Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …
New at De Gruyter

Scandinavian Journal of Pain

Official Journal of the Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain

Editor-in-Chief: Breivik, Harald

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2017: 0.84

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.401
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.452

Online
ISSN
1877-8879
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 17, Issue 1

COMBAT study – Computer based assessment and treatment – A clinical trial evaluating impact of a computerized clinical decision support tool on pain in cancer patients

Sunil X. Raj
  • Corresponding author
  • European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
  • Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Cinzia Brunelli
  • Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Pål Klepstad
  • Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
  • Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Stein Kaasa
  • European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
  • Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-10-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.07.016

Abstract

Background and aims

The prevalence of pain in cancer patients are relatively high and indicate inadequate pain management strategies. Therefore, it is necessary to develop new methods and to improve implementation of guidelines to assess and treat pain. The vast improvement in information technology facilitated development of a computerized symptom assessment and decision support system (CCDS) - the Combat system - which was implemented in an outpatient cancer clinic to evaluate improvement in pain management.

Methods

We conducted a controlled before-and-after study between patient cohorts in two consecutive study periods: before (n = 80) and after (n = 134) implementation of the Combat system. Patients in the first cohort completed questionnaires with the paper-and-pencil method and this data was not shown to physicians. Patients in the latter cohort completed an electronic questionnaire by using an iPad and the data were automatically transferred and presented to physicians at point of care. Additionally, the system provided computerized decision support at point of care for the physician based on the electronic questionnaires completed by the patients, an electronic CRF completed by physicians and clinical guidelines.

Results

The Combat system did not improve pain intensity and there were no significant alterations in the prescribed dose of opiates compared to the cohort of patients managed without the Combat system.

Conclusion

The Combat system did not improve pain management. This may be explained by several factors, however, we consider lack of proper implementation of the CCDS in the clinic to be the most important factor. As a result, we did not manage to change the behaviour of the physicians in the clinic.

Implications

There is a need to conduct larger prospective studies to evaluate the efficacy of modern information technology to improve pain management in cancer patients. Before introducing new information technology in the clinics, it is important to have a well thought out implementation strategy. The trial is registered at Clinialtrials.gov, number NCT01795157.

Keywords: CCDS; Computer; Pain; Decision support; Cancer outpatients

References

  • [1]

    Kwon JH. Overcoming barriers in cancer pain management. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:1727–33.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [2]

    Fisch MJ, Lee JW, Weiss M, Wagner LI, Chang VT, Cella D, Manola JB, Minasian LM, McCaskill-Stevens W, Mendoza TR, Cleeland CS. Prospective, observational study of pain and analgesic prescribing in medical oncology outpatients with breast, colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:1980–8.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [3]

    Porta-Sales J, Nabal-Vicuna M, Vallano A, Espinosa J, Planas-Domingo J, Verger-Fransoy E, Julia-Torras J, Serna J, Pascual-Lopez A, Rodriguez D, Grimau I, Morlans G, Sala-Rovira C, Calsina-Berna A, Borras-Andres JM, Gomez-Batiste X. Have we improved pain control in cancer patients? A multicenter study of ambulatory and hospitalized cancer patients. J Palliat Med 2015.Web of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [4]

    Cohen MZ, Easley MK, Ellis C, Hughes B, Ownby K, Rashad BG, Rude M, Taft E, Westbrooks JB. Cancer pain management and the JCAHO’s pain standards. J Pain Symptom Manag 2003;25:519–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5]

    Gravis G, Marino P, Joly F, Oudard S, Priou F, Esterni B, Latorzeff I, Delva R, Krakowski I, Laguerre B, Rolland F, Theodore C, Deplanque G, Ferrero JM, Pouessel D, Mourey L, Beuzeboc P, Zanetta S, Habibian M, Berdah JF, Dauba J, Baciuchka M, Platini C, Linassier C, Labourey JL, Machiels JP, El Kouri C, Ravaud A, Suc E, Eymard JC, Hasbini A, Bousquet G, Soulie M, Fizazi K. Patients’ selfassessment versus investigators’ evaluation in a phase III trial in non-castrate metastatic prostate cancer (GETUG-AFU 15). Eur J Cancer 2014.Google Scholar

  • [6]

    Di Maio M, Gallo C, Leighl NB, Piccirillo MC, Daniele G, Nuzzo F, Gridelli C, Gebbia V, Ciardiello F, De Placido S, Ceribelli A, Favaretto AG, de Matteis A, Feld R, Butts C, Bryce J, Signoriello S, Morabito A, Rocco G, Perrone F. Symptomatic toxicities experienced during anticancer treatment: agreement between patient and physician reporting in three randomized trials. J ClinOncol 2015;33:910–5.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [7]

