Artus M, van der Windt D, Jordan K, Hay E. Low back pain symptoms show a similar pattern of improvement following a wide range of primary care treatments: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Rheumatology 2010;49:2346–56.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rabey M, Slater H, O’Sullivan P, Beales D, Smith A. Somatosensory nociceptive characteristics differentiate subgroups in people with chronic low back pain: a cluster analysis. Pain 2015;156:1874–84.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Rabey M, Smith A, Beales D, Slater H, O’Sullivan P. Differing psychologically-derived clusters in people with chronic low back pain are associated with different multidimensional profiles. Clin J Pain 2016;32:1015–27.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Rabey M, Smith A, Beales D, Slater H, O’Sullivan P. Pain provocation following sagittal plane repeated movements in people with chronic low back pain: associations with pain sensitivity and psychological profiles. Scand J Pain 2017;16:22–8.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Hush J, Stanton T, Siddall P, Marcuzzi A, Attal N. Untangling nociceptive, neuropathic and neuroplastic mechanisms underlying the biological domain of back pain. Pain Manag 2013;3:223–36.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Apeldoorn A, Ostelo R, van Helvoirt H, Fritz J, Knol D, van Tulder M, De Vet H. A randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of a classification-based system for sub-acute and chronic low back pain. Spine 2012;37:1347–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergbom S, Flink I, Boersma K, Linton S. Early psychologically informed interventions for workers at risk for pain-related disability: does matching treatment to profile improve outcome? J Occup Rehabil 2014;24:446–57.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Henry S, Van Dillen L, Ouellette-Morton R, Hitt J, Lomond K, DeSarno M, Bunn J. Outcomes are not different for patient-matched versus nonmatched treatment in subjects with chronic recurrent low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. Spine J 2014;14:2799–810.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kamper S, Maher C, Hancock M, Koes B, Croft P, Hay E. Treatment-based subgroups of low back pain: a guide to appraisal of research studies and a summary of current evidence. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2010;24:181–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Backonja M, Attal N, Baron R, Bouhassira D, Drangholt M, Dyck P, Edwards R, Freeman R, Gracely R, Haanpaa M, Hansson P, Hatem S, Krumova E, Jensen T, Maier C, Mick G, Rice A, Rolke R, Treede R, Serra J, et al. Value of quantitative sensory testing in neurological and pain disorders: NeuPSIG consensus. Pain 2013;154:1807–19.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Baron R, Förster M, Binder A. Subgrouping of patients with neuropathic pain according to pain-related sensory abnormalities: a first step to a stratified treatment approach. Lancet Neurol 2010;11:999–1005.Google Scholar
Rolke R, Baron R, Maier C, Tölle T, Treede R, Beyer A, Binder A, Birbaumer N, Birklein F, Bötefür I, Braune S, Flor H, Huge V, Klug R, Landwehrmeyer G, Magerl W, Maihöfner C, Rolko C, Schaub C, Scherens A, et al. Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values. Pain 2006;123:231–43.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scholz J, Mannion R, Hord D, Griffin R, Rawal B, Zheng H, Scoffings D, Phillips A, Guo J, Laing R, Abdi S, Decosterd I, Woolf C. A novel tool for the assessment of pain: validation in low back pain. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000047.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Rabey M, Poon C, Wray J, Thamajaree C, East R, Slater H. Pro-nociceptive and anti-nociceptive effects of a conditioned pain modulation protocol in participants with chronic low back pain and healthy control subjects. Man Ther 2015;20:763–8.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lovibond S, Lovibond P. Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. Sydney: School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, 1995.Google Scholar
Hasenbring M, Hallner D, Rusu A. Fear-avoidance- and endurance-related responses to pain: development and validation of the avoidance-endurance questionnaire (AEQ). Eur J Pain 2009;13:620–8.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Fish R, McGuire B, Hogan M, Morrison T, Stewart I. Validation of the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire (CPAQ) in an internet sample and development and preliminary validation of the CPAQ-8. Pain 2010;149:435–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main C. A fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain 1993;52:157–68.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan M, Thibault P, Andrikonyte J, Butler H, Catchlove R, Larivière C. Psychological influences on repetition-induced summation of activity-related pain in patients with chronic low back pain. Pain 2009;141:70–8.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Salaffi F, Stancati A, Silvestri C, Ciapetti A, Grassi W. Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J Pain 2004;8:283–91.