Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Zeitschrift für Slawistik

Ed. by Kosta, Peter / Kuße, Holger / Prunitsch, Christian / Udolph, Ludger

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2017: 0.16

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.148
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.055

Online
ISSN
2196-7016
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Just Accepted

Issues

Ditransitive Verben – ein Problemfall im Bulgarischen?1

Uwe Junghanns / Denisa Lenertová
Published Online: 2009-09-25 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/slaw.2008.0011

Summary

Slavic languages show differences in the syntactic realization of arguments of ditransitive verbs as, e.g., give. While Czech and Russian use dative indirect objects (IOs) which precede the direct object (DO), IOs of ditransitives in Bulgarian are marked by a preposition-like element na and follow the DO. Within a framework assuming that Argument Structure is a component part of verbal lexical entries (cf. Bierwisch 1996, a.o.) and syntactic structure of the VP is projected from the lexicon depending on the argument hierarchy, the question arises what is the basic linearization of arguments of ditransitives in Russian, Czech, and Bulgarian. We will argue that the two structures attested in the languages under investigation do not correspond to what has become known as Dative Alternation in English and that there is no need for specific semantic representations for Bulgarian ditransitives. In the relevant cases, the hierarchy of argument variables is changed through application of a semantic template. This accounts for the unmarked DO > IO order in Bulgarian.

Keywords: ditransitive verbs; direct object; dative alternation; unmarked word order; argument hierarchy

About the article

Published Online: 2009-09-25

Published in Print: 2008-06-01


Citation Information: Zeitschrift für Slawistik, Volume 53, Issue 2/2008, Pages 143–159, ISSN (Print) 0044-3506, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/slaw.2008.0011.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Hagen Pitsch
Russian Linguistics, 2010, Volume 34, Number 3, Page 307

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in