Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Face, Timothy L.

2 Issues per year

Online
ISSN
2199-3386
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Fine-grained and probabilistic cross-linguistic influence in the pronunciation of cognates: Evidence from corpus-based spontaneous conversation and experimentally elicited data

Esther L. Brown / Mark Amengual
Published Online: 2015-04-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2015-0003

Abstract

The present study examines variable realizations of Spanish word-initial voiced and voiceless dental stops in Spanish-English cognate pairs. Employing a variationist approach to naturalistic data, we report significantly decreased likelihood of reduced articulations of word-initial /d/ in cognates in spontaneous bilingual Puerto Rican discourse, and no such probabilistic effect for cognates in monolingual Spanish of the same speech community. Using experimentally controlled elicited data of Spanish word-initial /t/, we also find evidence of significant fine-grained effects of English on the articulations of Spanish cognates in the form of lengthened VOT for Spanish-English bilinguals. These results indicate that cross-language lexical connections affect phonetic categories in the speech production of Spanish-English bilinguals. It is proposed that both fine-grained and probabilistic effects of the phonology of one language on another can be explained within the Exemplar Model of Lexical Representation.

Keywords: bilingualism; cognates; exemplar model; variation; speech production; language contact

References

  • Abramson, Arthur & Leigh Lisker. 1973. Voice-timing perception in Spanish word-initial stops. Journal of Phonetics 1. 1–8.Google Scholar

  • Amengual, Mark. 2012. Interlingual influence in bilingual speech: Cognate status effect in a continuum of bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15. 517–530.Google Scholar

  • Amengual, Mark. 2013. An experimental approach to phonetic transfer in the production and perception of early Spanish-Catalan bilinguals. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Barlow, Jessica. 2002. The stop-spirant alternation in Spanish: Converging evidence for a fortition account. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 22. 51–86.Google Scholar

  • Barrutia, Richard & Armin Schwegler. 1994. Fonética y fonología españolas: teoría y práctica. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

  • Benkí, José. 2005. Perception of VOT and first formant onset by Spanish and English speakers. In James Cohen, Kara T. McAlister, Kellie Rolstad & Jeff MacSwan (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism, 240–248. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar

  • Best, Catherine T. 1995. A direct realist perspective on cross-language speech perception. In Winifred Strange (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, 171–204. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar

  • Bhatia, Tej K. & William C. Ritchie. 2013. The handbook of bilingualism and multilingualism. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 1999–2013. Praat: A system for doing phonetics by computer. [Computer program].Google Scholar

  • de Bot, Kees. 2004. The multilingual lexicon: Modeling selection and control. International Journal of Multilingualism 1. 17–32.Google Scholar

  • de Bot, Kees, Albert Cox, Steven Ralston, Anneli Schaufeli & Bert Weltens. 1995. Lexical processing in bilinguals. Second Language Research 11. 1–19.Google Scholar

  • Brown, Esther L. 2004. The reduction of syllable-initial /s/ in the Spanish of New Mexico and Southern Colorado: A usage-based approach. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Brown, Esther L. 2014. The role of discourse context frequency in phonological variation: A usage-based approach to bilingual speech production. [Special issue]. International Journal of Bilingualism. Catherine E. Travis and Rena Torres Cacoullos (eds.), Gauging convergence on the ground: Code-switching in the community, 19(4). 1–20.Google Scholar

  • Brown, Esther L. & David Harper. 2009. Phonological evidence of crosslinguistic exemplar connections. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 2. 257–274.Google Scholar

  • Brown, Esther L. & William D. Raymond. 2012. How discourse context shapes the lexicon: Explaining the distribution of Spanish f-/h- words. Diachronica 29. 139–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, Esther L. & Rena Torres-Cacoullos. 2002. ¿Qué le vamoh aher?: Taking the syllable out of Spanish /s/ reduction. In Daniel E. Johnson & Tara Sánchez (eds.), University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 8(3). (Papers from NWAV 30), 17–31. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

  • Bullock, Barbara E. & Chip Gerfen. 2004. Phonological convergence in a contracting language variety. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7. 95–104.Google Scholar

  • Bullock, Barbara E. & Almeida Jacqueline Toribio. 2009. Trying to hit a moving target: On the sociophonetics of code-switching. In Ludmila Isurin, Donald Winford & Kees de Bot (eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to code switching, 189–206. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bybee, Joan. 2002. Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14. 261–290.Google Scholar

  • Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Caisse, Michelle. 1982 Cross-linguistic differences in fundamental frequency perturbation induced by voiceless unaspirated stops. Berkeley, CA: University of California MA thesis.Google Scholar

  • Campos-Astorkiza, Rebeka. 2014. The phonemes of Spanish. In José Ignacio Hualde, Antxon Olarrea & Erin O’Rouke (eds.), The handbook of Hispanic Linguistics, 89–110. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Caramazza, Alfonso. 1997. How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology 14. 177–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Caramazza, Alfonso & Isabel Brones. 1979. Lexical access in bilinguals. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13(4). 212–214.Google Scholar

  • Caramazza, Alfonso, Grace H. Yeni-Komshian, Edgar B. Zurif & Ettore Carbone. 1973. The acquisition of a new phonological contrast: The case of stop consonants in French-English bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 54. 421–428.Google Scholar

  • Cho, Taehong & Peter Ladefoged. 1999 Variation and universals in VOT: Evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics 27. 207–229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Coetzee, Andries W. & Joe Pater. 2014. The place of variation in phonological theory. In John A. Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan C. L. Yu (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, 401–434. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Cole, Jennifer, José I. Hualde & Khalil Iskarous. 1999. Effects of prosodic and segmental context on /g/-Lenition in Spanish. In Osamu Fujimura, Brian D. Joseph & Bohumil Palek (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Linguistics and Phonetics Conference, 575–589.Prague: Charles University Press.Google Scholar

  • Coleman, John. 2002. Phonetic representations in the mental lexicon. In Jacques Durand & Bernard Laks (eds.), Phonetics, phonology and cognition, 96–130. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Cortés-Torres, Mayra E. 2005. La perífrasis estar + −ndo en el español puertorriqueño: variación dialectal o contacto lingüístico? Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Costa, Albert, Alfonso Caramazza & Nuria Sebastián-Gallés. 2000. The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of lexical Access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 26(5). 1283–1296.Google Scholar

  • Costa, Albert, Wido La Heij & Eduardo Navarrete. 2006. The dynamics of bilingual lexical access. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 9. 137–151.Google Scholar

  • Costa, Albert, Mikel Santesteban & Agnes Caño. 2005. On the facilitatory effects of cognate words in bilingual speech production. Brain and Language 94. 94–103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cristoffanini, Paula, Kim Kirsner & Dan Milech. 1986. Bilingual lexical representation: The status of Spanish-English cognates. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 38A(3). 367–393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davies, Mark. 2002. Corpus del español (100 million words, 1200s–1900s). http://www.corpusdelespanol.org.

  • Dijkstra, Ton, Jonathan Grainger & Walter J. B. van Heuven. 1999. Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language 41(4). 496–518.Google Scholar

  • Docherty, Gerard J. 1992. The timing of voicing in English obstruents. Berlin: Foris.Google Scholar

  • Eddington, David. 2011. What are the contextual phonetic variants of /β,ð,γ/ in colloquial Spanish? Probus 23. 1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ernestus, Mirjam & R. Harald Baayen. 2014. Corpora and exemplars in phonology. In John A. Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan C. L. Yu (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, 374–400. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • File-Muriel, Rich & Earl K. Brown. 2011. The gradient nature of s-lenition in Caleño Spanish. Language Variation and Change 23. 223–243.Google Scholar

  • Flege, James. 1987. The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of bilingual classification. Journal of Phonetics 15. 47–65.Google Scholar

  • Flege, James. 1995. Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In Winifred Strange (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, 229–273. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar

  • Flege, James. 2003. Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. In Antje S. Meyer & Niels O. Schiller (eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production, differences and similarities, 319–355. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Flege, James. 2007. Language contact in bilingualism: Phonetic system interactions. In Jennifer Cole & José I. Hualde (eds.), Laboratory phonology 9, 353–380. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Flege, James & Wieke Eefting. 1986. Linguistic and developmental effects on the production and perception of stop consonants. Phonetica 43. 155–171.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Foulkes, Paul. 2010. Exploring social-indexical knowledge: A long past but a short history. Journal of Laboratory Phonology 1. 5–39.Google Scholar