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen A, Vach W, Kent P, Hestbaek L, Kongsted A. Using existing questionnaires in latent class analysis: should we use summary scores or single items as input? A methodological study using a cohort of patients with low back pain. Clin Epidemiol 2016;8:73–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Nielsen A, Kent P, Hestbaek L, Vach W, Kongsted A. Identifying subgroups of patients using latent class analysis: should we use a single-stage or a two-stage approach? A methodological study using a cohort of patients with low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017;18:57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nylund K, Asparouhov A, Muthén B. Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a monte carlo simulation study. Struct Equ Model 2007;14:535–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swanson S, Lindenberg K, Bauer S, Crosby R. A Monte Carlo investigation of factors influencing latent class analysis: an application to eating disorder research. Int J Eat Disord 2012;45:677–84.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vlaeyen J, de Jong J, Geilen M, Heuts P, van Breukelen G. Graded exposure in vivo in the treatment of pain-related fear: a replicated single-case experimental design in four patients with chronic low back pain. Behav Res Ther 2001;39:151–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Sullivan P, Caneiro J, O’Keeffe M, Smith A, Dankaerts W, Fersum K, O’Sullivan K. Cognitive functional therapy: an integrated behavioral approach for the targeted management of disabling low back pain. Phys Ther 2018;98:408–23.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vibe Fersum K, O’Sullivan P, Skouen J, Smith A, Kvåle A. Efficacy of classification-based cognitive functional therapy in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pain 2013;17:916–28.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Moberg E. Two point discrimination test. A valuable part of hand surgical rehabilitation. Scand J Rehabil Med 1990;22:127–34.Google Scholar
Dworkin R, Turk D, Farrar J, Haythornthwaite J, Jensen M, Katz N, Kerns R, Stucki G, Allen R, Bellamy N, Carr D, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dionne R, Galer B, Hertz S, Jadad A, Kramer L, Manning D, Martin S, et al. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2005;113:9–19.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linton S, Boersma K. Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire. Clin J Pain 2003;19:80–6.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Wand B, Catley M, Rabey M, O’Sullivan P, O’Connell N, Smith A. Disrupted self-perception in people with chronic low back pain. Further evaluation of the Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire. J Pain 2016;17:1001–12.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Weel C, König-Zahn C, Touw-Otten F, Van Duijn N, Meyboom-De Jong B. Measuring functional status with the COOP/WONCA charts: a manual, 2nd ed. UMCG/University of Groningen, Research Institute SHARE, 2012.Google Scholar
Öhlund C, Eek C, Palmblad S, Areskoug B, Nachemson A. Quantified pain drawing in subacute low back pain: validation in a nonselected outpatient industrial sample. Spine 1996;21:1021–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Macfarlane G, Croft P, Schollum J, Silman A. Widespread pain: is an improved classification possible? J Rheumatology 1996;23:1628–32.Google Scholar
Buysse D, Reynolds C, Monk T, Berman S, Kupfer D. The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res 1989;28:193–213.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
IPAQ Group. Guidelines for data processing and analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) – Short and Long Forms [Online]. Available at: https://sites.google.com/site/theipaq/scoring-protocol. Accessed: 4 Apr 2013.
About the article
Published Online: 2019-06-29
Research funding: MR was supported by: Australian Postgraduate Award, Curtin University Postgraduate Scholarship, Musculoskeletal Association of Chartered Physiotherapists Doctoral Award, Chartered Society of Physiotherapy Charitable Trust. DB was supported by: National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia.
Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.
Informed consent: Informed consent has been obtained from all individuals included in this study.
Ethical approval: The research related to human use complies with all the relevant national regulations, institutional policies and was performed in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and was approved by the Curtin University Human Research Ethics Committee (EC00262), Approval Number: HR112/2012; Royal Perth Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee, Approval Number: EC 2012-148; Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee, Approval Number: 2012-197; and Fremantle Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee, Approval Number: AR/13/1.
Declarations of interest: None.
Citation Information: Scandinavian Journal of Pain, 20190073, ISSN (Online) 1877-8879, ISSN (Print) 1877-8860, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2019-0073.