Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …


Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies / Revue de l'Association Internationale de Sémiotique

Editor-in-Chief: Danesi, Marcel

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.509

CiteScore 2018: 0.23

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.232
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.478

Agenzia Nazionale di Valutazione del Sistema Universitario e della Ricerca: Classe A

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 2018, Issue 222


Interpretant, pure rhetoric, and semiotics of poetry

Masoud Algooneh Juneghani
Published Online: 2018-04-25 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0083


One of the main components of the Peirce’s semiotics is interpretant, which is formed through the interaction of representamen and object in the mind of the subject. As meaning-production is an endless, infinite process, it is the interpretant that plays a key function in this process; in fact interpretant leads to the revival of some other sign and consequently makes the signification go on in an endless route. Peirce, taking this in mind, asserts that the study of the rules by which an interpretant leads to the revival of another new sign could be established under a comprehensive topic of pure rhetoric. However, the question of pure rhetoric and its rules is almost completely neglected in his writings and his arguments in this regard are no more than a couple of pages. As a result, the present research tries not only to analyze and justify the rules proposed by Peirce, but also investigate theoretically their application in the semiotics of poetry. The researcher, accordingly, by proposing a new model, tries to open up an infinitesimal aperture to the world of semiotics. This goal is somewhat achieved.

Keywords: interpretant; pure rhetoric; semiotics of poetry; significance; Peirce


  • Ahmadi, Babak. 2004. The text-structure and textual interpretation. Tehran: Markaz.Google Scholar

  • Bradley, Arthur. 2008. Derrida’s Of grammatology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

  • Chandler, Daniel. 2007. Semiotics: The basics. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Colapietro, V. 2007. C. S. Peirce’s rhetorical turn. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43(1). 16–52.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Eco, Umberto. 1976. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

  • Frazer, James George. 2009. The golden bough: A study of magic and religion. Auckland: Floating Press.Google Scholar

  • Freud, Sigmund. 2010 [1955]. The interpretation of dreams, 3rd edn., James Strachey (trans.). New York: Basic.Google Scholar

  • Johansen, Jorgen Dines & Svend Erik Larsen. 2005. Signs in use: An introduction to semiotics, D. Gorlee & J. Irons (trans.). London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Lotman, Yuri. 1977. The structure of the artistic text, Gail Lenhoff & Ronald Vroon (trans.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

  • Makaryk, Irena Rima. 2005. Encyclopedia of contemporary literary theory, M. Mohajer & M. Nabavi (trans.). Tehran: Agaah.Google Scholar

  • Merrell, Floyd. 1997. Charles Sanders Peirce’s concept of the sign. In P. Cobley (ed.), Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics, 28–39. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Nöth, Winfried. 1991. Handbook of semiotics. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ortony, Andrew. 1993. Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols, C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.].Google Scholar

  • Peirce, Charles S. 2011 [1955]. Philosophical writings of Peirce, Justus Buchler (ed.). New York: Dover.Google Scholar

  • Riffaterre, Michael. 1978. Semiotics of poetry. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

  • Sacks, Sheldon. 1979. On metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Shafii Kadkani, Mohammadreza. 2006. Poetic musicality. Tehran: Agah.Google Scholar

  • Simondon, G. 1992 [1964]. The genesis of the individual. In J. Crary & S. Kwinter (eds.), Incorporations, 297–319. New York: Zone.Google Scholar

  • Warren, Paul. 2013. Introducing psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-04-25

Published in Print: 2018-04-25

Citation Information: Semiotica, Volume 2018, Issue 222, Pages 163–179, ISSN (Online) 1613-3692, ISSN (Print) 0037-1998, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0083.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in