Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Face, Timothy L.

Online
ISSN
2199-3386
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Perceptual salience and social categorization of contact features in Asturian Spanish

Sonia Barnes
Published Online: 2015-08-25 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2015-0009

Abstract

This article investigates the sociolinguistic perception of contact features in Asturian Spanish, a linguistic variety spoken in Northwestern Spain and characterized by the alternation between features from Asturian and Spanish. A matched guise experiment was used to test the participants’ social categorization of the following morphophonological variants: Asturian [u] and [es] vs. Spanish [o] and [as], respectively. The manipulation of the variants had a significant effect on how listeners perceived the social attributes of the speakers. However, while both variables were used to situate speakers in an urban/rural spectrum, only (o) was associated with status. The results of this study show that individual contact variants can index social information and that not all contact features are equally salient. I propose that, in this case, social salience is determined by the cognitive salience of the variables under study and the transparency of the link between linguistic form and social information.

Keywords: Sociolinguistic perception; morphophonological variation; language contact; social status

References

  • Antón, Marta. 1995. Asturiano y castellano en Llangréu: aspectos sociolingüísticos de la pronunciación de las vocales. Lletres Asturianes 56. 73–85.Google Scholar

  • Auer, Peter, Birgit Barden & Beate Grosskopf. 1998. Subjective and objective parameters determining ‘salience’ in long-term dialect accommodation. Journal of Sociolinguisitcs 2. 163–187.Google Scholar

  • Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen. 1987. Markedness and salience in second-language acquisition. Language Learning 37. 385–407.Google Scholar

  • Barnes, Sonia. 2013. Morphophonological variation in urban Asturian Spanish: Language contact and regional identity. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Barnes, Sonia & Scott Schwenter. 2013. An implicational hierarchy of contact features in Asturian Spanish. Paper presented at the 24th Conference on Spanish in the United States and 9th Conference on Spanish in Contact with other Languages, McAllen, TX, 6–9 March.

  • Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker & Steven Walker. 2014. lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–7, http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html (accessed 23 October 2014).

  • Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2009. The nature of sociolinguistic perception. Language Variation and Change 21. 135–156.Google Scholar

  • Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2010. Sociolinguistics and perception. Language and Linguistics Compass 4. 377–389.Google Scholar

  • Carabaña Morales Julio & Carmuca Gómez Bueno. 1996. Escalas de prestigio profesional. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.Google Scholar

  • Carranza, Michael A. & Ellen Bouchard Ryan. 1975. Evaluative reactions of bilingual Anglo and Mexican American adolescents towards speakers of English and Spanish. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 6. 83–104.Google Scholar

  • Casesnoves Ferrer, Raquel. 2010. Changing linguistic attitudes in Valencia: The effects of language planning measures. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14. 477–500.Google Scholar

  • Clopper, Cynthia G. & David B. Pisoni. 2004. Some acoustic cues for the perceptual categorization of American English regional dialects. Journal of Phonetics 32. 111–140.Google Scholar

  • D’Andrés, Ramón. 1993. Encuesta sociollingüística nuna parroquia Asturiana: Deva-Xixón. Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo.Google Scholar

  • D’Andrés, Ramón. 1996. Encuestas sociolingüísticas sobre el asturiano. Las variables edad y sexo. Revista de Filología Románica 13. 371–387.Google Scholar

  • D’Andrés, Ramón. 2002a. Juicios sobre la lengua asturiana. Oviedo: Ámbitu.Google Scholar

  • D’Andrés, Ramón. 2002b. L’asturianu mínimu urbanu. Delles hipótesis.’ Lletres Asturianes 81. 21–38.Google Scholar

  • Eckert, Penelope. 1989. The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change 1. 245–267.Google Scholar

  • Ferguson, Charles A. 1964. Diglossia. In Dell H. Hymes (ed.), Language in Culture and Society, 429–439. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

  • Fridland, Valerie, Kathryn Bartlett & Roger Kreuz. 2004. Do you hear what I hear? Experimental measurement of the perceptual salience of acoustically manipulated vowel variants by Southern speakers in Memphis, TN. Language Variation and Change 16. 1–16.Google Scholar

  • Garcia Arias, Xose Lluis. 1982. Las lenguas minoritarias de la Península Ibérica. In Francisco Abad Nebot & Antonio García Berrio (eds.) Introducción a la Lingüística. 417–454. Madrid: Alhambra Universidad.Google Scholar

  • Garcia Arias, Xose Lluis. 2002. Breve reseña sobre la lengua asturiana. Informe sobre la lengua asturiana. 15–25. Oviedo: Academia de la Llingua Asturiana.Google Scholar

  • Garcia Arias, Xose Lluis. 2003. Gramática histórica de la lengua asturiana. Oviedo: Academia de la Llingua Asturiana.Google Scholar

  • García de Diego, Vicente. 1978. Dialectología española. Madrid: Ediciones Cultura Hispánica del Centro Iberoamericano de Cooperación.Google Scholar