    Cleeland CS, Gonin R, Hatfield AK, Edmonson JH, Blum RH, Stewart JA, Pandya KJ. Pain and its treatment in outpatients with metastatic cancer. N Engl J Med 1994;330:592–6.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [8]

    Kaasa S, Apolone G, Klepstad P, Loge JH, Hjermstad MJ, Corli O, Strasser F, Heiskanen T, Costantini M, Zagonel V, Groenvold M, Fainsinger R, Jensen MP, Farrar JT, McQuay H, Rothrock NE, Cleary J, Deguines C, Caraceni A. Expert conference on cancer pain assessment and classification - the need for international consensus: working proposals on international standards. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2011.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [9]

    Zech DF, Grond S, Lynch J, Hertel D, Lehmann KA. Validation of World Health Organization Guidelines for cancer pain relief: a 10-year prospective study. Pain 1995;63:65–76.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [10]

    Du Pen SL, Du Pen AR, Polissar N, Hansberry J, Kraybill BM, Stillman M, Panke J, Everly R, Syrjala K. Implementing guidelines for cancer pain management: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:361–70.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11]

    Cleeland CS, Gonin R, Baez L, Loehrer P, Pandya KJ. Pain and treatment of pain in minority patients with cancer. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Minority Outpatient Pain Study.Ann Intern Med 1997;127:813–6.Google Scholar

  • [12]

    Sucher JF, Moore FA, Todd SR, Sailors RM, McKinley BA. Computerized clinical decision support: a technology to implement and validate evidence based guidelines. J Trauma 2008;64:520–37.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [13]

    Cleeland CS, Wang XS, Shi Q, Mendoza TR, Wright SL, Berry MD, Malveaux D, Shah PK, Gning I, Hofstetter WL, Putnam JBJ, Vaporciyan AA. Automated symptom alerts reduce postoperative symptom severity after cancer surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:994–1000.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [14]

    van Wyk JT, van Wijk MA, Sturkenboom MC, Mosseveld M, Moorman PW, van der Lei J. Electronic alerts versus on-demand decision support to improve dyslipidemia treatment: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Circulation 2008;117:371–8.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [15]

    Terrell KM, Perkins AJ, Hui SL, Callahan CM, Dexter PR, Miller DK. Computerized decision support for medication dosing in renal insufficiency: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 2010;56:623–9.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [16]

    Bertsche T, Askoxylakis V, Habl G, Laidig F, Kaltschmidt J, Schmitt SP, Ghaderi H, Bois AZ, Milker-Zabel S, Debus J, Bardenheuer HJ, Haefeli WE. Multidisciplinary pain management based on a computerized clinical decision support system in cancer pain patients. Pain 2009;147:20–8.Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [17]

    Holbrook A, Thabane L, Keshavjee K, Dolovich L, Bernstein B, Chan D, Troyan S, Foster G, Gerstein H. Individualized electronic decision support and reminders to improve diabetes care in the community: COMPETE II randomized trial. CMAJ 2009;181:37–44.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [18]

    McCowan C, Neville RG, Ricketts IW, Warner FC, Hoskins G, Thomas GE. Lessons from a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate computer decision support software to improve the management ofasthma. Med Inform Internet Med 2001;26:191–201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [19]

    Schmidt-Kraepelin C, Janssen B, Gaebel W. Prevention of rehospitalization in schizophrenia: results ofan integrated care project in Germany. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2009;259 (Suppl 2):S205–12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [20]

    Roshanov PS, Fernandes N, Wilczynski JM, Hemens BJ, You JJ, Handler SM, Nieuwlaat R, Souza NM, Beyene J, Van Spall HG, Garg AX, Haynes RB. Features of effective computerised clinical decision support systems: meta-regression of 162 randomised trials. BMJ 2013;346:f657.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [21]

    Takeuchi EE, Keding A, Awad N, Hofmann U, Campbell LJ, Selby PJ, Brown JM, Velikova G. Impact of patient-reported outcomes in oncology: a longitudinal analysis of patient-physician communication. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:2910–7.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [22]

    Velikova G, Booth L, Smith AB, Brown PM, Lynch P, Brown JM, Selby PJ. Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controll edtrial. J Clinöncol 2004;22:714–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23]

    A. Apple iPad2; 2015. Retrieved from https://www.apple.com/ipad/[last accessed 08.06.15].

  • [24]

    Rayner L, Price A, Hotopf M, Higginson IJ. The development of evidence-based European guide lines on the management of depression in palliative cancercare. Eur J Cancer 2011;47:702–12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [25]

