Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Semiotica

Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies / Revue de l'Association Internationale de Sémiotique

Editor-in-Chief: Danesi, Marcel


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.183
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.283

CiteScore 2017: 0.23

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.228
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.634

Agenzia Nazionale di Valutazione del Sistema Universitario e della Ricerca: Classe A

Online
ISSN
1613-3692
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 2018, Issue 224

Issues

Iconically modeling a demolition process in the photobook Palast Der Republik

Letícia Alves Vitral / João Queiroz
Published Online: 2018-07-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0029

Abstract

Palast der Republik, by the photographer Christoph Rokitta, is an independent photobook published in 2013 in Berlin. In the photobook different semiotic resources are coupled in order to iconically model the demolition of the homonymous building in Berlin. In opposition to the trivial notion of icon as sign that stands for its object in a relation of similarity, we analyze the photobook as an icon whose main feature is the possibility of discovering information about its object through its manipulation. This specific feature is called operational criterion for iconicity, and it stresses the inherent quality of icons of revealing information available through their manipulation and observation. Our aim is to describe and analyze the relations between semiotic resources in this photobook by exploring the operational criterion of iconicity, and models as epistemic artifacts. We are interested in how couplings between semiotic resources in the photobook can iconically model a spatio-temporal process.

Keywords: photobook; iconicity; modeling; epistemic artifacts; Palast der Republik; semiotic resources

References

  • Achinstein, Peter. 1965. Theoretical models. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16(62) 102–120.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Ambrosio, Chiara. 2010. Iconicity as homomorphism: The case of Picasso’s Guernica. In: M. Bergman, S. Paavola, A.-V. Pietarinen and H. Rydenfelteds, Ideas in action: Proceedings of the applying Peirce conference (Nordic Studies in Pragmatism 1), 151–162. Helsinki: Nordic Pragmatism Network.Google Scholar

  • Atkin, Albert. 2005. Peirce on the index and indexical reference. Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society 41(1) 161–188.Google Scholar

  • Bokulich, Alisa. 2011. How scientific models can explain. Synthese 180(1) 33–45.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Chevalier, Jean-Marie. 2015. The problem of resemblance in Peirce’s semiotics and philosophy. Versus 120. 45–59.Google Scholar

  • Downes, Stephen M. 1992. The importance of models in theorizing: A deflationary semantic view. PSA: Proceedings of the biennial meeting of the philosophy of science association 1. 142–153.Google Scholar

  • Frigg, Roman. 2002. Models and representation: Why structures are not enough. In: Measurement in physics and economics discussion paper series, 1–42. London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar

  • Frigg, Roman & Stephan Hartmann. 2012. Models in science. In Edward Zaltaed, The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/models-science. (accessed 25 April 2015).

  • Giere, Ronald N. 1988. Explaining science. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Giere, Ronald N. 2004. How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science 71(5) 742–752.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harré, Rom & Daniel Rothbart. 2004. Modeling: Gateway to the unknown Vol. 1: Gulf. New York: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

  • Hoffmann, Michael H.G. 2005. Signs as means for discoveries. In: M. H. G. Hoffmann, J. Lenhard and F. Seeger (Eds.), Activity and sign: Grounding mathematics education, 45–56. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Hookway, Christopher. 2002. Truth, rationality, and pragmatism: Themes from Peirce. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Johansen, Jorgen D. 1993. Dialogic semiosis. Indiana: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

  • Knuuttila, Tarja. 2005. Models as epistemic artefacts. Helskinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Philosophy.Google Scholar

  • Knuuttila, Tarja & Mieke Boon. 2011. How do models give us knowledge? The case of Carnot’s ideal heat engine. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1(3) 309–334.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Knuuttila, Tarja & Atro Voutilainen. 2003. A parser as an epistemic artefact: A material view on models. Philosophy of Science 70. 1484–1495.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kralemann, Björn & Claas Lattmann. 2013. Models as icons: Modeling models in the semiotic framework of Peirce’s theory of signs. Synthese 190(6) 3397–3420.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, Vol. 8 : C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss and A. W. Burkseds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.].Google Scholar

  • Peirce, Charles S. 1967. Manuscripts in the Houghton Library of Harvard University, as identified by Richard Robin, Annotated catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. [Reference to Peirce’s manuscripts will be designated MS or L.]Google Scholar

  • Peirce, Charles S. 1982. Writings of Charles S. Peirce, Vol. 6 : M. Fisch, E. Moore and C. Kloeseleds. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s writings will be designated W followed by volume and page number.].Google Scholar

  • Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1998. Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2 (1893–1913). Peirce Edition Projecteds. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to vol. 2 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 2.].Google Scholar

  • Pravica, David W. & Michael J. Spurr. 2011. Mathematical modeling for the scientific method. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.Google Scholar

  • Queiroz, João & Charbel Nino El-Hani. 2012. Downward determination in semiotic multi-level systems. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 19. 123–136.Google Scholar

  • Rokkita, Christoph. 2013. Palast der Republik. Berlin.Google Scholar

  • Salthe, Stanley N. 2009. A hierarchical framework for levels of reality: Understanding through representation. Axiomathes 19(1) 87–99.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2000. Diagrams as centerpiece of a Peircean epistemology. Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society 36(3) 357–384.Google Scholar

  • Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2007. Diagrammatology: An investigation on the borderlines of phenomenology, ontology and semiotics. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2011. On operational and optimal iconicity in Peirce’s diagrammatology. Semiotica 186(1/4) 395–419.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Suppe, Frederick. 1989. The semantic conception of theories and scientific realism. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

  • Suppe, Frederik. 1974. Theories and phenomena. In: W. Leinfellner and E. Köhler (eds.), Developments in the methodology of social science, 45–91. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Van Fraassen, Bas C. 1980. The scientific image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Van Fraassen, Bas C. 1989. Laws and symmetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-07-26

Published in Print: 2018-09-25


Citation Information: Semiotica, Volume 2018, Issue 224, Pages 191–209, ISSN (Online) 1613-3692, ISSN (Print) 0037-1998, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0029.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in