Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Scandinavian Journal of Pain

Official Journal of the Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain

Editor-in-Chief: Breivik, Harald

CiteScore 2018: 0.85

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.494
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.427

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 1, Issue 3


Brain activation due to postoperative pain from the right hand measured with regional cerebral blood flow using positron emission tomography

Torsten Gordh
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Uppsala, SE 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Bertil Vinnars / Håkan Fischer
  • Uppsala University Hospital and Department of Psychology, University of Uppsala, SE 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Hans Blomberg
  • Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Uppsala, SE 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Jan Modig
  • Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Uppsala, SE 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Mats Fredrikson
  • Uppsala University Hospital and Department of Psychology, University of Uppsala, SE 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Per Hartvig
Published Online: 2010-07-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2010.05.036



Brain activation resulting from acute postoperative pain has to our knowledge not previously been studied using positron emission tomography, except from one case study. The aim of this study was to monitor activation in brain sensory pathways during acute pain after surgery of the hand. A secondary aim was to compare brain activation in clinical postoperative pain to that previously reported, by the same research group, for a model of experimental pain from the same body area. Increase in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) is presumed to indicate neuronal activation and decrease in blood flow decreased neuronal firing. An increase in blood flow in a brain region may represent stimulatory activity as well as inhibitory.


Brain activity was measured during clinical postoperative pain and a pain free state in six patients with positron emission tomography (PET) as changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF). rCBF during pain from surgery of the right thumb base was compared with a pain free state achieved by regional anaesthesia of the painful area.


In postoperative pain, patients had a significantly higher CBF in the contralateral/primary and secondary somatosensory cortices as well as in the contralateral motor cortex compared to the pain free stat during local regional anaesthesia. Relatively lower rCBF during the pain state was observed in clusters in the contralateral tertiary sensory cortex, ipsilateral and contralateral secondary visual cortex, prelimbic cortex, ipsilateral prefrontal as well as anterior cingulate cortex and contralateral secondary somatosensory cortex. The increased rCBF in primary and somatosensory cortices probably correspond to pain localizing processing.

We also compared the findings in cerebral activation patterns of the postoperative pain state as described above, with the results from a previously published study by the same research group, using an experimental pain model when pain was inflicted with application of mustard oil in the same location, the thumb base region of the right hand. Since no formal statistical analysis was carried out between the two studies, the data are not very strong, but the differences reported were obvious when comparing the two situations.

The comparison gave the following outcome:

Digit activation occurred in identical sensory brain areas, i.e. primary and secondary somatosensory cortices, as compared to the changes in this study, supporting that pain localization processes use similar sensory pathways in a nociceptive acute experimental pain model, and in clinical acute postoperative nociceptive pain. Dissimilarities were observed between the models in activation of brain areas coding of the emotional pain qualities, indicating some differences between the experimental and “real” acute nociceptive pain.


We have reported a distinct cerebral activation pattern produced by acute postoperative pain following hand surgery. The findings were compared to data obtained in a previously published report of the cerebral activation pattern from an acute experimental pain model in volunteers. We found similarities as well as some differences in the activation pattern between the two situations.

Keywords: Brain imaging; Regional cerebral blood flow; Postoperative pain; Regional nerve block

DOI of refers to article: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2010.05.033.


  • [1]

    Andersson JL, Lilja A, Hartvig P, Långström B, Gordh Jr T, Handwerker H, Torebjörk E. Somatotopic organization along the central sulcus for pain localisation in humans as revealed by PET. Exp Brain Res 1997;117:192–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [2]

    Casey KL, Minoshima S, Berger KL, Koeppe RA, Morrow TJ, Frey KA. Positron emission tomographic analysis of cerebral structures activated specifically by repetitive noxious stimuli. J Neurophysiol 1994;71:802–7.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [3]

    Casey Kl, Morrow TJ, Lorenz J, Minoshima S. Temporal and spatial dynamics of human forebrain activity during heat pain: analysis by positron emission tomography. J Neurophysiol 2001;85:951–9.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [4]

    Coghill RC, Talbot JD, Evans AC, Meyer E, Gjedde A, Bushnell MC, Duncan GH. Distributed processing of pain and vibration by the human brain. J Neurosci 1994;14:4095–108.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5]

    Garcia-Larrea L, Peyron R, Mertens P, Gregoire MC, Lavenne F, Bonnefoi F, Mauguiere F, Laurent B, Sindou M. Positron emission tomography during motor cortex stimulation for pain control. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1997;68:141–8.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6]

    Jones AKP, Brown WD, Friston KJ, Qi LY, Frackowiak RSJ. Cortical and subcortical localization of response to pain using positron emission tomography. Proc R Soc Lond B 1991;244:39–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [7]

    Talbot JD, Marret S, Evans AC, Meyer E, Bushnell MC, Duncan GH. Multiple representations of pain in human cerebral cortex. Science 1991;251:1355–8.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [8]

    Xu X, Fukuyama H, Yazawa S, Mima T, Hanakawa T, Magata Y, Kanda M, Fujiwara N, Shindo K, Nagamine T, Shibasaki H. Functional localization of pain perception in the human brain studied by PET. Neuroreport 1997;8:555–9.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9]

    Hsieh JC, Ståhle-Bäckdahl M, Hägermark Ö, Stone-Elander S, Rosenquist G, Ingvar M. Traumatic nociceptive pain activates the hypothalamus and the periaqueductal gray: a positron emission tomography study. Pain 1995;64:303–14.Google Scholar

