Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Scandinavian Journal of Pain

Official Journal of the Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain

Editor-in-Chief: Breivik, Harald


CiteScore 2018: 0.85

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.494
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.427

Online
ISSN
1877-8879
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 15, Issue 1

Issues

Relationship of musculoskeletal pain and well-being at work – Does pain matter?

Kirsi Malmberg-Ceder
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Neurology, Satakunta Central Hospital, Pori, Finland
  • Department of Neurology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Maija Haanpää
  • Mutual Insurance Company Etera, Helsinki, Finland
  • Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Päivi E. Korhonen
  • Department of General Practice, Turku University and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Hannu Kautiainen
  • Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  • Unit of Primary Health Care, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
  • Folkhälsan Research Centre, Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Seppo Soinila
  • Department of Neurology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
  • Division of Clinical Neurosciences/General Neurology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-04-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.11.018

Abstract

Background and aims

Musculoskeletal pain is a common symptom and many people even with chronic pain continue to work. The aim of our study is to analyze how musculoskeletal pain affects work wellbeing by comparing work engagement in employees with or without pain, and how pain-related risk of disability is associated with work engagement. In a separate analysis, we also studied, how psychosocial factors are related to work engagement.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study of Finnish female employees of the city of Pori, Finland (PORi To Aid Against Threats (PORTAAT) study). Data was collected by trained study nurses and self-administrated questionnaires. Work well-being was measured by work engagement using Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9) questionnaire and the burden of pain was measured by using the short version of Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (ÖMPSQ). Study population was divided into four groups: those without pain and the groups with low (I), medium (II) or high (III) ÖMPSQ score, reflecting increasing risk of long term disability due to musculoskeletal pain. The study nurse assessed psychosocial risk factors using defined core questions.

Results

We evaluated 702 female employees, 601 (86%) had suffered from musculoskeletal pain over the past 12 months, whereas 101 (14%) reported no pain at all. Pain was chronic (duration at least 3 months) in 465/601 (77%) subjects. Subjects with musculoskeletal pain were older, had higher BMI and were on sick leave more often than subjects without pain. Of the psychosocial risk factors, depression, type D personality, anxiety and hostility were significantly more common among subjects with musculoskeletal pain. Hypertension and the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were significantly more frequent in the musculoskeletal pain group. Quality of sleep and working capability were significantly better among persons without pain. Average weekly working hours were slightly higher among those with musculoskeletal pain.

In crude analysis, work engagement (UWES-9) was similar in women without pain and those with musculoskeletal pain (4.96 vs. 4.79; p = 0.091). After adjustment for age, education years, BMI, working hours and financial satisfaction, the difference between the groups became statistically significant (p = 0.036). Still, there was no difference between the groups of no-pain and low burden of pain (p = 0.21, after adjustment). Work engagement was significantly lower in the groups of medium (p = 0.024, after adjusted) and high (p < 0.001, after adjustment) burden of pain. Linearity across the Linton tertiles was significant (p < 0.001). In univariate and multivariate ordered logistic regression analyses relating study variables to the work engagement musculoskeletal pain per se did not enter in the model to explain work engagement. Work and family stress, type D personality and duration of sick leave due to pain reduced work engagement, whereas financial satisfaction, moderate and high leisure time physical activity and higher BMI improved it.

Conclusions

Among women with musculoskeletal pain psychosocial and lifestyle factors significantly correlate with work engagement, while the pain itself does not.

Implications

Special attention should be paid to the psychosocial aspects in female employees with musculoskeletal pain to improve work well-being and maintain work ability.

Keywords: Musculoskeletal pain; Work engagement; Work well-being; UWES (Utrecht Work Engagement Scale); ÖMPSQ (Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire)

References

About the article

Department of Neurology, Satakunta Central Hospital, Sairaalantie, 28500 Pori, Satakunta, Finland.


Received: 2016-08-29

Revised: 2016-11-22

Accepted: 2016-11-26

Published Online: 2017-04-01

Published in Print: 2017-04-01


Ethical issues: The study protocol and consent forms were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital District of Southwestern Finland. All participants provided written informed consent for the project and subsequent medical research.

Conflict of interest: The authors have no competing interests to declare.


Citation Information: Scandinavian Journal of Pain, Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 38–43, ISSN (Online) 1877-8879, ISSN (Print) 1877-8860, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.11.018.

Export Citation

© 2016 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in