Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Semiotica

Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies / Revue de l'Association Internationale de Sémiotique

Editor-in-Chief: Danesi, Marcel


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.509

CiteScore 2018: 0.23

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.232
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.478

Agenzia Nazionale di Valutazione del Sistema Universitario e della Ricerca: Classe A

Online
ISSN
1613-3692
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 2018, Issue 222

Issues

Shaken and stirred: Social representations, social media, and community empowerment in emergency contexts

Mauro Sarrica / Manuela Farinosi / Francesca Comunello / Sonia Brondi / Lorenza Parisi / Leopoldina Fortunati
Published Online: 2018-04-25 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0208

Abstract

In this paper we examine the use of Twitter and Facebook in two dramatic earthquakes that hit Italy: L’Aquila (in 2009) and Emilia (in 2012). Indeed, disasters disrupt everyday life and engage people in meaning-making processes aimed at recovering meaning and control of their world. In these cases, we argue that the use of social media may contribute to social representations processes and functions: cognitive coping, social sharing of emotions, preserving self-efficacy, boosting identity, and community empowerment. Different methods were adopted to examine the use of social media in the immediate aftermath, a few days after, and in the medium-long term. Differences between the events, combined with the differences between Twitter and Facebook, entailed a multiplicity of uses. Nevertheless, the analyses point to the same conclusions: by fostering new forms of communication and encounters, social media played an increasingly important role during and after the earthquakes. First, they were used for providing information and material coping, then they favored the social sharing of emotions and joint remembering, and finally they contributed to claiming voice and control. Results thus suggest that the use of social media favored different representational functions, which progressively contributed to community empowerment.

Keywords: functions of social representations; social media; earthquakes; disaster; empowerment

References

  • Adey, Peter, Ben Anderson & Stephen Graham. 2015. Introduction: Governing emergencies: Beyond exceptionality. Theory, Culture & Society 32(2). 3–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Axia, Giovanna. 2006. Emergenza e psicologia [Emergency and psychology]. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar

  • Bandura, Albert. 2004. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education & Behavior 31(2). 143–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bauer, Martin K. & George Gaskell. 2008. Social representations theory: A progressive research programme for social psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 38(4). 335–353.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bortree, Denise S. & Trent Seltzer. 2009. Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups’ Facebook profiles. Public Relations Review 35(3). 317–319.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Breakwell, Glynis M. 2001. Mental models and social representations of hazards: The significance of identity processes. Journal of Risk Research 4(4). 341–351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Comunello, Francesca (ed.). 2014. Social media e comunicazione d’emergenza [Social media and emergency communication]. Milan: Guerini.Google Scholar

  • Comunello, Francesca & Lorenza Parisi. 2014. Social media e disastri naturali: Un’analisi dei tweet durante il terremoto in Emilia [Social media and natural disaster: Analysis of tweets during the Emilia earthquake]. In Francesca Comunello (ed.), Social media e comunicazione d’emergenza [Social media and emergency communication], 33–46. Milan: Guerini.Google Scholar

  • Elcheroth, Guy, Willem Doise & Stephen Reicher. 2011. On the knowledge of politics and the politics of knowledge: How a social representations approach helps us rethink the subject of political psychology. Political Psychology 32. 729–758.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Emiliani, Francesca. 2008. La realtà delle piccole cose: Psicologia del quotidiano [The reality of small things: Everyday psychology]. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar

  • Farinosi, Manuela & Emiliano Treré. 2010. Inside the “People of the Wheelbarrows”: Participation between online and offline dimension in the post-quake social movement. The Journal of Community Informatics 6(3). Retrieved from http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/761/639

  • Farinosi, Manuela & Emiliano Treré. 2014. Challenging mainstream media, documenting real life and sharing with the community: An analysis of the motivations for producing citizen journalism in a post-disaster city. Global Media and Communication 10(1). 73–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Farinosi, Manuela & Leopoldina Fortunati. 2013. A new fashion: Dressing up the cities. Textile 11(3). 282–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Farinosi, Manuela & Alessandra Micalizzi (eds.). 2013. NetQuake: Media digitali e disastri naturali. Dieci ricerche empiriche sul ruolo della Rete nel terremoto dell’Aquila [Digital media and natural disaster: Ten empirical research on the role of the Net in the earthquake of L’Aquila]. Milan: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar

  • Farinosi, Manuela & Alessandra Micalizzi. 2015. Geolocating the past: Online memories after an earthquake. in Andrea Hajek, Christine Lohmeier & Christian Pentzold (eds.), Memory in a mediated world: Remembrance and reconstruction, 90–110. Basingstoke: Palmgrave.Google Scholar

  • Festinger, Leon. 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Flick, Uwe. 2009. An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Fortunati, Leopoldina. 2014. Media between power and empowerment: Can we resolve this dilemma? The Information society 30(3). 169–183.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fraustino, Julia D., Brooke F. Liu & Yan Jin. 2013. Social media use during disasters: A review of the knowledge base and gaps. Final Report to Human Factors/Behavioral Sciences Division, Science and Technology Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. College Park, MD: START.Google Scholar

  • Fritz, Charles E. 1968. Disasters. in David Sills (ed.), International encyclopedia of social sciences, 202–207. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

  • Gaffney, David & Cornelius Puschmann. 2014. Data collection on Twitter. in Katrin Weller, Axel Bruns, Jean E. Burgess, Merja Mahrt & Cornelius Puschmann (eds.), Twitter and society, 55–67. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Gao, Huiji, Geoffrey Barbier & Rebecca Goolsby. 2011. Harnessing the crowdsourcing power of social media for disaster relief. IEEE Intelligent Systems 26(3). 10–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gilbert, Claude. 1998. Reply to Hewitt. in Enrico L. Quarantelli (ed.), What is a disaster? Perspectives on the question, 91–95. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

  • Goodchild, Michael F. 2007. Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69(4). 211–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gruev-Vintila, Andreea & Michel-Louis Rouquette. 2007. Social thinking about collective risk: How do risk-related practice and personal involvement impact its social representations? Journal of Risk Research 10. 555–581.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Herring, Susan C. 2010. Web content analysis: Expanding the parading. in Jeremy Hunsinger, Lisbeth Klastrup & Matthew Allen (eds.), The international handbook of internet research, 233–250. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Howarth, Caroline. 2006. A social representation is not a quiet thing: Exploring the critical potential of social representations theory. British Journal of Social Psychology 45(1). 65–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hughes, Amanda L., Lise A. A. St. Denis, Leysia Palen & Kenneth M. Anderson. 2014. Online public communications by police & fire services during the 2012 Hurricane Sandy. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, 1505–1514. New York: ACM.Google Scholar

  • Joffé, Helene. 2003. Risk: From perception to social representation. British Journal of Social Psychology 42. 55–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Joffé, Helene, Tiziana Rossetto, Christian Solberg & Cliodhna O’Connor. 2013. Social representations of earthquakes: A study of people living in three highly seismic areas. Earthquake Spectra 29(2). 367–397.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jovchelovitch, Sandra. 2005. Social representations in and of the public sphere: Towards a theoretical articulation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 25(1). 81–102.Google Scholar

  • Kodrich, Kris & Melinda N. Laituri. 2011. Making a connection: Social media’s key role in the Haiti earthquake. Journal of Communication and Computer 8. 624–627.Google Scholar

  • Kotsiopoulos, Ioannis. 2014. Social media in crisis management: Role, potential, and risk. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE/ACM 7th international conference on utility and cloud computing, 681–686. London: IEEE.Google Scholar

  • Leetaru Kalev, H., Shaowen Wang, Guofeng Cao, Anand Padmanabhan & Eric Shook. 2013. Mapping the global Twitter heartbeat: The geography of Twitter. First Monday 18. 5–6.Google Scholar

  • Lewicka, Maria. 2011. Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology 31(3). 207–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lindell, Michael K. & Ronald W. Perry. 2000. Household adjustment to earthquake hazard a review of research. Environment and Behavior 32(4). 461–501.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moscovici, Serge. 1973. Foreword. in Claudine Herzlich (ed.), Health and illness: A social psychological analysis, IX–XIV. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Moscovici, Serge. 1988. Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology 18. 211–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moscovici, Serge & Ivana Marková. 1998. Presenting social representations: A conversation. Psychology and Culture 4. 371–410.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mulargia, Simone. 2014. Twittare in condizioni di emergenza. Dall’attivazione spontanea degli utenti alle strategie istituzionali [Tweet in emergency. From spontaneous activation of users to institutional strategies]. In Francesca Comunello (ed.), Social media e comunicazione d’emergenza [Social media and emergency communication], 33–46. Milan: Guerini.Google Scholar