  • Fowler, Carol, Valery Sramko, David Ostry, Sarah Rowland & Pierre Hallé. 2008. Cross language phonetic influences on the speech of French-English bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics 36. 649–663.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gilquin, Gaetanelle & Stefan Th. Gries. 2009. Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the-art review. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5. 1–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gollan, Tamar H., Kenneth I. Forster & Ram Frost. 1997. Translation priming with different scripts: Masked priming with cognates and noncognates in Hebrew-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 23(5). 1122–1139.Google Scholar

  • González, Carolina. 2002. Phonetic variation in voiced obstruents in North-Central Peninsular Spanish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 32. 17–31.Google Scholar

  • González López, Verónica. 2012. Spanish and English word-initial voiceless stop production in code-switched vs. monolingual structures. Second Language Research 28(2). 243–263.Google Scholar

  • Gries, Stefan Th. 2010. Useful statistics for corpus linguistics. In Aquilino Sánchez & Moisés Almela (eds.), A mosaic of corpus linguistics, 269–291. Peter Lang: Frankfurt.Google Scholar

  • Gries, Stefan Th. & Dagmar Divjak. 2012. Frequency effects in language learning and processing. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Groot, Annette M. B. de 1992. Bilingual lexical representations: A closer look at conceptual representations. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning, 389–412. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

  • Groot, Annette M. B. de 1995. Determinants of bilingual lexicosemantic organisation. Computer Assisted Language Learning 8. 151–181.Google Scholar

  • Groot, Annette M. B. de, Susanne Borgwaldt, Mieke Bos & Ellen van den Eijnden. 2002. Lexical decision and word naming in bilinguals: Language effects and task effects. Journal of Memory and Language 47(1). 91–124.Google Scholar

  • Grosjean, François. 1982. Life with two languages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Grosjean, François. 1985. The bilingual as a competent but specific speaker-hearer. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 6. 467–477.Google Scholar

  • Grosjean, François. 1998. Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1. 131–149.Google Scholar

  • Grosjean, François & Carlos Soares. 1986. Processing mixed language: Some preliminary findings. In Jyotsna Vaid (ed.), Language processing in bilinguals: Psycholinguistic and neuropsychological perspectives, 145–179. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Guion, Susan G. 2003. The vowel systems of Quichua-Spanish bilinguals. Phonetica 60. 98–128.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hualde, José I., Miquel Simonet & Marianna Nadeu. 2011. Consonant lenition and phonological recategorization. Laboratory Phonology 2(2). 301–329.Google Scholar

  • Jarvis, Scott & Aneta Pavlenko. 2008. Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Jurafsky, Dan, Alan Bell, Michelle Gregory & William D. Raymond. 2001. Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. In Joan Bybee & Paul Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 229–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Kent, Raymond D. & Charles Read. 1992. The acoustic analysis of speech. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar

  • Kessinger, Rachel H. & Sheila E. Blumstein. 1997. Effects of speaking rate on voice-onset time in Thai, French, and English. Journal of Phonetics 25. 143–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kroll, Judith F., Cari A. Bogulski & Rhonda McClain. 2012. Psycholinguistic perspectives on second language learning and bilingualism: The course and consequence of cross-language competition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 2. 1–24.Google Scholar

  • Labov, William. 1981. Resolving the neogrammarian controversy. Language 57. 267–308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Langacker, Ronald. 2000. Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Langdon, Henriette W. & Barbara J. Merino. 1992. Acquisition and development of a second language. In Henriette W. Langdon & Li-Rang L. Cheng (eds.), Hispanic children and adults with communication disorders: Assessment and intervention, 132–167. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar

  • Lemhöfer, Kristin, Ton Dijkstra & Marije Michel. 2004. Three languages, one ECHO: Cognate effects in trilingual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes 19. 585–611.Google Scholar

  • Lewandowski, Natalie. 2009. Sociolinguistic factors in language proficiency: Phonetic convergence as a signature of pronunciation talent. In Grzegorz Dogil & Susanne M. Reiterer (eds.), Language talent and brain activity, 257–278. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Lisker, Leigh & Arthur Abramson. 1964. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word 20. 384–422.Google Scholar

  • MacLeod, Andrea, Carol Stoel-Gammon & Alicia Wassink. 2009. Production of high vowels in Canadian English and Canadian French: A comparison of early bilingual and monolingual speakers. Journal of Phonetics 37. 374–387.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maddieson, Ian. 1984. Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Martínez-Gil, Fernando. 2014. Main phonological processes. In José I. Hualde, Antxon Olarrea & Erin O’Rouke (eds.), The handbook of Hispanic Linguistics, 111–132. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Meyerhoff, Miriam. 2009. Replication, transfer, and calquing: Using variation as a tool in the study of language contact. Language Variation and Change 21. 297–317.Google Scholar

