Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton May 20, 2016

Pronominal verbs in Spanish

  • Grant Armstrong EMAIL logo

Abstract

Pronominal verbs (PVs) are a morphological form class of intransitive verbs in Spanish such as acatarrar-se (= to get a cold) and quejar-se (= to complain) that are obligatorily marked with the reflexive, or se, clitic. The main objective of this paper is to propose a solution to the following puzzle: PVs represent a heterogeneous set of argument structure configurations but are formally marked in the same way. In order to do so, I empirically motivate the existence of two different argument structure configurations within the class of PVs, unaccusative and unergative. I then show that what makes these configurations unique is that they contain a deficiency in Voice, in the form of unchecked formal features. This deficiency has a different source in each configuration: it is an unchecked categorial D-feature in unaccusatives and unvalued phi-features in unergatives. The reason why these two configurations are marked in the same way is because, as proposed in Pujalte and Saab (2012, Syncretism as PF-repair: The case of se-insertation in Spanish. In Maria C. Cuervo & Yves Roberge (eds.), The end of argument structure? 229–260. Bingley, UK: Emerald Press.), the se clitic paradigm is used as a general repair mechanism to eliminate unchecked D and phi features on Voice post-syntactically.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Erwin Lares for his help organizing the existing literature on this subject, collecting data and discussing many aspects of this paper. I would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers and editors of Studies in Hispanic & Lusophone Linguistics for helpful comments. This research was supported by a grant obtained by the author from the UW-Madison Graduate School–s Fall Competition 2013, project #PRJ71LP.

References

Alexiadou, Artemis. 2014. Roots don’t take complements. Theoretical Linguistics 40. 287–297.10.1515/tl-2014-0012Search in Google Scholar

Alexiadou, Artemis & Florian Schäfer. 2014. Towards a non-uniform analysis of naturally reflexive verbs. In Robert E. Santana-LaBarge (ed.), Proceedings of WCCFL 31, 1–10. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Search in Google Scholar

Aranovich, Raúl. 2000. Split intransitivity and reflexives in Spanish. Probus 12. 165–186.10.1515/prbs.2000.12.2.165Search in Google Scholar

Armstrong, Grant. To appear. Spanish participios activos are adjectival antipassives. The Linguistic Review.10.1515/tlr-2016-0007Search in Google Scholar

Basilico, David. 2012. The antipassive and its relation to scalar structure. In María C. Cuervo & Yves Roberge (eds.), The end of argument structure? 75–103. Bingley, UK: Emerald Press.10.1108/S0092-4563(2012)0000038006Search in Google Scholar

Bogard, Sergio. 2006. El clítico se. Valores y evolución. In Concepción Company (dir.), Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Primera parte: La frase verbal, vol. 2, 755–870. Mexico City: UNAM/Fondo de cultura económica.Search in Google Scholar

Borer, Hagit. 2005. The normal course of events. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bowers, John. 2010. Arguments as relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262014311.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Burzio, Luigi. 1991. The morphological basis of anaphora. Journal of Linguistics 2. 81–105.10.1017/S0022226700012421Search in Google Scholar

Campos, Héctor & Paula Kempchinsky. 1991. Case absorption, theta structure and pronominal verbs. In Dieter Wanner & Douglas Kibbee (eds.), New analyses in Romance linguistic, 171–185. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.69.15camSearch in Google Scholar

Cano Aguilar, Rafael. 1999. Los complementos de régimen verbal. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. 2, 1807–1854. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Search in Google Scholar

Chierchia, Gennaro. 2004. A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. In Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle: Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface, 22–69, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels, Juan Uriagereka & Samuel J. Keyser (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–156. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Coon, Jessica. To appear. Mayan morphosyntax. Language and Linguistic Compass.10.1111/lnc3.12149Search in Google Scholar

Cuervo, María Cristina. 2003. Datives at large. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Cuervo, María Cristina. 2014a. Alternating unaccusatives and distribution of roots. Lingua 141. 48–70.10.1016/j.lingua.2013.12.001Search in Google Scholar

Cuervo, María Cristina. 2014b. Arguments for a root. Theoretical Linguistics 40. 375–387.10.1515/tl-2014-0018Search in Google Scholar

Embick, David. 2004. On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry 35. 355–392.10.1162/0024389041402634Search in Google Scholar

Folli, Raffaella. 2002. Construction telicity in English and Italian. Oxford, UK: Oxford University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hale, Ken & Keyser, Samuel J. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Ken Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hale, Ken & Keyser, Samuel J. 2002. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5634.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi. 1995. Subjects, events and licensing. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi. 2014. On the identity of roots. Theoretical Linguistics 40. 225–276.10.1515/tl-2014-0010Search in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi & Rolf Noyer. 2000. Formal versus encyclopedic properties of vocabulary: Evidence from nominalisations. In Bert Peeters (ed.), The lexicon-encyclopedia interface, 349–374. Oxford, UK: Elsevier10.1163/9780585474465_014Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and transitivity, 87–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.23.05hasSearch in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard. 2009. Antisymmetry and the lexicon. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 8. 1–31.10.1075/livy.8.01kaySearch in Google Scholar

Koontz-Garboden, Andrew. 2009. Anticausativization. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27. 77–138.10.1007/s11049-008-9058-9Search in Google Scholar

