Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Zeitschrift für Slawistik

Ed. by Kosta, Peter / Kuße, Holger / Prunitsch, Christian / Udolph, Ludger

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2017: 0.16

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.148
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.055

Online
ISSN
2196-7016
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 54, Issue 4

Issues

Zur Geschichte des referentiellen Nullsubjekts im Russischen

Roland Meyer
Published Online: 2010-04-16 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/slaw.2009.0026

Abstract

Russian has changed diachronically from a clearcut null subject (pro drop) language to a language which allows, and in certain registers demands, weak coreferential subject pronouns. Concomitantly, the preterite system underwent morphological simplification and the obviation of person information. The coincidence of these two developments has been taken as evidence for a close connection between null subjects and the explicitness of verbal morphology, both in traditional, and in recent formally as well as grammaticalization-oriented approaches. The present article evaluates evidence from the Novgorod birchbark documents, and from four narrative text samples from the XI.-XVIII. century. In contrast to earlier studies, it is argued that only the relative amount of null subjects, compared to pronominal and nominal subjects with equal features should be taken into consideration. Furthermore, a distinction between 1./2. person on the one hand and 3. person on the other is instrumental for an understanding of the changes involved. The results indicate that 1./2. person null subjects declined between the XV. and XVII. century, almost at the same rate as the morphologically explicit preterite forms, whereas 3. person null subjects remained in use for a longer time, before being replaced by a weak, semantically bleached, personal pronoun. I therefore argue that the impoverishment of agreement morphology is sufficient to explain the decline of pro drop in 1./2. person, a 3. person null morpheme being available in the auxiliary paradigm until at least the XV. century. The development of the 3. person null subject involves at least one further factor, namely, the rise of a weak pronoun.

Keywords: null subject (pro drop) language; coreferential subject pronouns; morphological; simplification; explicitness of verbal morphology

About the article

Published Online: 2010-04-16

Published in Print: 2009-12-01


Citation Information: Zeitschrift für Slawistik, Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages 375–397, ISSN (Print) 0044-3506, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/slaw.2009.0026.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Journal of Historical Linguistics, 2015, Volume 5, Number 1, Page 139

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in