  • Gómez Molina, José Ramón. 1998. Actitudes lingüísticas en una comunidad bilingüe y multilectal. Área metropolitana de Valencia. Anejo XXVIII, Cuadernos de Filología. Valencia, Spain: Universitat de València.Google Scholar

  • González-Quevedo, Roberto. 2001. The Asturian speech community. In M. Teresa Turell (ed.), Multilingualism in Spain: Sociolinguistic and psycolinguistic aspects of linguistic minority groups, 165–182. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

  • Hickey, Raymond. 2000. Salience, stigma and standard. In Laura Wright (ed.), The development of standard English 1300–1800. Theories, descriptions, conflicts, 57–72. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hume, Elizabeth. 1998. The role of perceptibility in consonant/consonant metathesis. Proceedings of West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 17. 293–307.Google Scholar

  • Johnstone, Barbara, Jennifer Andrus & Andrew E. Danielson. 2006. Mobility, indexicality, and the enregisterment of “Pittsburghese.” Journal of English Linguistics 34. 77–104.Google Scholar

  • Johnstone, Barbara & Scott F. Kiesling. 2008. Indexicality and experience: Variation and identity in Pittsburgh. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12. 5–33.Google Scholar

  • Kerswill, Paul & Ann Williams. 2002. ‘Salience’ as an explanatory factor in language change: Evidence from dialect leveling in urban England. Contributions to the Sociology of Language 86. 81–110.Google Scholar

  • Konvalinka, Nancy A. 1985. La situación sociolingüística de Asturias. Lletres Asturianes 16. 29–65.Google Scholar

  • Lambert, Wallace E., R. C. Hodgson, Robert C. Gardner & Samuel Fillenbaum. 1960. Evaluational reactions to spoken language. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60. 44–51.Google Scholar

  • Llera Ramo, Francisco J. & Pablo San Martín Antuña. 2003. II Estudio sociolingüístico de Asturias. Oviedo: Academia de la Llingua Asturiana.Google Scholar

  • Loureiro-Rodriguez, Veronica, May M. Boggess & Anne Goldsmith. 2013. Language attitudes in Galicia: Using the matched-guise test among high school students. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 34. 136–153.Google Scholar

  • Neira, Jesús. 1976. El bable: estructura e historia. Salinas: Ayalga.Google Scholar

  • Newman, Michael, Mireia Trenchs-Parera & Shukhan Ng. 2008. Normalizing bilingualism: The effects of the Catalonian linguistic normalization policy one generation after. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12. 306–333.Google Scholar

  • Plichta, Bartek & Dennis R. Preston. 2005. The /ay/s have it: The perception of /ay/ as a North-South stereotype in US English. In Tore Kristiansen, Nikolas Coupland & Peter Garrett (eds.), Theme issue: Subjective processes in language variation and change, Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 37. 243–285.Google Scholar

  • R Development Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

  • Rácz, Péter. 2013. Salience in sociolinguistics: A quantitative approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Rickford, John A. 2002. Implicational scales. In J. K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change. 142–167. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Rose Alcorta, Pilar. 2000. Estudiu socio-llingüísticu en Candás. Resultaos d’una encuesta. Lletres Asturianes 75. 7–26.Google Scholar

  • Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23. 193–229.Google Scholar

  • Squires, Lauren. 2013. It don’t go both ways: Limited bidirectionality in sociolinguistic perception. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17. 200–237.Google Scholar

  • Torbert, Benjamin C. 2010. The salience of two southern vowel variants: Fronted /o/ and weak-glided /ai/. Southern Journal of Linguistics 34. 1–36.Google Scholar

  • Treiman, Donald J. 1977. Occupational prestige in comparative perspective. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

  • Trudgill, Peter. 1972. Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1. 179–195.Google Scholar

  • Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Vanek, Christian & Scott McDaniel. 2006. Surveygizmo. Widgix, LLC.

  • Viejo Fernández, Xulio. 2004. Asturian: Resurgence and impending demise of a minority language in the Iberian Peninsula. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 170. 169–190.Google Scholar

  • Walker, Abby, Christina García, Yomi Cortés & Kathryn Campbell-Kibler. 2014. Comparing social meanings across listeners and speaker groups: The indexical field of Spanish /s/. Language Variation and Change 26. 169–189.Google Scholar

  • Woolard, Kathryn A. 1989. Double talk: Bilingualism and the politics of ethnicity in Catalonia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Woolard, Kathryn A. 1997. Between friends: Gender, peer group structure and bilingualism in urban Catalonia. Language in Society 26. 533–560.Google Scholar

  • Woolard, Kathryn A. & Tae-Joong Gahng. 1990. Changing language policies and attitudes in autonomous Catalonia. Language in Society 19. 311–330.Google Scholar

  • Zamora Vicente, Alonso. 1960. Dialectología española. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-08-25

Published in Print: 2015-09-01


Citation Information: Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 213–241, ISSN (Online) 2199-3386, ISSN (Print) 1939-0238, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2015-0009.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Whitney Chappell
Language Variation and Change, 2016, Volume 28, Number 3, Page 357

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in