Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Semiotica

Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies / Revue de l'Association Internationale de Sémiotique

Editor-in-Chief: Danesi, Marcel


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.509

CiteScore 2018: 0.23

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.232
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.478

Agenzia Nazionale di Valutazione del Sistema Universitario e della Ricerca: Classe A

Online
ISSN
1613-3692
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 2019, Issue 227

Issues

Expounding knowledge through explanations: Generic types and rhetorical-relational patterns

Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen / Jack Pun
Published Online: 2019-02-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0045

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on contexts where the primary activity is to expound knowledge about general classes of phenomena, either by categorizing and characterizing them or by explaining them based on some theory, ranging from a commonsense folk theory to an uncommonsense scientific theory. Texts produced in such contexts include science lectures, research articles, and entries in encyclopedias. We focus on explanations, considering them across strata in terms of context, semantics, and lexicogrammar, and summarizing contributions from different research strands. Against this background, we report on a study of the registers used in secondary school chemistry textbooks in Hong Kong. We begin by summarizing a framework for classifying the contexts in which texts operate – a framework designed to allow us to differentiate different kinds of text according to the contexts they operate in. Then, we focus on one type of context – that of expounding knowledge about general classes of phenomena. Next, we identify different strategies of expounding knowledge, contrasting explanations and categorizations, and then discuss explanations in more detail. Finally, we move to the question of how these contextual types are realized semantically as texts organized as rhetorical complexes, drawing on secondary school textbooks in chemistry in particular.

Keywords: systemic functional linguistics; discourse analysis; explanation; science education; educational genre; rhetorical relationship

References

  • Bateman, John A. 2008. Multimodality and genre: A foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. London & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Bernstein, Basil. 2000. Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

  • Cheng, E., J. Chow, Y. F. Chow, A. Kai, K. K. Lai & W. H. Wong. 2010. HKDSE chemistry: A modern view, vols. 1–3 & workbooks. Hong Kong: Aristo Educational Press.Google Scholar

  • Christie, Fran & Beverley Derewianka. 2008. School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

  • Coffin, Caroline. 2006. Historical discourse. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

  • Derewianka, Beverly. 1995. Language development in the transition from childhood to adolescence: The role of grammatical metaphor. Sydney: Macquarie University dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Fries, Peter H. 1981. On the status of theme in English: Arguments from discourse. Forum Linguisticum 6(1). 1–38.Google Scholar

  • Ghadessy, Mohsen (ed.) 1993. Register analysis: Theory and practice. London & New York: Pinter.Google Scholar

  • Ghadessy, Mohsen (ed.). 1999. Text and context in functional linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Gregory, Michael J. 1967. Aspects of varieties differentiation. Journal of Linguistics 3. 177–198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gregory, Michael J. & Susanne Carroll. 1978. Language and situation: Language varieties and their social contexts. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

  • Gu, Yueguo. 2002. Towards an understanding of workplace discourse – a pilot study for compiling a spoken Chinese corpus of situated discourse. In Christopher Candlin (ed.), Theory and practice of professional discourse, 137–185. Hong Kong: CUHK Press.Google Scholar

  • Halliday, M. A. K. 1973. Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

  • Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London & Baltimore: Edward Arnold & University Park Press.Google Scholar

  • Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. Spoken and written language. Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar

  • Halliday, M. A. K. 1996. On grammar and grammatics. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Carmel Cloran & David Butt (eds.), Functional descriptions: Theory into practice, 1–38. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Halliday, M. A. K. 1998. Things and relations: Regrammaticizing experience as technical knowledge. In J. R. Martin & Robert Veel (eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science, 185–235. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Halliday, M. A. K. 2002. On grammar, Jonathan Webster (ed.). London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

  • Halliday, M. A. K. 2002 [1981]. Text semantics and clause grammar: How is a text like a clause? In On grammar, Jonathan Webster (ed.), 219–260. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

  • Halliday, M. A. K. 2004 [1984]. Listening to Nigel [mimeograph]. Sydney University Linguistics Department. In The language of early childhood (Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday 4), Jonathan Webster (ed.), on accompanying CD. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

  • Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1985. Language, context and text: A social semiotic perspective. Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar

  • Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

  • Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2006. Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

