Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Semiotica

Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies / Revue de l'Association Internationale de Sémiotique

Editor-in-Chief: Danesi, Marcel


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.509

CiteScore 2018: 0.23

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.232
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.478

Agenzia Nazionale di Valutazione del Sistema Universitario e della Ricerca: Classe A

Online
ISSN
1613-3692
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 2018, Issue 222

Issues

Groupuscular identity-creation in online-communication of the Estonian extreme right

Mari-Liis Madisson / Andreas Ventsel
Published Online: 2018-04-25 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0077

Abstract

For explaining the dispersed extreme right movements that are presently flourishing in the online sphere, British historian and political theorist Roger Griffin has elaborated the concept of groupuscular right. The groupuscular right can be characterized by the non-hierarchic and the rhizomatic structure of intra-groupuscular communication. Our study on Estonian groupuscular right complements it with the ideas of cultural semiotics that help to explicate self-descriptions of particular groupuscular nodes (e.g., blog posts) but also to analyze their relations with other extreme right groupuscules and with the radical online sphere as a whole. Although the extreme right’s communication has become more heterogeneous in its form and content, it is still possible to distinguish central and peripheral meanings. Our approach allows us to understand a seemingly paradoxical problem: why, despite of the plurality of different view-points available on the web, are groupuscular communications still dominated by strict and homogeneous ways of modeling information.

Keywords: theory of communication/culture; extreme right; online communication cultural semiotics; code text

References

  • Angouri, Jo & Ruth Wodak. 2014. “They became big in the shadow of the crisis”: The Greek success story and the rise of the far right. Discourse & Society 25(4). 540–565.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Annual review of the Estonian Security Police. 2012. http://www.kapo.ee/cms-data/_text/38/44/files/kapo-aastaraamat-2012-est.pdf.

  • Atton, Cris. 2006. Far-right media on the Internet: Culture, discourse and power. New media & society 8(4). 573–587.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Auers, Daunis & Andres Kasekamp. 2009. Explaining the electoral failure of extreme-right parties in Estonia and Latvia. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 17(2). 241–254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Auers, Daunis & Andres Kasekamp. 2013. Comparing radical-right populism in Estonia and Latvia. In B. Mral, M. Khosravinik & R. Wodak (eds.), Populism in Europe: Politics and discourse, 235–248. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

  • Auers, Daunis & Andres Kasekamp. 2015. The impact of radical right parties in the Baltic states. In M. Minkenberg (ed.), Transforming the transformation? The East European radical right in the political process, 137–153. Abingdon, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Back, Les. 2002. Aryans reading Adorno: Cyber-culture and twenty-first century racism. Ethnic and Racial Studies 25(4). 628–651.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ballinger, Dean. 2011. Conspiratoria: The Internet and the logic of conspiracy theory. Waikato: University of Waikato dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Barkun, Michael. 2003. A culture of conspiracy: Apocalyptic visions in contemporary America. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

  • Bratich, Jack Z. 2008. Conspiracy panics: Political rationality and popular culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

  • Caiani, Manuela, Donatella della Porta & Claudius Wagemann. 2012. Mobilizing on the extreme right: Germany, Italy, and the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Caiani, Manuela & Patricia Kröll. 2014. The transnationalization of the extreme right and the use of the Internet. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 39(4). 331–351.Google Scholar

  • Campbell, Alex. 2006. The search for authenticity: An exploration of an online skinhead newsgroup. New media & Society 8(2). 269–294.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Castells, Manuel. 2009. Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Daniels, Jessie. 2008. Cyber racism: White supremacy online and the new attack on civil rights (perspectives on a multiracial America). Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

  • Daniels, Jessie. 2012. Race and racism in Internet studies: A review and critique. New Media Society 10. 1–25.Google Scholar

  • Eco, Umberto. 2003. Vegetal and mineral memory: The future of books. https://www.bibalex.org/attachments/english/Vegetal_and_Mineral_Memory.pdf (accessed 20 February 2018).

  • Fekete, Liz. 2012. Pedlars of hate: The violent impact of the European far right. London: Institute of Race Relations.Google Scholar

  • Fenster, Mark. 2008. Conspiracy theories: Secrecy and power in American culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

  • Griffin, Roger. 1999. Net gains and GUD reactions: Patterns of prejudice in a Neo-fascist groupuscule. Patterns of Prejudice 33(2). 31–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Griffin, Roger. 2002a. The incredible shrinking ism: The survival of fascism in the post-fascist era. Patterns of Prejudice 36(3). 3–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Griffin, Roger. 2002b. The primacy of culture: The current growth (or manufacture) of consensus within fascist studies. Journal of Contemporary History 37. 21–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Griffin, Roger. 2003. From slime mold to rhizome: An introduction to the groupuscular right. Patterns of Prejudice 37(1). 27–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hainsworth, Paul. 2008. Extreme right western Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Kaplan, Jeffrey, Leonhard Weinberg & Ted Oleson. 2003. Dreams and realities in cyberspace: White Aryan resistance and the World Church of the Creator. Patterns of Prejudice 2(37). 139–155.Google Scholar