  • Mora, Joan C. & Marianna Nadeu. 2012. L2 effects on the perception and production of a native vowel contrast in early bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism 16. 484–499.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Olson, Daniel. 2013. Bilingual language switching and selection at the phonetic level: Asymmetrical transfer in VOT production. Journal of Phonetics 41. 407–420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ortiz López, Luis A. 2000. Extensión de estar en contextos de ser en el español de Puerto Rico: ¿evaluación interna y/o contacto de lenguas? BAPLE, 98–118.Google Scholar

  • Pallier, Christoph, Laura Bosch & Nuria Sebastián-Gallés. 1997. A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception. Cognition 64. B9–B17.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Phillips, Betty S. 2001. Lexical diffusion, lexical frequency, and lexical analysis. In Joan Bybee & Paul Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 123–136. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Phillips, Betty S. 2006. Word frequency and lexical diffusion. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2001. Why phonological constraints are so coarse-grained. Language and Cognitive Processes 16. 691–698.Google Scholar

  • Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2006. The next toolkit. Journal of Phonetics 34. 516–530.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Poplack, Shana. 2000. The English history of African American English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Poplack, Shana & Sali Tagliamonte. 2001. African American English in the diaspora. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Port, Robert & Adam Leary. 2005. Against formal phonology. Language 81. 927–964.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Quilis, Antonio. 1997. Principios de fonología y fonética españolas. Madrid: Arcos Libros, S.A.Google Scholar

  • Raymond, William D. & Esther L. Brown. 2012. Are effects of word frequency effects of context of use? An analysis of initial fricative reduction in Spanish. In Stefan Th. Gries & Dagmar S. Divjak (eds.), Frequency effects in language, vol. 2: Learning and processing, 35–52. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Sankoff, David, Sali Tagliamonte & Eric Smith. 2005. GoldVarb X: A variable rule application for Macintosh and Windows. [Computer program].Google Scholar

  • Sanchez-Casas, Rosa, Christopher Davis & José Garcia-Albea. 1992. Bilingual lexical processing: Exploring the cognate-noncognate distinction. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 4. 293–310.Google Scholar

  • Sebastián-Gallés, Nuria & Salvador Soto-Faraco. 1999. Online processing of native and non-native phonemic contrasts in early bilinguals. Cognition 72. 111–123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Solé, Maria Josep. 1997. Timing patterns in the production of a foreign language. In Lourdes Díaz & Carmen Pérez (eds.), Views on the acquisition and use of a second language (Proceedings of EUROSLA 97), 539–551. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar

  • Simonet, Miquel. 2014. Phonetic consequences of dynamic cross-linguistic interference in proficient bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics 43. 26–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sundara, Megha & Linda Polka. 2008. Discrimination of coronal stops by bilingual adults: The timing and nature of language interaction. Cognition 106. 234–258.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Sundara, Megha, Linda Polka & Shari Baum. 2006. Production of coronal stops by simultaneous bilingual adults. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 9. 97–114.Google Scholar

  • Teschner, Richard V. 2000. Camino oral: fonética, fonología y práctica de los sonidos del español, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

  • Waltermire, Mark. 2011. Frequency effects on the morphological conditioning of syllable-final /s/ reduction in border Uruguayan Spanish. Journal of Language Contact 4. 26–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Williams, Lee. 1977. The voicing contrast in Spanish. Journal of Phonetics 5. 169–184.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-04-29

Published in Print: 2015-05-01


Citation Information: Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 59–83, ISSN (Online) 2199-3386, ISSN (Print) 1939-0238, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2015-0003.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Šárka Šimáčková and Václav Podlipský
Languages, 2018, Volume 3, Number 3, Page 34
[3]
Natalia Kartushina, Ulrich H. Frauenfelder, and Narly Golestani
Language Learning, 2016, Volume 66, Number S2, Page 155
[5]
Jasmin Sadat, Clara D. Martin, James S. Magnuson, François-Xavier Alario, and Albert Costa
Cognitive Science, 2016, Volume 40, Number 8, Page 1911

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in