Nordin M, Carragee EJ, Hogg-Johnson S, Schecter Weiner S, Hurwitz EL, Peloso PM, Guzman J, van der Velde G, Carroll LJ, Holm LW, Côté P, Cassidy JD, Haldeman S. Assessment of neck pain and its associated disorders. Results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and its associated disorders. Spine 2008;33:101–22.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rydevik B, Brodda Jansen G, Edlund C, Grane P, Hildingsson C, Karlberg M, Link H, Måwe U, Portala K, Sterner Y. Diagnosis and early management of whiplash injuries. Stockholm, Sweden: The Swedish society of medicine and the Whiplash Commission Medical Task Force, 2006.Google Scholar
Angst F, Gantenbein AR, Lehmann S, Gysi-Klaus F, Aeschlimann A, Michel BA, Hegemann F. Multidimensional associative factors for improvement in pain, function, and working capacity after rehabilitation of whiplash associated disorder: a prognostic, prospective outcome study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:130.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Styrke J, Sojka P, Björnstig U, Stålnacke B-M. Symptoms, disabilities, and life satisfaction 5 years after whiplash injuries. Scand J Pain 2014;5:229–36.Google Scholar
Nyström B. Open mechanical provocation under local anesthesia: a definitive method for locating the focus in painful mechanical disorder of the motion segment. Fifth international conference on lumbar fusion and stabilization. Osaka Japan 1991. p. 198.Google Scholar
Nyström B. Segmental lumbar pain. Upsala J Med Sci 1993;Suppl. 52:67.Google Scholar
Nyström B, Weber H, Schillberg B, Taube A. Symptoms and signs possibly indicating segmental, discogenic pain. A fusion study with 18 years of follow-up. Scand J Pain 2017;16:213–20.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Nyström B, Svensson E, Larsson S, Schillberg B, Mörk A, Taube A. A small group Whiplash-Associated-Disorders (WAD) patients with central neck pain and movement induced stabbing pain, the painful segment determined by mechanical provocation: fusion surgery was superior to multimodal rehabilitation in a randomized trial. Scand J Pain 2016;12:33–42.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Hägg O, Fritzell P, Odén A, Nordwall A. Simplifying outcome measurement. Evaluation of instruments for measuring outcome after fusion surgery for chronic low back pain. Spine 2002;27:1213–22.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carragee EJ, Hurwitz EL, Cheng I, Carroll LJ, Nordin M, Guzman J, Peloso P, Holm LW, Côté P, Hogg-Johnson S, van der Velde G, Cassidy JD, Haldeman S. Treatment of neck pain. Injections and surgical interventions: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and its associated disorders. Spine 2008;33:S153–69.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar
Svensson E. Analysis of systematic and random differences between paired ordinal categorical data. Thesis, Göteborg University, Göteborg, 1993.Google Scholar
Svensson E, Schillberg B, Kling AM, Nyström B. Reliability of the Balanced Inventory for Spinal Disorders, a questionnaire for evaluation of outcomes in patients with various spinal disorders. J Spinal Disord Tech 2012;25:196–204.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar
Svensson E, Schillberg B, Kling AM, Nyström B. The Balanced Inventory for Spinal Disorders. The validity of a disease specific questionnaire for evaluation of outcomes in patients with various spinal disorders. Spine 2009;34:1976–83.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Svensson E, Schillberg B, Zhao X, Nyström B. Responsiveness of the balanced inventory for spinal disorders, a questionnaire for evaluation of outcomes in patients with various spinal disorders. J Spine Neurosurg 2015;4:2.Google Scholar
ICF Checklist; 2003. www.who.int/classifications/icfchecklist.pdf.
Bjorner JB, Kristensen TS, Orth-Gomér K, Tibblin G, Sullivan M, Westerholm P. Self-rated health a useful concept in research, prevention and clinical medicine. Swedish council for planning and coordination of research. Report 1996:9.Google Scholar
Siegel S, Castellan NJ. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 1988.Google Scholar
Dybkaer R, Jorgensen K. Measurement, value and scale. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1989;49(suppl 194):69–76.Google Scholar
Agresti A. Categorical data analysis. New York: John Wiley and sons, USA, 1990.Google Scholar
Hand DJ. Statistics and the theory of measurement. J R Statist Soc 1996;A159:445–92.Google Scholar
McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring health. A guide to rating scales and questionnaires, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996:359–61.Google Scholar
Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall, 1991.Google Scholar
Newcombe RG, Altman DG. Proportions and their differences. In: Altman DG, Machin D, Bryant TN, Gardner MJ, editors. Statistics with Confidence. 2nd ed. Bristol: BMJ Books, 2000:45–56.Google Scholar
Svensson E, Starmark J-E, Ekholm S, von Essen C, Johansson A. Analysis of inter-observer disagreement in the assessment of subarachnoid blood and acute hydrocephalus on CT scans. Neurol Res 1996;18:487–94.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ledenius K, Svensson E, Stålhammar F, Wiklund L-M, Thilander-Klang A. A method to analyse observer disagreement in visual grading studies: example of assessed image quality in paediatric cerebral multidetector CT images. Br J Radiol 2010;83:604–11.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Svensson E. Recent developments in analysis of paired ordinal data. Discussion of the paper Ivy Liu and Alan Agresti: the analysis of ordered categorical data: an overview and a survey of recent development. TEST 2005;14:1–73, 44–6.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Svensson E. Agreement. In: Everitt BS, Palmer CR, editors. Encyclopaedic Companion to Medical Statistics. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2010:10–2.Google Scholar
Avdic A, Svensson E. Svensson’s method 1.1 ed. Örebro 2010 Interactive software supporting Svensson’s method. Available at: http://avdic.se/svenssonsmetod.html. Accessed: 14 Aug 2015.
Clement RC, Welander A, Stowell C, Cha TD, Chen JL, Davies M, Fairbank JC, Foley KT, Gehrchen M, Hägg O, Jacobs WC, Kahler R, Khan SN, Lieberman IH, Morisson B, Ohnmeiss DD, Peul WC, Shonnard NH, Smuck MW, Solberg TK, et al. A proposed set of metrics for standardized outcome reporting in the management of low back pain. Acta Orthop 2015;86:523–33.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Mannion AF, Brox J-I, Fairbank JC. Consensus at last! Long-term results of all randomized controlled trials show that fusion is no better than non-operative care in improving pain and disability in chronic low back pain. Spine J 2016;16:588–90.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
About the article
Published Online: 2018-02-22
Published in Print: 2018-04-25
Research funding: We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation, the Axel and Margaret Ax:son Johnson Foundation, Volvo and Vägverket.
Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent: All patients were given both oral and written information on all parts of the study and gave their written informed consent.
Ethical approval: The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee, Örebro, Sweden, no. 368/96. The study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (registration no. NCT01994044).
Citation Information: Scandinavian Journal of Pain, Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 175–186, ISSN (Online) 1877-8879, ISSN (Print) 1877-8860, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2017-0180.