Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Scandinavian Journal of Pain

Official Journal of the Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain

Editor-in-Chief: Breivik, Harald


CiteScore 2017: 0.84

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.401
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.452

Online
ISSN
1877-8879
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 19, Issue 2

Issues

The Oslo University Hospital Pain Registry: development of a digital chronic pain registry and baseline data from 1,712 patients

Lars-Petter Granan
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Pain Management and Research, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, P. O. Box 4956 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
  • Advisory Unit on Pain Management Health Region South-East, Oslo, Norway
  • Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway, Phone: +47 91 85 95 05
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Silje Endresen Reme
  • Advisory Unit on Pain Management Health Region South-East, Oslo, Norway
  • Department of Pain Management and Research, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Henrik Børsting Jacobsen
  • Advisory Unit on Pain Management Health Region South-East, Oslo, Norway
  • Department of Pain Management and Research, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • National Advisory Unit for Neuropathic Pain, Oslo, Norway
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Audun Stubhaug
  • Advisory Unit on Pain Management Health Region South-East, Oslo, Norway
  • Department of Pain Management and Research, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Tone Marte Ljoså
  • Advisory Unit on Pain Management Health Region South-East, Oslo, Norway
  • Department of Pain Management and Research, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2019-01-30 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2017-0160

Abstract

Background and aims

Chronic pain is a leading cause to years lived with disability worldwide. However, few of the interventions used in pain medicine have proven efficacy, and evidence from the existing studies may not be valid for the general pain population. Therefore, it is of utmost need that we describe chronic pain conditions in their most relevant aspects, their various guises, as well as the real world outcomes of our clinical interventions. The most obvious and crude way to make these assessments are through large registries where patient characteristics, treatment characteristics (including but not limited to what, when, how often and by whom), treatment outcomes and patient outcomes are scrutinized and recorded.

Methods and results

This article describes in detail the design and baseline data of the comprehensive Oslo University Hospital Pain Registry (OPR). OPR is the local registry of the largest university and interdisciplinary outpatient pain clinic in Norway. Data registration started in October 2015, and approximately 1,000 patients are assessed and treated at the clinic each year. During the first 2 years of running the OPR (through September 2017), a total of 1,712 patient baseline reports were recorded from 2,001 patients. Clinicians enter data about relevant treatments and interventions, while patients provide self-reported data on aspects related to pain and pain management. The patients complete an electronic registration immediately before their first consultation at the outpatient pain clinic. The baseline questions of the OPR cover: Basic demographics; The Modified Oswestry Disability Index to assess general function; A pain drawing to assess pain location; Questions regarding the temporal aspects of pain; Six 0–10 Numeric Rating Scales to assess pain intensity and bothersomeness; The EQ-5D-5L to measure health-related quality of life; The Hopkins Symptom Check List-25 to assess psychological distress; A single question about self-rated health; The general self-efficacy scale to assess the patient’s perceived self-efficacy; The Bodily Distress Syndrome checklist to assess functional disorders; The Injustice Experience Questionnaire to assess whether the patients experience injustice; Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire to assess fatigue; The Insomnia Severity Index to assesses the levels of insomnia symptoms; The Pain Catastrophizing Scale to measure pain catastrophizing and exaggerated negative orientation toward pain stimuli and pain experience; And the SF36v2 to assess patients’ self-report of generic health and wellbeing. The baseline data show that chronic pain patients have a high degree of negative impact in all aspects of their lives.

Conclusions and implications

The OPR is the most comprehensive pain registry for multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary outpatient pain clinics in Norway. Detailed design of the registry and key baseline data are presented. Registries are of great value in that they enable real world effectiveness outcomes for patients with chronic pain conditions. The OPR can thus serve as a model for similar initiatives elsewhere. The OPR cohort may also serve as a historical control in future studies, both with experimental and observational design.

