Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Face, Timothy L.

Online
ISSN
2199-3386
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The role of social networks in the retention of /f/ aspiration among Mexican migrant workers in the Pacific Northwest

Jackelyn Van Buren
Published Online: 2017-05-02 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2017-0005

Abstract

Fricative /f/ aspiration (i. e., /f/ -> [h] in words such as afuera ‘outside’ and fui ‘went.1sg’) is a nonstandard rural feature of Spanish that occurs in a Pacific Northwest speech community of migrant farmworkers of Mexican descent. While the historical change in Spanish from /f/ > [h] has an extensive literature (see Naro 1972; Penny 1990; Pensado 1993; Torreblanca 1984), the social and linguistic factors that condition the variable’s synchronic use are poorly understood (Renaud 2014). This study examines the current trajectory of /f/ aspiration in the context of migration in the U.S., utilizing sociolinguistic interviews conducted with 28 participants ranging in age from 17 to 71, born in either Mexico or the U.S. The study demonstrates that speakers who are more tightly integrated into local family and agriculture networks are more likely to produce [h]. A significant interaction between gender and age is also found: while women of all ages are sensitive to the standard variant and use less of the stigmatized variant [h] overall, young men are robust producers of [h]. It is suggested that this variant holds covert prestige among men of Mexican descent working in agriculture in the migrant setting of the Pacific Northwest.

Keywords: U.S. Spanish; migration; fricatives; gender; social networks

References

  • Boersma, Paul. 2001. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 5(9/10). 341–345.Google Scholar

  • Bortoni-Ricardo, Stella Maris. 1985. The urbanization of rural dialect speakers: A sociolinguistic study of Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Boyd-Bowman, Peter. 1960. El habla de Guanajuato. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar

  • Britain, David. 2013. Space, diffusion and mobility. In J. K. Chambers & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 2nd edn, 471–500. Malden, MA & Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Brown, Esther L. 2005. New Mexican Spanish: Insight into the variable reduction of ‘la ehe inihial’ (/s-/). Hispania 88(4). 813–824.Google Scholar

  • Brown, Esther L. & William D. Raymond. 2012. How discourse context shapes the lexicon: Explaining the distribution of Spanish f-/h words. Diachronica 29(2). 139–161.Google Scholar

  • Brown, Esther L. & Rena Torres Cacoullos. 2003. Spanish /s/: A different story from beginning (initial) to end (final). In Rafael Núñez-Cedeño, Luis López & Richard Cameron (eds.), A Romance perspective in language knowledge and use. Selected papers from the 31st Linguistic Symposium of Romance Languages (LSRL), 22–38. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Bybee, Joan. 2002. Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14. 261–290.Google Scholar

  • Cashman, Holly R. 2003. Red social y bilingüismo (inglés/español) en Detroit, Michigan. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana 3. 59–78.Google Scholar

  • Cepeda, Gladys. 1995. Retention and deletion of word-final /s/ in Valdivian Spanish (Chile). Hispanic Linguistics 6(7). 329–354.Google Scholar

  • Chambers, Jack K. 2003. Sociolinguistic theory: Linguistic variation and its social significance. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Evans, Betsy. 2004. The role of social network in the acquisition of local dialect norms by Appalachian migrants in Ypsilanti, Michigan. Language Variation and Change 16(2). 153–167.Google Scholar

  • Fairchild, Stephen T. & Nicole B. Simpson. 2004. Mexican migration to the United States Pacific Northwest. Population Research and Policy Review 23. 219–234.Google Scholar

  • File-Muriel, Richard J. & Earl K. Brown. 2011. The gradient nature of s-lenition in Caleño Spanish. Language Variation and Change 23(2). 223–243.Google Scholar

  • Fontanella de Weinberg, María Beatriz. 1973. Comportamiento ante -s de hablantes femeninos y masculinos del español bonaerense. Romance Philology 27. 50–58.Google Scholar

  • Foulkes, Paul. 1997. Historical laboratory phonology – Investigating /p/> /f/> /h/ changes. Language and Speech 40. 249–276.Google Scholar

  • Greenlee, Mel. 1992. Perception and production of voiceless Spanish fricatives by Chicano children and adults. Language and Speech 35(1–2). 173–187.Google Scholar

  • Gries, Stefan T. 2013. Statistics for linguistics with R: A practical introduction. Berlin, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Hualde, José Ignacio. 1991. Aspiration and resyllabification in Chinato Spanish. Probus 3(1). 55–76.Google Scholar

  • Instituto Nacional de Estadistica Geografia e Informatica (INEGI). 2006. Statistical yearbook of the state of Michoacán. Aguascalientes, Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía, e Informática.Google Scholar

  • Johnson, Daniel Ezra. 2009. Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed- effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1). 359–383.Google Scholar

  • Keating, Patricia A. 2006. Phonetic encoding of prosodic structure. In Jonathan Harrington & Marija Tabain (eds.) Speech production: Models, phonetic processes, and techniques, 167–186. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

  • Labov, William. 1990. The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change 2(2). 205–254.Google Scholar