  • Pareto, Vilfredo. 1988 [1916]. Trattato di Sociologia Generale [Treatise of General Sociology], vol. 4. Turin: UTET.Google Scholar

  • Pennebaker, James W. & Kent D. Harber. 1993. A social stage model of collective coping: The Loma-Prieta earthquake and the Persian-Gulf war. Journal of Social Issues 49. 125–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pietrantoni, Luca, Gabriele Prati & Luigi Palestini. 2008. Il primo soccorso nelle maxi-emergenze e nei disastri [First aid in massive emergency and disasters]. Bologna: Clueb.Google Scholar

  • Prati, Gianluca, Valeria Catufi & Luca Pietrantoni. 2012. Emotional and behavioral reactions to tremors of the Umbria-Marche earthquake. Disasters 36(3). 439–451.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Procopio, Claire H. & Steven T. Procopio. 2007. Do you know what it means to miss New Orleans? Internet communication, geographic community, and social capital in crisis. Journal of Applied Communication Research 35. 67–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rimé, Bernard, Catrin Finkenauer, Olivier Luminet, Emmanuelle Zech & Pierre Philippot. 1998. Social sharing of emotion: New evidence and new questions. European Review of Social Psychology 9(1). 145–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Saakvitne, Karen W. & Laurie A. Pearlman, the Staff of the Traumatic Stress Institute. 1996. Transforming the pain: A workbook on vicarious traumatization. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

  • Sarrica, Mauro, Mara Germani & Sonia Brondi. 2014. Istanti, ore, giorni dopo il terremoto: Spunti dall’analisi dei tweet per la Psicologia dell’Emergenza [Moments, hours, days after the earthquake: Cues for Emergency Psychology from tweets analysis]. in Francesca Comunello (ed.), Social media e comunicazione d’emergenza [Social media and emergency communication], 87–106. Milan: Guerini.Google Scholar

  • Sarrica, Mauro, Alice Roseti, Sonia Brondi, Pierluigi Cervelli & Giovanna Leone. 2016. Flooded by a wall of water: Parent-child reminiscing about local environment and unwanted changes. Qualitative Research in Psychology 13(3). 209–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schade, Sven, Gianluca Luraschi, Bertrand De Longueville, Simon Cox & Laura Díaz. 2010. Citizens as sensors for crisis events: Sensor web enablement for volunteered geographic information. Paper presented at WebMGS 2010. August 26–27, Como, Italy.Google Scholar

  • Schradie, Jen. 2011. The digital production gap: The digital divide and Web 2.0 collide. Poetics 39(2). 145–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Semaan, Bryan & Gloria Mark. 2012. “Facebooking” towards crisis recovery and beyond: Disruption as an opportunity. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 27–36. New York: ACM.Google Scholar

  • Shirky, Clay. 2003. Power-laws, weblog and inequality. in Jon Lebkowski & Mitch Ratcliffe (eds.), Extreme Democracy, 46–52. E-Book available at http://www.extremedemocracy.com/.

  • Shirky, Clay. 2008. Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

  • Spiro, Emma S., Jeannette Sutton, Matt Greczek, Sean Fitzhugh, Nicole Pierski & Carter T. Butts. 2012. Rumoring during extreme events: A case study of Deepwater Horizon 2010. Paper presented at the International Conference on WebSci 2012. Evanston, IL, June.Google Scholar

  • Starbird, Kate & Leysia Palen. 2011. “Voluntweeters”: Self-organizing by digital volunteers in times of crisis. Paper presented at the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Human Interaction, Vancouver, BC, Canada, May.Google Scholar

  • Wagner, Wolfgang & Nicky Hayes. 2005. Everyday discourse and common sense: The theory of social representations. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar

  • White, Joanne, Leysia Palen & Kenneth Anderson. 2014. Digital mobilization in disaster response: The work & self-organization of on-line pet advocates in response to Hurricane Sandy. In Proceedings of the ACM 2014 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Baltimore.Google Scholar

  • Young, Bruce H., Julian D. Ford, Josef I. Ruzek, Matthew J. Friedman & Fred D. Gusman. 1998. Disaster mental health services: A guidebook for clinicians and administrators. Menlo Park, CA: National Center for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-04-25

Published in Print: 2018-04-25


Citation Information: Semiotica, Volume 2018, Issue 222, Pages 321–346, ISSN (Online) 1613-3692, ISSN (Print) 0037-1998, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0208.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Julius T. Nganji and Lynn Cockburn
Behaviour & Information Technology, 2019, Page 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in