Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Studia Humana

4 Issues per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2299-0518
See all formats and pricing




Towards New Probabilistic Assumptions in Business Intelligence

Andrew Schumann
  • University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow, Poland
  • :
/ Andrzej Szelc
  • University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow, Poland
  • :
Published Online: 2015-01-31 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sh-2015-0003

Abstract

One of the main assumptions of mathematical tools in science is represented by the idea of measurability and additivity of reality. For discovering the physical universe additive measures such as mass, force, energy, temperature, etc. are used. Economics and conventional business intelligence try to continue this empiricist tradition and in statistical and econometric tools they appeal only to the measurable aspects of reality. However, a lot of important variables of economic systems cannot be observable and additive in principle. These variables can be called symbolic values or symbolic meanings and studied within symbolic interactionism, the theory developed since George Herbert Mead and Herbert Blumer. In statistical and econometric tools of business intelligence we accept only phenomena with causal connections measured by additive measures. In the paper we show that in the social world we deal with symbolic interactions which can be studied by non-additive labels (symbolic meanings or symbolic values). For accepting the variety of such phenomena we should avoid additivity of basic labels and construct a new probabilistic method in business intelligence based on non-Archimedean probabilities.

Keywords:: business intelligence; additivity; measurability; non-additive measures; symbolic interactionism; symbolic value; non-Archimedean probabilities

References

  • 1. Althusser, Louis and Balibar, Étienne. Reading Capital. London: Verso, 2009.

  • 2. Arellano, M. Panel Data Econometrics. Oxford University Press, 2003.

  • 3. Blumer, H.G. George Herbert Mead and Human Conduct. 2004.

  • 4. Blumer, H.G. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. 1969.

  • 5. Bourdieu, P. Acts of Resistance: Against the Tyranny of the Market. New Press, 1999.

  • 6. Bourdieu, P. and L.J.D. Wacquant. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago and London: Univ of Chicago Press, 1992.

  • 7. Bourdieu, P. Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press, 1991.

  • 8. Bourdieu, P The Social Structures of the Economy. Polity 2005.

  • 9. Collected Works of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels. New York: International Publishers, 1988.

  • 10. Davidson, R., J.G. MacKinnon. Econometric Theory and Methods. Oxford University Press, 2004.

  • 11. McPherson, G. Statistics in Scientific Investigation: Its Basis, Application and Interpretation. Springer-Verlag, 1990.

  • 12. Mead, G.H. Mind, Self, and Society. Ed. by Charles W. Morris. University of Chicago Press, 1934.

  • 13. Mead, G.H. Movements of Thought in the Nineteenth Century. Ed. by C. W. Morris. University of Chicago Press, 1936.

  • 14. Mead, G.H. The Philosophy of the Act. Ed. by C.W. Morris et al. University of Chicago Press, 1938.

  • 15. Schumann, A. Unconventional Logics in Decision Making. Rzeszow: WSIiZ, 2014.

  • 16. Wooldridge, J.M. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge MA, MIT Press, 2002.


Published Online: 2015-01-31


Citation Information: Studia Humana. Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages 11–21, ISSN (Online) 2299-0518, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sh-2015-0003, January 2015

© 2015 Andrew Schumann and Andrzej Szelc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.