Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Semiotica

Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies / Revue de l'Association Internationale de Sémiotique

Editor-in-Chief: Danesi, Marcel


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.509

CiteScore 2018: 0.23

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.232
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.478

Agenzia Nazionale di Valutazione del Sistema Universitario e della Ricerca: Classe A

Online
ISSN
1613-3692
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 2019, Issue 227

Issues

The urgency of engaging with oddities and ambiguities: Reciprocity and cooperation visited as semio-aesthetic notions in bridging nature and culture

Jui-Pi Chien
  • Corresponding author
  • Foreign Languages and Literatures, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2019-02-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2017-0159

Abstract

The notion of the third culture forms the background of the study that seeks to unify humanistic and scientific approaches for a better appreciation of nature, culture, and the arts. This study draws on the kind of emotion and attitude that we may intuit and act out soon after noticing another individual demanding our help in nature and culture. Such feelings as sympathy and empathy, uncertainty and ambiguity, are perceived to be extremely useful in the context of strategy formation and action taking. These preverbal traits that are already more or less encoded in our body and mind may enable us to devise rewarding strategies emerging from the deep inside when we are coping with strange oddities in nature and culture. Such operation is seen on the one hand to save our biologically valuable time in terms of thinking and imagining, and on the other, to achieve brilliant interpretations of various art and life forms. This study reveals that we are estimated to come up with: (1) cogent and digestible propositions; (2) sharpened perceptions and refined tastes; (3) widened horizons of emulating and appreciating types of art and artifice. On top of polishing our own skills and swiftness of inventing strategies, we may also expect to forge encouraging and endearing partnerships between diverse life forms and us. All in all, this study develops the semio-aesthetic idea that we serve the community by way of developing balanced and intriguing viewpoints that may inspire individuals to regain linkages with beings and forms appearing unpleasant or unconvincing at first sight.

Keywords: the third culture; oddities and ambiguities; reciprocity and cooperation; sympathy and empathy; strategies and partnerships; propositions and intelligibility

References

  • Arbib, Michael A. 2012. How the brain got language: The mirror system hypothesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Axelrod, Robert & William D. Hamilton. 1981. The evolution of cooperation. Science 211(4489). 1390–1396.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baas, Matthijs, Carsten de Dreu & Bernard A. Nijstad. 2012. Emotions that associate with uncertainty lead to structured ideation. Emotion 12(5). 1004–1014.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bergson, Henri. 2004 [1912]. Matter and memory. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

  • Brockman, John. 1995. The third culture. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

  • Carter, Gerald. 2014. The reciprocity controversy. Animal Behavior and Cognition 1(3). 363–380.Google Scholar

  • Darwin, Charles. 2009a. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Darwin, Charles. 2009b. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1959. Course in general linguistics, Charles Bally, Albert Sechehaye & Albert Riedlinger (eds.), Wade Baskin (trans.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

  • de Waal, F. B. M. 2000. Attitudinal reciprocity in food sharing among brown capuchin monkeys. Animal Behaviour 60(2). 253–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • de Waal, Frans. 2006. Primates and philosophers: How morality evolved, Stephen Macedo & Josiah Ober (eds.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Dortier, Jean-François (ed.). 2015. Révolution dans nos origines. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

  • Eco, Umberto. 1979. Peirce and the semiotic foundations of openness: Signs as texts and texts as signs. In The role of the reader: Explorations in the semiotics of texts, 175–199. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

  • Eskine, Kendall J., Natalie A. Kacinik & Jesse J. Prinz. 2012. Stirring images: Fear, not happiness or arousal, makes art more sublime. Emotion 12(5). 1071–1074.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Flack, Jessica C. & Frans B. M. de Waal. 2000. “Any animal whatever”: Darwinian building blocks of morality in monkeys and apes. Journal of Consciousness Studies 7(1–2). 1–29.Google Scholar

  • Gombrich, Ernst. 1984a. Focus on the arts and humanities. In Tributes: Interpreters of our cultural tradition, 11–27. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

  • Gombrich, Ernst. 1984b. The high seriousness of play: Reflections on Homo ludens by J. Huizinga (1872–1945). In Tributes: Interpreters of our cultural tradition, 139–163. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