    Caraceni A, Hanks G, Kaasa S, Bennett MI, Brunelli C, Cherny N, Dale O, De Conno F, Fallon M, Hanna M, Haugen DF, Juhl G, King S, Klepstad P, Laugsand EA, Maltoni M, Mercadante S, Nabal M, Pigni A, Radbruch L, Reid C, Sjogren P, Stone PC, Tassinari D, Zeppetell G. Use of opioid analgesics in the treatment of cancer pain: evidence-based recommendations from the EAPC. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:e58–68.Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [26]

    Daut RL, Cleeland CS, Flanery RC. Development of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases. Pain 1983;17:197–210.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [27]

    Klepstad P, Loge JH, Borchgrevink PC, Mendoza TR, Cleeland CS, Kaasa S. The Norwegian brief pain inventory questionnaire: translation and validation in cancerpain patients. J Pain Symptom Manag 2002;24:517–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [28]

    Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, Beaton D, Cleeland CS, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Kerns RD, Ader DN, Brandenburg N, Burke LB, Cella D, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dimitrova R, Dionne R, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Katz NP, Kehlet H, Kramer LD, Manning DC, McCormick C, McDermott MP, McQuay HJ, Patel S, Porter L, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Rauschkolb C, Revicki DA, Rothman M, Schmader KE, Stacey BR, Stauffer JW, von Stein T, White RE, Witter J, Zavisic S. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinicaltrials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain 2008;9:105–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [29]

    Raj SX, Thronaes M, Brunelli C, Hjermstad MJ, Klepstad P, Kaasa S. A crosssectional study on prevalence of pain and breakthrough pain among an unselected group of outpatients in a tertiary cancerclinic. Support Care Cancer 2014;22:1965–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [30]

    Frison L, Pocock SJ. Repeated measures in clinical trials: analysis using mean summary statistics and its implications for design Stat Med 1992;11:1685–704.Google Scholar

  • [31]

    Hanks G, Cherny N, Christakis NA, Fallon M, Kaasa S, Portenoy RK. Oxford textbook of palliative medicine. Oxford University Press; 2009.Google Scholar

  • [32]

    Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review oftrials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005;330:765.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [33]

    Blum D, Raj SX, Oberholzer R, Riphagen II, Strasser F, Kaasa S, EURO IMPACT, E.I.M.P.C.R.T. Computer-based clinical decision support systems and patientreported outcomes: a systematic review. Patient 2015;8:397–409.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [34]

    Cresswell KM, Bates DW, Sheikh A. Ten key considerations for the successful implementation and adoption of large-scale health information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20:e9–13.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [35]

    Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young JM, Odgaard-Jensen J, French SD, O’Brien MA, Johansen M, Grimshaw J, Oxman AD. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;6:CD000259.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [36]

    Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet 2003;362:1225–30.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [37]

    Colquhoun HL, Squires JE, Kolehmainen N, Fraser C, Grimshaw JM. Methods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals’ behaviour: a systematic review. Implement Sci 2017;12:30.Web of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [38]

    Miriovsky BJ, Shulman LN, Abernethy AP. Importance of health information technology, electronic health records, and continuously aggregating data to comparative effectiveness research and learning health care. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:4243–8.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [39]

    Moja L, Passardi A, Capobussi M, Banzi R, Ruggiero F, Kwag K, Liberati EG, Mangia M, Kunnamo I, Cinquini M, Vespignani R, Colamartini A, Di Iorio V, Massa I, González-Lorenzo M, Bertizzolo L, Nyberg P, Grimshaw J, Bonovas S, Nanni O. Implementing an evidence-based computerized decision support system linked to electronic health records to improve care for cancer patients: the ONCO-CODES study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci 2016;11:153.Web of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [40]

    Williams JE, Yen JT, Parker G, Chapman S, Kandikattu S, Barbachano Y. Prevalence of pain in head and neck cancer out-patients. J Laryngol Otol 2010;124:767–73.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [41]

    Valeberg BT, Miaskowski C, Hanestad BR, Bjordal K, Paul S, Rusøoen T. Demographic, clinical, and pain characteristics are associated with average pain severity groups in a sample of oncology outpatients. J Pain 2008;9:873–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, St. Olavs University Hospital, NO-7006 Trondheim, Norway


Received: 2017-05-13

Revised: 2017-06-12

Accepted: 2017-07-07

Published Online: 2017-10-01

Published in Print: 2017-10-01


Ethical issues The study was approved by the Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics in Norway and all patients provided written informed consent to participate in the study before inclusion.

Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. Cinzia Brunelli has provided consultancy for Mundipharma Pharmaceurticals. The main author has full control of all primary data and will allow the journal to review the data if requested.


Citation Information: Scandinavian Journal of Pain, Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 99–106, ISSN (Online) 1877-8879, ISSN (Print) 1877-8860, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.07.016.

Export Citation

© 2017 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in