  • Halliday, M. A. K., Angus McIntosh & Peter Strevens. 1964. The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1973. Code, register, and social dialect. In Basil Bernstein (ed.), Class, codes, and control: Applied studies towards a sociology of language, vol. 2, 253–292. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

  • Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1984. The nursery tale as a genre. Nottingham Linguistic Circular 13. 71–102.Google Scholar

  • Hyon, Sunny. 1996. Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly 30(4). 693–722.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jesuitas, Porfirio P., Lourdes R. Carale, Amelia E. Punzalan, Amelia C. Fajardo & Risa L. Reyes. 1999. Science for life 5. Pasig City: Anvil.Google Scholar

  • Lukin, Annabelle, Alison Moore, Maria Herke, Rebekah Wegener & Wu Canzhong. 2008. Halliday’s model of register revisited and explored. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 4(2). 187–243.Google Scholar

  • Mann, William C., Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Sandra A. Thompson. 1992. Rhetorical Structure Theory and text analysis. In William C. Mann & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund raising text, 39–78. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Martin, J. R. 1985. Factual writing: Exploring and challenging social reality. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar

  • Martin, J. R. 1992. Macro-proposals: Meaning by degree. In William C. Mann & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund raising text, 359–395. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Martin, J. R. 1993. Life as a noun. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin, Writing science: Literacy and discursive power, 221–267. London: Falmer.Google Scholar

  • Martin, J. R. & David Rose. 2008. Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar

  • Matthiessen, Christian M., I. M. Annabelle Lukin, David G. Butt, Chris Cleirigh & Christopher Nesbitt. 2005. Welcome to Pizza Hut: A case study of multistratal analysis. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 1. 123–150.Google Scholar

  • Matthiessen, Christian M., I. M. Diana Slade & Mary Macken. 1992. Language in context: A new model for evaluating student writing. Linguistics and Education 4(2). 173–195.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 1992. Interpreting the textual metafunction. In Martin Davies & Louise Ravelli (eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics: Recent theory and practice, 37–82. London: Pinter.Google Scholar

  • Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 1993. Register in the round: Diversity in a unified theory of register analysis. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Text and context in functional linguistics, 221–292. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 1995. Theme as an enabling resource in ideational “knowledge” construction. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Thematic developments in English texts, 20–55. London & New York: Pinter.Google Scholar

  • Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2002. Combining clauses into clause complexes: A multi-faceted view. In Joan Bybee & Michael Noonan (eds.), Complex sentences in grammar and discourse: Essays in honor of Sandra A. Thompson, 237–322. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2006a. Educating for advanced foreign language capacities: Exploring the meaning-making resources of languages systemic-functionally. In Heidi Byrnes (ed.), Advanced instructed language learning: The complementary contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky, 31–57. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

  • Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2006b. The multimodal page: A systemic functional exploration. In Terry D. Royce & Wendy L. Bowcher (eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse, 1–62. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2009. Meaning in the making: Meaning potential emerging from acts of meaning. Special issue, Language Learning 59 (Supplement 1). 211–235.Google Scholar

  • Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M., K. Teruya & M. Lam. 2010. Key terms in systemic functional linguistics. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

  • Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1988. The structure of discourse and “subordination.” In John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse, 275–329. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Parodi, Giovanni (ed.). 2010. Discourse genres in Spanish: Academic and professional connections. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Pun, K. H. 2011. Analysis of Hong Kong science textbooks using systemic functional approach. Unpublished Master Thesis, Department of English, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.Google Scholar

  • Pun, K. H. 2017. An exploratory study of the teaching and learning of secondary science through English in Hong Kong: Classroom interaction and perceptions of teachers and students. Unpublished DPhil (PhD) dissertation. Department of Education, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.Google Scholar

  • Schank, Roger C. & Robert P. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Teruya, Kazuhiro. 2007. A systemic functional grammar of Japanese, 2 vols. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

  • Unsworth, Len. 1995. How and why: Recontextualizing science explanations in school science books. Sydney: Sydney University dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Veel, Robert. 1997. Learning how to mean – scientifically speaking: Apprenticeship into scientific discourse in the secondary school. In Frances Christie & J. R. Martin (eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school, 161–195. London: Cassell.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2019-02-13

Published in Print: 2019-03-05


Citation Information: Semiotica, Volume 2019, Issue 227, Pages 31–76, ISSN (Online) 1613-3692, ISSN (Print) 0037-1998, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0045.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in