Keywords: registry; epidemiology; patient reported outcome measures; chronic pain; effectiveness

References

  • [1]

    Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, Shibuya K, Salomon JA, Abdalla S, Aboyans V, Abraham J, Ackerman I, Aggarwal R, Ahn SY, Ali MK, Alvarado M, Anderson HR, Anderson LM, Andrews KG, Atkinson C, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380:2163–96.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [2]

    Granan L-P. When researchers stumble, clinicians fall and patients suffer. Eur J Pers Centered Healthc 2016;4:431–2.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [3]

    Bidonde J, Busch AJ, Schachter CL, Overend TJ, Kim SY, Góes SM, Boden C, Foulds HJ. Aerobic exercise training for adults with fibromyalgia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;6:CD012700.PubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [4]

    Geneen LJ, Moore RA, Clarke C, Martin D, Colvin LA, Smith BH. Physical activity and exercise for chronic pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;4:CD011279.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [5]

    Marin TJ, Van Eerd D, Irvin E, Couban R, Koes BW, Malmivaara A, van Tulder MW, Kamper SJ. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;6:CD002193.PubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [6]

    Parreira P, Heymans MW, van Tulder MW, Esmail R, Koes BW, Poquet N, Lin CC, Maher CG. Back schools for chronic non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;8:CD011674.PubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [7]

    Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet 2009;374:86–9.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [8]

    Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2005;2:e124.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [9]

    Iqbal SA, Wallach JD, Khoury MJ, Schully SD, Ioannidis JP. Reproducible research practices and transparency across the biomedical literature. PLoS Biol 2016;14:e1002333.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [10]

    Johnston BC, Alonso-Coello P, Friedrich JO, Mustafa RA, Tikkinen KA, Neumann I, Vandvik PO, Akl EA, da Costa BR, Adhikari NK, Dalmau GM, Kosunen E, Mustonen J, Crawford MW, Thabane L, Guyatt GH. Do clinicians understand the size of treatment effects? A randomized survey across 8 countries. CMAJ 2016;188:25–32.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11]

    Bromley Milton M, Börsbo B, Rovner G, Lundgren-Nilsson A, Stibrant-Sunnerhagen K, Gerdle B. Is pain intensity really that important to assess in chronic pain patients? A study based on the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation (SQRP). PLoS One 2013;8:e65483.Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [12]

    Sturgeon JA, Darnall BD, Kao MC, Mackey SC. Physical and psychological correlates of fatigue and physical function: a Collaborative Health Outcomes Information Registry (CHOIR) study. J Pain 2015;16:291–8.Web of SciencePubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13]

    Choinière M, Ware MA, Pagé MG, Lacasse A, Lanctôt H, Beaudet N, Boulanger A, Bourgault P, Cloutier C, Coupal L, De Koninck Y, Dion D, Dolbec P, Germain L, Martin V, Sarret P, Shir Y, Taillefer MC, Tousignant B, Trépanier A, et al. Development and implementation of a registry of patients attending multidisciplinary pain treatment clinics: The Quebec Pain Registry. Pain Res Manag 2017;2017:8123812.Web of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [14]

    Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980;66:271–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [15]

    Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Norwegian versions of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index. J Rehabil Med 2003;35:241–7.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [16]

    Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain 1986;27:117–26.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [17]

    Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1994;23:129–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [18]

    Keller S, Bann CM, Dodd SL, Schein J, Mendoza TR, Cleeland CS. Validity of the brief pain inventory for use in documenting the outcomes of patients with noncancer pain. Clin J Pain 2004;20:309–18.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [19]

    Tan G, Jensen MP, Thornby JI, Shanti BF. Validation of the Brief Pain Inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Pain 2004;5:133–7.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [20]

    Klepstad P, Loge JH, Borchgrevink PC, Mendoza TR, Cleeland CS, Kaasa S. The Norwegian brief pain inventory questionnaire: translation and validation in cancer pain patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 2002;24:517–25.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [21]

    The EuroQol Group. EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990;16:199–208.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [22]

    Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Rickels K, Uhlenhuth EH, Covi L. The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): a self-report symptom inventory. Behav Sci 1974;19:1–15.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23]

    Sandanger I, Nygard JF, Ingebrigtsen G, Sorensen T, Dalgard OS. Prevalence, incidence and age at onset of psychiatric disorders in Norway. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1999;34:570–9.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [24]

    Sandanger I, Moum T, Ingebrigtsen G, Sorensen T, Dalgard OS, Bruusgaard D. The meaning and significance of caseness: the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. II. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1999;34:53–9.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [25]

    Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, Rosseland LA, Romundstad L, Hals EK, Kvarstein G, Stubhaug A. Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth 2008;101:17–24.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [26]

    Holme I, Anderssen SA. Physical activity, smoking and mortality among men who participated in the Oslo studies of 1972 and 2000. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2014;134:1743–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [27]