  • [10]

    Peyron R, Laurent B, Garcia-Larrea L. Functional imaging of brain response to pain—a review and meta-analysis. Neurophysiol Clin 2000;30(5):263–88.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [11]

    deLeeuw R, Albuquergue R, Okeson J, Carlson C. The contribution of neuroimaging techniques to the understanding of supraspinal pain circuits: implications of orofacial pain. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;100:308–14.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [12]

    Hsieh JC, Belfrage M, Stone-Elander S, Hansson P, Ingvar M. Central representation of chronic ongoing neuropathic studied by positron emission tomography. Pain 1995;63:225–36.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13]

    Kupers RC, Svensson P, Jensen TS. Central representation of muscle pain and mechanical hyperesthesia in the oro-facial region: a positron emission tomography study. Pain 2004;108:284–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [14]

    Kupers RC, Kehlet H. Brain imaging of clinical pain states: a critical review and strategies for further studies. Lancet Neurol 2006;5:1033–44.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [15]

    Holte S, Eriksson L, Dahlbom M. A preliminary evaluation of the Scanditronix PC 2048-15B brain scanner. Eur J Nucl Med 1989;15:719–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [16]

    Andersson JLR. How to estimate global flow independent of changes in local flow. NeuroImage 1997;6:237–44.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [17]

    Bergström M, Eriksson L, Bohm C, Blomqvist G, Litton J. Correction for scattered radiation in a ring detector positron camera by integral transformations of the projections. J Comp Assist Tomogr 1983;7:42–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [18]

    Greitz T, Bohm G, Holte S, Eriksson L. A computerized brain atlas: construction, anatomical content, and some applications. J Comp Assist Tomogr 1991;15:26–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [19]

    Andersson JLR, Thurfjell L. Implementation and validation of a fully autonomic system for intra- and interindividual registration of PET brain scans. J Comp Assist Tomogr 1997;21:136–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [20]

    Andersson JLR. A rapid and accurate method to realign PET scans utilizing image edge information. J Nucl Med 1995;36:657–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [21]

    Talairach J, Tournoux P. A co-planar stereotactic atlas of the human brain. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1988.Google Scholar

  • [22]

    Friston KJ, Frith CD, Liddle PF, Frackowiak RSJ. Comparing functional (PET) images: the assessment of significant change. J Cerebr Blood Flow Metab 1991;11:690–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23]

    Worsley KJ, Poline J-B, Vandal AC, Friston KJ. Tests for distributed nonfocal brain activations. NeuroImage 1995;2:183–94.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [24]

    Friston KJ, Worsley KJ, Frackowiak RSJ, Mazziotta JC, Evans AC. Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent. Hum Brain Map 1994;1:210–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [25]

    Friston KJ, Holmes A, Poline J-B, Price CJ, Frith CD. Detecting activations in PET and fMRI: levels of inference and power. NeuroImage 1996;40:223–35.Google Scholar

  • [26]

    Derbyshire SWG, Jones AKP, Devani P, Friston KJ, Feinmann C, Harris M, Pearce P, Watson JDG, Frackowiak RSJ. Cerebral responses to pain in patients with atypical facial pain measured by positron emission tomography. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:1166–72.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [27]

    Hsieh JC, Hannerz J, Ingvar M. Right lateralised central processing for pain of nitroglycerin-induced cluster headache. Pain 1996;67:59–68.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [28]

    Hsieh JC, Meyerson BA, Ingvar M. PET study on central processing of pain in trigeminal neuropathy. Eur J Pain 1999;3(1):51–65.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [29]

    Iadarola MJ, Max MB, Berman KF, Byas-Smith MG, Coghill RC, Gracely RH, Bennet GJ. Unilateral decrease in thalamic activity observed with positron emission tomography in patients with chronic neuropathic pain. Pain 1995;63:55–64.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [30]

    Buvanendran A, Ali A, Stoub TR, Berger RA, Kroin JS. The use of brain positron emission tomography to identify sites of postoperative pain processing with and without epidural analgesia. Anesth Analg 2007;105:1784–6.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [31]

    Fredrikson M, Ericson K, Eriksson L, Stone-Elander, Greitz T. A functional cerebral glucose response frightening visual stimuli. Psychiatry Res 1993;50:15–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [32]

    Fredrikson M, Wik G, Greitz T, Eriksson L, Stone-Elander S, Ericson K, Sedvall G. Regional cerebral blood flow during experimental phobic fear. Psychophysiology 1993;30:126–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [33]

    Fredrikson M, Wik G, Annas P, Ericson K, Stone-Elander S. Functional neuroanatomy of visually elicited simple phobic fear: additional data and theoretical analysis. Psychophysiology 1995;32:43–8.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [34]

    Rainville P, Duncan GH, Price DD, Carrier B, Bushnell. Pain affect encoded in human anterior cingulate but not in somatosensory cortex. Science 1997;277:968–71.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Uppsala University Hospital, SE 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden. Tel.: +46 18 611 4876; fax: +46 18 514 621 E-mail: torsten.gordh@surgsci.uu.se

Received: 2009-11-04

Revised: 2010-05-26

Accepted: 2010-05-26

Published Online: 2010-07-01

Published in Print: 2010-07-01

Conflicts of interest: None declared.

Citation Information: Scandinavian Journal of Pain, Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages 115–119, ISSN (Online) 1877-8879, ISSN (Print) 1877-8860, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2010.05.036.

Export Citation

© 2010 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in