Kramer, Ruth. 2014. Clitic doubling or object agreement: The view from Amharic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32. 593–635.10.1007/s11049-014-9233-0Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 2000. Building statives. In Lisa J. Conathan, Jeff Good, Darya Kavitskaya, Alyssa B. Wulf & Alan C. L. Yu (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 385–399. Berkeley, CA: UC Berkeley Linguistics Society.10.3765/bls.v26i1.1131Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth. 1999. Objecthood: An event structure perspective. In Sabrina J. Billings, John P. Boyle & Aaron M. Griffith (eds.), Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society 35, vol. 1: The main session, 223–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lidz, Jeff. 2001. The argument structure of verbal reflexives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19. 311–353.10.1023/A:1010676623092Search in Google Scholar

MacDonald, Jonathan E. 2008. The syntax of inner aspect: A minimalist approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.133Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1991. Case and licensing. In German Westphal, Benjamin Ao & Hee-Rahk Chae (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (ESCOL 8), 234–253. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 2013. Verbal argument structure: Events and participants. Lingua 130. 152–168.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.10.012Search in Google Scholar

Masullo, Pascual José. 1992a. Incorporation and case theory in Spanish: A cross linguistic perspective. Seattle, WA: University of Washington dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Masullo, Pascual José. 1992b. Antipassive constructions in Spanish. In Paul Hirschbühler & E. F. K. Koerner (eds.), Romance languages and modern linguistic theory, 175–194. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.91.13masSearch in Google Scholar

Mateu, Jaume. 2002. Argument structure: Relational construal at the syntax-semantics interface. Barcelona: Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

McIntyre, Andrew. 2013. Adjectival passives and adjectival participles in English. In Artemis Alexiadou & Florian Schäfer (eds.), Non-canonical passives, 21–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.205.02mciSearch in Google Scholar

Mendikoetxea, Amaya. 1997. Clitics as AGR, and PRO in finite clauses. In Natàlia Català & Maria Bargalló (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Colloquium on Generative Grammar, 84–121. Tarragona: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universitat Rovira I Virgili.Search in Google Scholar

Mendikoetxea, Amaya. 1999. Construcciones inacusativas y pasivas. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. 2, 1575–1629. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Search in Google Scholar

Mendikoetxea, Amaya. 2012. Passives and se constructions. In José I. Hualde, Antxon Olarrea & Erin O‘Rourke (eds.), The handbook of Hispanic linguistics, 477–502. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.10.1002/9781118228098.ch23Search in Google Scholar

Ormazabal, Javier & Juan Romero. 2013. Object clitics, agreement and dialectal variation. Probus 25. 301–344.10.1515/probus-2013-0012Search in Google Scholar

Otero, Carlos P. 1999. Pronombres reflexivos y recíprocos. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. 1, 1429–1517. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Search in Google Scholar

Polinsky, Maria. 2013. Antipassive constructions. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Plank Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/108)Search in Google Scholar

Preminger, Omer. 2011. Agreement as a fallible operation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Pujalte, Mercedes & Andrés Saab. 2012. Syncretism as PF-repair: The case of se-insertation in Spanish. In Maria C. Cuervo & Yves Roberge (eds.), The end of argument structure? 229–260. Bingley, UK: Emerald Press.10.1108/S0092-4563(2012)0000038012Search in Google Scholar

Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first phase syntax. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486319Search in Google Scholar

Reinhart, Tanya & Eric Reuland. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24. 657–720Search in Google Scholar

Reinhart, Tanya & Tal Siloni. 2005. The lexicon-syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 389–43610.1162/0024389054396881Search in Google Scholar

Reuland, Eric. 2011. Anaphora and language design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.1093/obo/9780199772810-0050Search in Google Scholar

Sanz, Monserrat. 2000. Events and predication: A new approach to syntactic processing in English and Spanish. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.207Search in Google Scholar

Schäfer, Florian. 2008. The syntax of (anti-)causatives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.126Search in Google Scholar

Spreng, Bettina. 2005. Events in Inuktitut: Voice alternations and viewpoint aspect. In Rodney L. Edwards, Patrick J. Midtlyng, Colin L. Sprague & Kjersti G. Stensrud (eds.), Proceedings from the main session of the 41st meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 473–489. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.Search in Google Scholar

Suñer, Margarita. 1982. The syntax and semantics of presentational sentence types in Spanish. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Teomiro, Ismael. 2010. Anaphors at the interfaces. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM) dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Torrego, Esther. 1989. Unergative–unaccusative alternations in Spanish. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10. 253–269.Search in Google Scholar

Torrego, Esther. 1995. From argumental to non-argumental pronouns: Spanish doubled reflexives. Probus 7. 221–241.10.1515/prbs.1995.7.2.221Search in Google Scholar

Varela, Soledad. 2002. Active or subjective adjectival-participles in Spanish. In James F. Lee, Kimberly L. Geeslin & J. Clancy Clements (eds.), Structure, meaning and acquisition in Spanish: Papers from the 4th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 304–316. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wehrli, Eric. 1986. On some properties of the French clitic se. In Hagit Borer (ed.), The syntax of pronominal clitics, syntax and semantics 19, 263–283. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004373150_012Search in Google Scholar

Zavala, Roberto. 1997. Functional analysis of Akatek voice constructions. International Journal of American Linguistics 63. 439–474.10.1086/466340Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-5-20
Published in Print: 2016-5-1

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 19.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/shll-2016-0002/html
Scroll to top button