  • Greenspan, Patricia. 1988. Emotions and reasons: An inquiry into emotional justification. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Holton, Richard. 2011 [2009]. Willing, wanting, waiting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Huizinga, Johann. 1998 [1949]. Homo ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. London: Routledge & K. Paul.Google Scholar

  • Hume, David. 2007. An enquiry concerning human understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Jeannerod, Marc. 2005. How do we decipher others’ minds? In Michael A. Arbib & Jean-Marc Fellous (eds.), Who needs emotions?: The brain meets the robot, 147–169. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kant, Immanuel. 2000. Critique of the power of judgment Paul Guyer (ed. & trans. ), Eric Matthews (trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kendal, Jeremy, Jamshid J. Tehrani & John Odling-Smee. 2011. Human niche construction in interdisciplinary focus. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences 366. 785–792.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kitcher, Philip. 2006. Ethics and evolution: How to get here from there. In S. Macedo & J. Ober (eds.), Primates and philosophers: How morality evolved, 120–139. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Laland, Kevin, John Odling-Smee & John Endler. 2017. Niche construction, sources of selection, and trait coevolution. Interface Focus 7. 1–9.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Leder, Helmut & Michael Forster. 2016. Private and shared taste in art and face appreciation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10. 1–7.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Lenzi, Della, C. Trentini, P. Pantano, E. Macaluso, M. Iacoboni, G. L. Lenzi & M. Ammaniti. 2009. Neural basis of maternal communication and emotional expression processing during infant preverbal stage. Cerebral Cortex 19. 1124–1133.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lotman, Juri. 2011. The place of art among other modelling systems. Sign Systems Studies 39(2/4). 249–270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mathôt, Sebastiaan, Jonathan Grainer & Kristof Strijkers. 2017. Pupillary responses to words that convey a sense of brightness or darkness. Psychological Science 28(8). 1116–1124.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Molnar-Szakacs, Istvan & Lucina Q. Uddin. 2013. Self-processing and the default mode network: Interactions with the mirror neuron system. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7. 1–11.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1998. Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2 (1893–1913), Peirce Edition Project (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to vol. 2 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 2].Google Scholar

  • Rothenberg, David. 2011. Survival of the beautiful. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar

  • Schiller, Friedrich. 1993. On the sublime (toward the further development of some Kantian ideas). Concerning the sublime. In Walter Hinderer & Daniel O. Dahlstrom (eds.), Essays, 22–44; 70–85. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

  • Smith, Murray. 2017. Film, art, and the third culture: A naturalized aesthetics of film. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Starr, G. Gabrielle. 2013. Feeling beauty: The neuroscience of aesthetic experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Tomasello, Michael. 2016. A natural history of human morality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Tomasello, Michael & Amrisha Vaish. 2013. Origins of human cooperation and morality. Annual Review of Psychology 64. 231–255.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Tornatore, Giuseppe (dir.). 2013. The best offer [motion picture]. Rome: Paco Cinematografica.Google Scholar

  • Vessel, Edward A., G. Gabrielle Starr & Nava Rubin. 2013. Art reaches within: Aesthetic experience, the self and the default mode network. Frontiers in Neuroscience 7. 1–9.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Vessel, Edward A., Jonathan Stahl, Natalia Mauer, Alexander Denker & G. Gabrielle Starr. 2014. Personalized visual aesthetics. Proceedings of SPIE: Human Vision and Electronic Imaging 9(90140S). 1–8.Google Scholar

  • von Uexküll, Jakob. 2010. A foray into the worlds of animals and humans, with a theory of meaning. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

  • Wallisch, Pascal & Jake Alden Whritner. 2017. Strikingly low agreement in the appraisal of motion pictures. Projections 11(1). 102–120.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Wright, Robert. 2006. The uses of anthropomorphism. In S. Macedo & J. Ober (eds.), Primates and philosophers: How morality evolved, 83–97. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2019-02-13

Published in Print: 2019-03-05


Citation Information: Semiotica, Volume 2019, Issue 227, Pages 227–243, ISSN (Online) 1613-3692, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2017-0159.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in