    Idler EL, Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav 1997;38:21–37.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [28]

    Jylhä M. What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model. Soc Sci Med 2009;69:307–16.Web of SciencePubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [29]

    Benyamini Y. Why does self-rated health predict mortality? An update on current knowledge and a research agenda for psychologists. Psychol Health 2011;26:1407–13.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [30]

    Ganna A, Ingelsson E. 5 year mortality predictors in 498,103 UK Biobank participants: a prospective population-based study. Lancet 2015;386:533–40.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [31]

    Luszczynska A, Scholz U, Schwarzer R. The general self-efficacy scale: multicultural validation studies. J Psychol 2005;139:439–57.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [32]

    Martinez-Calderon J, Zamora-Campos C, Navarro-Ledesma S, Luque-Suarez A. The role of self-efficacy on the prognosis of chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review. J Pain 2018;19:10–34.Web of SciencePubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [33]

    Roysamb E, Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Norwegian version of the general perceived self-efficacy scale [Internett]. Oslo: University of Oslo, 1998. Available from: http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/health/norway.htm. Retrieved 2018-08-23.

  • [34]

    Fink P, Toft T, Hansen MS, Ornbol E, Olesen F. Symptoms and syndromes of bodily distress: an exploratory study of 978 internal medical, neurological, and primary care patients. Psychosom Med 2007;69:30–9.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [35]

    Sullivan MJ, Adams H, Horan S, Maher D, Boland D, Gross R. The role of perceived injustice in the experience of chronic pain and disability: scale development and validation. J Occup Rehabil 2008;18:249–61.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [36]

    Rodero B, Luciano JV, Montero-Marin J, Casanueva B, Palacin JC, Gili M, López del Hoyo Y, Serrano-Blanco A, Garcia-Campayo J. Perceived injustice in fibromyalgia: psychometric characteristics of the Injustice Experience Questionnaire and relationship with pain catastrophising and pain acceptance. J Psychosom Res 2012;73:86–91.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [37]

    Acquadro C, Conway K, Giroudet C, Mear I. Linguistic validation manual for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments. Lyon: Mapi Research Institute, 2004:184.Google Scholar

  • [38]

    Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, Erikson P, ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health 2005;8:94–104.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [39]

    Chalder T, Berelowitz G, Pawlikowska T, Watts L, Wessely S, Wright D, Wallace EP. Development of a fatigue scale. J Psychosom Res 1993;37:147–53.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [40]

    Loge JH, Ekeberg O, Kaasa S. Fatigue in the general Norwegian population: normative data and associations. J Psychosom Res 1998;45:53–65.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [41]

    Morin CM, Belleville G, Belanger L, Ivers H. The insomnia severity index: psychometric indicators to detect insomnia cases and evaluate treatment response. Sleep 2011;34:601–8.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [42]

    Bastien CH, Vallieres A, Morin CM. Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep Med 2001;2:297–307.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [43]

    Sullivan MJ, Bishop SR, Pivik J. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess 1995;7:524–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [44]

    Sullivan MJ, Stanish W, Waite H, Sullivan M, Tripp DA. Catastrophizing, pain, and disability in patients with soft-tissue injuries. Pain 1998;77:253–60.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [45]

    Fernandes L, Storheim K, Lochting I, Grotle M. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Norwegian pain catastrophizing scale in patients with low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012;13:111.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [46]

    Loge JH, Kaasa S, Hjermstad MJ, Kvien TK. Translation and performance of the Norwegian SF-36 Health Survey in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. I. Data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability, and construct validity. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:1069–76.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-11-05

Revised: 2019-01-03

Accepted: 2019-01-05

Published Online: 2019-01-30

Published in Print: 2019-04-24


Authors’ statements

Research funding: This article has been produced without funding sources.

Conflict of interest: The authors have nothing to disclose.

Informed consent: All patients have signed a written informed consent.

Ethical approval: This article contains only aggregated data, and is not in need of an approval from the Regional committees for medical and health research ethics (REK).

Authors’ contributions: LPG conceived the study and wrote the first draft. SER, HBJ, AS and TML have made substantial contributions to the revisions, additions and reflections resulting in the final manuscript.


Citation Information: Scandinavian Journal of Pain, Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 365–373, ISSN (Online) 1877-8879, ISSN (Print) 1877-8860, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2017-0160.

Export Citation

©2019 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. All rights reserved..Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in