Leboeuf-Yde C, Nielsen J, Kyvik KO, Fejer R, Hartvigsen J. Pain in the lumbar, thoracic or cervical regions: do age and gender matter? A population-based study of 34,902 Danish twins 20–71 years of age. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009;10:39.Google Scholar
Manchikanti L, Boswell MV, Singh V, Pampati V, Damron KS, Beyer CD. Prevalence of facet joint pain in chronic spinal pain of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2004;5:15.Google Scholar
van Kleef M, Stolker RJ, Lataster A, Geurts J, Benzon HT, Mekhail N. Thoracic pain. Pain Pract 2010;10:327–38.Google Scholar
Dreyfuss P, Tibiletti C, Dreyer SJ. Thoracic zygapophyseal joint pain patterns. A study in normal volunteers. Spine 1994;19:807–11.Google Scholar
Fukui S, Ohseto K, Shiotani M. Patterns of pain induced by distending the thoracic zygapophy seal joints. Reg Anesth 1997;22:332–6.Google Scholar
Boswell MV, Colson JD, Sehgal N, Dunbar EE, Epter R. A systematic review of therapeutic facet joint interventions in chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician 2007;10:229–53.Google Scholar
Van Zundert J, Vanelderen P, Kessels A, Van Kleef M. Radiofrequency treatment of facet-related pain: evidence and controversies. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2012;16:19–25.Google Scholar
Manchikanti KN, Atluri S, Singh V, Geffert S, Sehgal N, Falco FJ. An update of evaluation of therapeutic thoracic facet joint interventions. Pain Physician 2012;15:E463–81.Google Scholar
Cosman ER Jr, Gonzalez CD. Bipolar 120 radiofrequency lesion geometry: implications for palisade treatment of sacroiliac joint pain. Pain Pract 2011;11:3–22.Google Scholar
Bruners P, Lipka J, Günther RW, Schmitz-Rode T, Mahnken AH. Bipolar radiofrequency ablation: is the shape of the coagulation volume different in comparison to monopolar RF ablation using variable active tip lengths? Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2008;17:267–74.Google Scholar
Ferrante FM, King LF, Roche EA, Kim PS, Aranda M, DeLaney LR, Mardini IA, Mannes AJ. Radiofrequency sacroiliac joint denervation for sacroiliac syndrome. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2001;26:137–42.Google Scholar
Pino CA, Hoeft MA, Hofsess C, Rathmell JP. Morphologic analysis of bipolar radiofrequency lesions: implications for treatment of the sacroiliac joint. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2005;30:335–8.Google Scholar
Kapural L, Vrooman B, Sarwar S, Krizanac-Bengez L, Rauck R, Gilmore C, North J, Girgis G, Mekhail N. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of transdiscal radiofrequency, biacuplasty for treatment of discogenic lower back pain. Pain Med 2013;14:362–73.Google Scholar
Zeng ZH, Yan M, Dai Y, Qiu WD, Deng S, Gu XZ. Percutaneous bipolar radiofrequency thermocoagulation for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. J Clin Neurosci 2016;30:39–43.Google Scholar
Kang SS, Shin KM, Jung SM, Park JH, Hong SJ. Sequential bipolar radiofrequency lumbar sympathectomy in Raynaud’s disease: a case report. Korean J Anesthesiol 2010;59:286–9.Google Scholar
Destegul D, Isik G, Özbek H, Ünlugenc H, Ilginel M. Radiofrequency thermocoagulation forthe treatment of lower extremity ischemic pain: comparison of monopolar and bipolar modes. Agri 2017;29:64–70.Google Scholar
Bogduk N, editor. Practice Guidelines for Spinal Diagnostic and Treatment Procedures. Chapters Lumbar medial branch blocks and Cervical medial branch blocks, 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: International Spine Intervention Society, 2013: 137 and 597.Google Scholar
van Eerd M, Patijn J, Lataster A, Rosenquist RW, van Kleef M, Mekhail N, Van Zundert J. Cervical facet pain. Pain Pract 2010;10:113–23.Google Scholar
Van Kleef M, Vanelderen P, Cohen SP, Lataster A, Van Zundert J, Mekhail N. Pain originating from the lumbar facet joints. Pain Pract 2010;10:459–69.Google Scholar
Gronblad M, Hupli M, Wennerstrand P, Jarvinen E, Lukinmaa A, Kouri JP, Karaharju EO. Intercorrelation and test-retest reliability of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (IDQ) and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients. Clin J Pain 1993;9:189–95.Google Scholar
Boswell MV, Colson JD, Sehgal N, Dunbar EE, Epter R. A systematic review oftherapeutic facet joint interventions in chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician 2007;10:229–53.Google Scholar