  • Kasekamp, Andres. 2003. Extreme-right parties in contemporary Estonia. Patterns of Prejudice 37(4). 401–414.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kress, Günther. 2005. Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Landow, George P. 2006. Hypertext 3.0: Critical theory and new media in an era of globalization. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lotman, Juri. 1988. Text within a text. Soviet Psychology 26(3). 32–51.Google Scholar

  • Lotman, Juri. 1997. Culture as a subject and an object in itself. Trames 1(51/46). 7–16.Google Scholar

  • Lotman, Juri. 2005. On semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies 33(1). 205–229.Google Scholar

  • Lotman, Juri. 2010. “Kultuuri õpetamise” problem kui tüpoloogiline karakteristik. In S. Salupere (ed.), Kultuuritüpoloogiast, 60–72. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.Google Scholar

  • Lotman, Juri & Boris Uspenski. 1984. The role of dual models in dynamics of Russian culture (up to the end of the eighteenth century). In A. Shukman (ed.), The semiotics of Russian culture, 3–35. Michigan: Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

  • Madisson, Mari-Liis. 2014. The semiotic logic of signification of conspiracy theories. Semiotica 202(1/4). 273–300.Google Scholar

  • Madisson, Mari-Liis. 2016. The semiotic construction of identities in hypermedia environments: The analysis of online communication of the Estonian extreme right. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Madisson, Mari-Liis. forthcoming. NWO conspiracy theory: A key frame in online communication of Estonian extreme right. Lexia 23(24). 189–208.Google Scholar

  • Madisson, Mari-Liis & Andreas Ventsel. 2016. “Freedom of speech” in the self-descriptions of the Estonian extreme right groupuscules. National Identities 18(2). 89–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mudde, Cas. 1995. Right-wing extremism analyzed: A comparative analysis of the ideologies of three alleged right-wing extremist parties (NPD, NDP, CP’86). European Journal of Political Research 27(2). 203–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mudde, Cas. 2000. The ideology of the extreme right. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

  • Mudde, Cas. 2005. Racist extremism in central and eastern Europe. East European Politics and Societies 19(2). 161–184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mudde, Cas. 2007. Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Mudde, Cas. 2011. Who’s afraid of the European radical right? Dissent 58(4). 7–11.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nakamura, Lisa & Peter A. Chow-White. 2012. Introduction. Race and digital technology: Code, the color line, and the information society. In L. Nakamura & P. A. Chow-White (eds.), Race after the Internet, 1–18. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Orwell, George 1949. 1984. London: Secker & WarburgGoogle Scholar

  • Poleshchuk, Vadim. 2005. Estonia. In C. Mudde (ed.), Racist extremism in central and eastern Europe, 54–73. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Ryan, Marie-Laure. 2006. Avatars of story. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

  • Shifman, Limor. 2011. An anatomy of YouTube meme. New Media & Society 14(2). 187–203.Google Scholar

  • Siibak, Andra. 2014. Being publicly private: Extreme nationalist user practices on social networks. In N. Giacomello (ed.), Security in cyberspace: Targeting nations, infrastructures, individuals, 215–230. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

  • Sommer, Brend. 2008. Anti-capitalism in the name of ethno-nationalism: Ideological shifts on the German extreme right. Patterns of Prejudice 42(3). 305–316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spark, Alasdair. 2003. New world order. In P. Knight (ed.), Conspiracy theories in American history: An encyclopedia, 536–539. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar

  • Sunstein, Cass R. 2009. Going to extremes: How like minds unite and divide. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Torop, Peeter. 2003. Semiospherical understanding: Textuality. Sign Systems Studies 31(2). 323–337.Google Scholar

  • Ventsel, Andreas. 2010. The construction of the Stalinist post-war (1944–1953) “Soviet People”: A concept in the political rhetoric of Soviet Estonia. Applied Semiotics/Sémiotique appliquée 10(25). 73–83.Google Scholar

  • Virchow, Fabian. 2004. The groupuscularization of neo-Nazism in Germany: The case of the Aktionsbüro Norddeutschland. Patterns of Prejudice 38(1). 56–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wojcieszak, Magdalena. 2010. “Don’t talk to me”: Effects of ideologically homogeneous online groups and politically dissimilar offline ties on extremism. New media & Society 12(4). 637–655.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-04-25

Published in Print: 2018-04-25


This work was supported by Semiotic modelling of self-description mechanisms: Theory and applications [IUT 2– 44]; Marie Curie International Research Staff Exchange Scheme Fellowship within the 7th European Community Framework Programme [EU-PREACC project]; Conceptualisations and experiences with public and private in technologically saturated society [PUT 44].


Citation Information: Semiotica, Volume 2018, Issue 222, Pages 25–46, ISSN (Online) 1613-3692, ISSN (Print) 0037-1998, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0077.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Andres Kasekamp, Mari-Liis Madisson, and Louis Wierenga
Problems of Post-Communism, 2018, Page 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in