  • Labov, William. 2001. Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Lippi-Green, Rosina L. 1989. Social network integration and language change in progress in a rural alpine village. Language in Society 18. 213–234.Google Scholar

  • Lipski, John. 1995. [round] and [labial] in Spanish and the “free-form” syllable. Linguistics 33. 283–304.Google Scholar

  • Lipski, John M. 2008. Varieties of Spanish in the United States. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

  • Matus-Mendoza, María de la Luz. 2004. Assibilation of /-r/ and migration among Mexicans. Language Variation and Change 16. 17–30.Google Scholar

  • Mazzaro, Natalia. 2005. Aspiration and velarization of /f/ in Argentine Spanish. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 25. 58–67.Google Scholar

  • Mazzaro, Natalia. 2011. Experimental approaches to sound variation: A Sociophonetic study of labial and velar fricatives and approximants in Argentine Spanish. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Mazzaro, Natalia. 2015. Explaining variation and change in Spanish peripheral fricatives. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 7(2). 299–326.Google Scholar

  • Menard, Scott. 2002. Applied logistic regression analysis, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Méndez Dosuna, Julián. 1996. Can weakening processes start in initial position? In Bernard Hurch & Richard Rhodes (eds.), Natural phonology: The state of the art, 97–106. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Menéndez Pidal, Ramón. 1964. Orígenes del español, 5th edn. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar

  • Milroy, Lesley. 1987. Language and social networks, 2nd edn. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Milroy, Lesley & James Milroy. 1992. Social network and social class: Toward an integrated sociolinguistic model. Language in Society 21. 1–26.Google Scholar

  • Naro, Anthony J. 1972. On ‘f> h’ in Castilian and Western Romance. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 88(4–6). 435–447.Google Scholar

  • Parodi, Claudia. 2001. Contacto de dialectos y lenguas en el Nuevo Mundo: La vernacularización del español en América. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 149. 33–53.Google Scholar

  • Parodi, Claudia. 2011. El otro México: Español chicano, koineización y diglosia en Los Ángeles, California. In Pedro Martín Butragueño (ed.), Realismo en el análisis de corpus orales: Primer Coloquio de Cambio y Variación Lingüística, 217–243. México, DF: El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Lingüísticos y Literarios.Google Scholar

  • Penny, Ralph J. 1972. The re-emergence of /f/ as a phoneme in Castilian. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 88(4–6). 463–482.Google Scholar

  • Penny, Ralph J. 1990. Labiodental /f/, aspiration and /h/-dropping in Spanish: The evolving phonemic values of the graphs f and h. In David Hook & Barry Tarlor (eds.), Cultures in contact in Medieval Spain: Historical and literary essays presented to L.P. Harvey, 157–182. London: King’s College.Google Scholar

  • Penny, Ralph J. 2000. Variation and change in Spanish. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Pensado, Carmen. 1993. Sobre el contexto del cambio f > h en Castellano. Romance Philology 47(2). 147–176.Google Scholar

  • Poplack, Shana. 1979. Function and process in a variable phonology. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Pozos Rodríguez, Alejandra & Araceli Simón Gómez. 2012. Some cultural references in audiovisual translation of Shrek 2. Xalapa, Mexico: Universidad Veracruzana thesis.Google Scholar

  • Quilis, Antonio. 1993. Tratado de fonética y fonología españolas. Madrid: Editorial Gredos.Google Scholar

  • Renaud, Jeffrey Bernard. 2014. An optimality theoretic typology of three fricative-vowel assimilations in Latin American Spanish. Iowa City, Iowa: The University of Iowa dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Shin, Naomi Lapidus & Jackelyn Van Buren. 2016. Maintenance of Spanish subject pronoun expression patterns among bilingual children of farmworkers in Washington/Montana. Spanish in Context 13(2). 173–194.Google Scholar

  • Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2005. Language users as creatures of habit: A corpus-based analysis of persistence in spoken English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1. 113–149.Google Scholar

  • Tagliamonte, Sali. 2011. Variationist sociolinguistics: Change, observation, and interpretation. Malden, MA & West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Terrell, Tracy D. 1981. Diachronic reconstruction by dialect comparison of variable constraints: S-aspiration and deletion in Spanish. In David Sankoff (ed.) Variation Omnibus, 115–124. Carbondale, IL: Linguistic research.Google Scholar

  • Torreblanca, Maximo. 1984. La “f” prerromana y la vasca en su relación con el español antiguo. Romance Philology 35. 447–463.Google Scholar

  • Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • U.S. Census Bureau. 2013. American FactFinder. http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk (accessed 26 March 2014).

  • U.S. Census Bureau. 2014. American FactFinder. http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk. (accessed 26 March 2014).

  • Villa, Daniel, Naomi Lapidus Shin & Eva Robles Nagata. 2014. La nueva frontera: Spanish-speaking populations in Central Washington. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 7(1). 149–172.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-05-02

Published in Print: 2017-05-01


Citation Information: Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 161–188, ISSN (Online) 2199-3386, ISSN (Print) 1939-0238, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2017-0005.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in