpretation in language. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar

  • Petrilli, Susan. 2012b. Alrove e altrimenti. Filosofia del linguaggio, critica letteraria e teoria della traduzione in, con e a partire da Bachtin. Milan: Mimesis.Google Scholar

  • Petrilli, Susan. 2013. The self as a sign, the world, and the other: Living semiotics. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar

  • Petrilli, Susan. 2014a. Sign studies and semioethics: Communication, translation, values. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Petrilli, Susan. 2014b. Man, word, and the other. In Torkild Thellefsen & Bent Sorensen (eds.), Charles Sanders Peirce in his own words: 100 years of semiotics, 5–12. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Petrilli, Susan. 2015a. Victoria Welby and the science of signs: Significs, semiotics, philosophy of language. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar

  • Petrilli, Susan. 2015b. Ethics and significance: Insights from Welby for meaningful education. In Michael Peters (ed.), Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory, 1–5. Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media.Google Scholar

  • Petrilli, Susan. 2016. The global world and its manifold faces: Otherness as the basis of communication. Zurich: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Petrilli, Susan (ed.). 2014. Semioetica e comunicazione globale. Milan: Mimesis.Google Scholar

  • Petrilli, Susan (ed.). 2015. Scienze dei linguaggi e linguaggi delle scienze. Intertestualità, interferenze, mutazioni. Athanor 25(18). Milan: Mimesis.Google Scholar

  • Petrilli, Susan & Augusto Ponzio. 2001. Thomas Sebeok and the signs of life. Cambridge: Icon.Google Scholar

  • Petrilli, Susan & Augusto Ponzio. 2002. I segni e la vita. Milan: Spirali.Google Scholar

  • Petrilli, Susan & Augusto Ponzio. 2003. Semioetica. Rome: Meltemi.Google Scholar

  • Petrilli, Susan & Augusto Ponzio. 2005. Semiotics unbounded: Interpretive routes in the open network of signs. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar

  • Petrilli, Susan & Augusto Ponzio. 2007a. Criticism and education. In Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems, UNESCO. http://www.eolss.net/ (accessed 25 July 2016).

  • Petrilli, Susan & Augusto Ponzio. 2007b. Semiotics today. Ottawa: Legas.Google Scholar

  • Petrilli, Susan & Augusto Ponzio. 2010. Semioethics. In P. Cobley (ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics, 150–162. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Petrilli, Susan & Augusto Ponzio. 2016. Lineamenti di semiotica e di filosofia del linguaggio. Perugia: Guerra.Google Scholar

  • Ponzio, Augusto. 1983. Il bambino e la televisione: dal plurilinguismo alla pluridiscorsività, In Patrizia Mazzotta (ed.), Televisione e scuola, 5–15. Bari: Adriatica.Google Scholar

  • Ponzio, Augusto. 1988. Per un’analisi contestuale-dinamica della letterarietà del testo letterario: I promessi sposi by Alessandro Manzoni. In Tatiana Slama-cazacu (ed.), Analisi del testo letterario, 271–283. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar

  • Ponzio, Augusto. 1995. Sviluppo linguistico e processi formative. Interview with Augusto Ponzio by Franca Pinto Minerva. Scuola 7. 4–5.Google Scholar

  • Ponzio, Augusto. 1997a. Metodologia della formazione linguistica. Rome & Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar

  • Ponzio, Augusto. 1997b. Comunicare l’università. Laboratorio educativo meridionale per l’Europa 1997. 5–13.Google Scholar

  • Ponzio, Augusto. 2002a. Sebeok’s semiotics and education. Semiotica 138(1/4). 299–311.Google Scholar

  • Ponzio, Augusto. 2002b. La differenza non indifferente. Comunicazione, migrazione, Guerra. Milan: Mimesis.Google Scholar

  • Ponzio, Augusto. 2006a. The dialogic nature of sign. Ottawa: Legas.Google Scholar