Manchikanti L, Kaye AD, Boswell MV, Bakshi S, Gharibo CG, Gramm V, Grider JS, Gupta S, Jha SS, Mann DP, Nampiaparampil DE, Sharma ML, Shroyer LN, Singh V, Soin A, Vellejo R, Wargo BW, Hirsch JA. A systematic review of efficacy and best evidencesynthesis of therapeutic facet joint interventions in managing chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician 2015; 18:E535–82.Google Scholar
Manchikanti L, Singh V, Falco FJE, Cash KA, Pampati V, Fellow B. The role of thoracic medial branch blocks in managing chronic mid and upper back pain: a randomized, double-blind, active-control trial with a 2-year followup. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2012;2012:585806.Google Scholar
Manchikanti L, Singh V, Falco FJE, Cash KA, Pampati V, Fellows B. Comparative effectiveness of a one-year follow-up of thoracic medial branch blocks in management of chronic thoracic pain: a randomized, double-blind active controlled trial. Pain Physician 2010;13:535–48.Google Scholar
Stolker RJ, Vervest ACM, Groen GJ. Percutaneous facet denervation in chronic thoracic spinal pain. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1993;122:82–90.Google Scholar
Tzaan WC, Tasker RR. Percutaneous radiofrequency facet rhozotomy – experience with 118 procedures and reappraisal of its value. Can J Neurol Sci 2000;27:125–30.Google Scholar
Speldewinde GC. Outcomes of percutaneous zygapophysial and sacroiliac joint neurotomy in a community setting. Pain Med 2011;12:209–18.Google Scholar
Mekhail N, Cheng J. Temperature mapping of cooled radio-frequency lesion of human cadaver thoracic facet medial branches. Clin J Pain 2011;27:56–61.Google Scholar
Walega D, Roussis C. Third-degree burn from cooled radiofrequency ablation of medial branch nerves for treatment of thoracic facet syndrome. Pain Pract 2014;14:154–8.Google Scholar
Chua WH, Bogduk N. The surgical anatomy of thoracic facet denervation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1995;136:140–4.Google Scholar
Panjabi MM, Takata K, Goel V, Federico D, Oxland T, Duranceau J, Krag M. Thoracic humanvertebrae–quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine 1991;16:888–901.Google Scholar
Tan SH, Teo EC, Chua HC. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of cervical, thoracic and lumbar vertebrae of Chinese Singaporens. Eur Spine J 2004;13:134–46.Google Scholar
Cosman ER Jr, Dolensky JR, Hoffman RA. Factors that affect radiofrequency heat lesion size. Pain Med 2014;15:2020–36.Google Scholar
Chou R, Atlas SJ, Stanos SP, Rosenquist RW. Nonsurgical interventional therapies for low back pain. Spine 2009;34:1078–93.Google Scholar
Soloman M, Mekhail MN, Mekhail N. Radiofrequency treatment in chronic pain. Expert Rev Neurother 2010;10:469–74.Google Scholar
Roca G, de Andres Ares J, Gay M, Nieto C, Bovaira MT. Radiofrequency complications and troubleshooting. Tech Reg Anesth Pain Manag 2014;18:25–34.Google Scholar
Kim D. Bipolar intra-articular radiofrequency thermocoagulation of the thoracic facet joints: a case series of a new technique. Korean J Pain 2014;27:43–8.Google Scholar
Boyle JJ, Singer KP, Milne N. Morphological survey of the cervicothoracic junctional region. Spine 1996;21:544–8.Google Scholar
An H, Wise J, Xu R. Anatomy of the cervicothoracic junction: a study of cadaveric dissection, cryomicrotomy and magnetic resonance imaging. J Spinal Dis 1999;12:519–25.Google Scholar
About the article
Published Online: 2018-07-12
Published in Print: 2018-10-25
Research funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in public, commercial or not- for- profit sectors.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent: Not applicable as this is a retrospective study, all data was de-identified and analyzed anonymously.
Ethical approval: This study was approved by institutional research review board with trial number 13-N-130 and was registered to the national trial registry with identifier number NTR 4294.
RO was responsible for the development of study protocol and the design of the study. RO also involved in data collection and contributed to the manuscript writing. CKC performed the data analysis, contributed to the development of study protocol, the study design and manuscript writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Citation Information: Scandinavian Journal of Pain, Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 747–753, ISSN (Online) 1877-8879, ISSN (Print) 1877-8860, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2018-0048.