  • Ponzio, Augusto. 2006b. The I questioned. Subject Matters 3(1). 1–42.Google Scholar

  • Ponzio, Augusto. 2007. Metodica dell’ipertesto e traduzione letteraria. Studi di Glottodidattica 3. 37–56.Google Scholar

  • Ponzio, Augusto. 2008. A mente. Processi cognitivi e formazione linguistica. Perugia: Guerra.Google Scholar

  • Ponzio, Augusto (ed.). 2009. La trappola mortale dell’identità/The mortal trap of identity. Athanor 20(13). Special issue.Google Scholar

  • Ponzio, Augusto. 2012. Línguistica chomskyana e ideologia social. Univesidad Federal do Paraná, Curitibam Editora.

  • Ponzio, Augusto. 2013. Fuori luogo. L’esorbitante nella produzione dell’identico. Milan: Mimesis.Google Scholar

  • Ponzio, Augusto (ed.). 2014. Bachtin e il suo circolo. In Opere 1919–1930. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar

  • Ponzio, Augusto. 2015. Tra semiotica e letteratura. Introduzione a Michail Bachtin. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar

  • Ponzio, Augusto & Giuseppe Mininni. 1980. Scuola e plurilinguismo. Bari: Dedalo.Google Scholar

  • Ponzio, Augusto, Patrizia Calefato & Susan Petrilli. 1999. Fondamenti di filosofia del linguaggio, 2nd edn. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar

  • Posner, Roland, Klaus Robering & Thomas A. Sebeok (eds.). 1997–2004. Semiotik/semiotics: A handbook on the sign-theoretic foundations of nature and culture, 4 vols. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Rossi-Landi, Ferruccio. 1968. Il linguaggio come lavoro e come mercato. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar

  • Rossi-Landi, Ferruccio. 1972. Semiotica e ideologia. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar

  • Rossi-Landi, Ferruccio. 1975. Linguistics and economics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Rossi-Landi, Ferruccio. 1978. Ideologia. Milan: ISEDI.Google Scholar

  • Rossi-Landi, Ferruccio. 1985. Metodica filosofica e scienza dei segni. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar

  • Rossi-Landi, Ferruccio. 1992. Between signs and non-signs, S. Petrilli (ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar

  • Schmitz, Walter H. (ed.). 1990. Essays on significs: Papers presented on the occasion of the 150th anniversary of the birth of Victoria Lady Welby. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. 1976. Contributions to the doctrine of signs. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. 1979. The sign and its masters. Texas: The University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. 1986. I think I am a verb. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. 1994. Signs. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. 1998. A sign is just a sign. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. 2001. Global semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

  • Sebeok, Thomas A., Sydney M. Lamb & John O. Regan. 1988. Semiotics and education. Claremont, CA: Claremont Graduate School.Google Scholar

  • Semetsky, Inna (ed.). 2010. Semiotics education experience. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar

  • Stables, Andrew & Inna Semetsky. 2015. Edusemiotics: Semiotic philosophy as educational philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Uexküll, Jakob von. 1992 [1934]. A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: A picture book of invisible worlds. Semiotica 89(4), 319–991.Google Scholar

  • Vailati, Giovanni. 1971. Epistolario 1889–1909, G. Lanaro (ed.). Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar

  • Vailati, Giovanni. 1987. Scritti, 3 vols., M. Quaranta (ed.). Sala Bolognese: Arnaldo Forni.Google Scholar

  • Vernadsky, Viktor I. 1926. Biosfera. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar

  • Welby, Victoria. 1983 [1903]. What is meaning? Studies in the development of Significance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Welby, Victoria. 1985 [1911]. Significs and language: The articulate form of our expressive and interpretative resources. In H. Walter Schmitz (ed.), Significs and language, 1–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2016-08-13

Published in Print: 2016-11-01


Citation Information: Semiotica, Volume 2016, Issue 213, Pages 247–279, ISSN (Online) 1613-3692, ISSN (Print) 0037-1998, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0078.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in