Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric

The Journal of University of Bialystok

4 Issues per year

Cite Score 2016: 0.26

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.166
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.275

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Multidimensional Risk Management for Underground Electricity Networks

Thalles V. Garcez / Przemyslaw Szufel
Published Online: 2014-08-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2014-0017


In the paper we consider an electricity provider company that makes decision on allocating resources on electric network maintenance. The investments decrease malfunction rate of network nodes. An accidental event (explosion, fire, etc.) or a malfunctioning on underground system can have various consequences and in different perspectives, such as deaths and injuries of pedestrians, fires in nearby locations, disturbances in the flow of vehicular traffic, loss to the company image, operating and financial losses, etc. For this reason it is necessary to apply an approach of the risk management that considers the multidimensional view of the consequences. Furthermore an analysis of decision making should consider network dependencies between the nodes of the electricity distribution system. In the paper we propose the use of the simulation to assess the network effects (such as the increase of the probability of other accidental event and the occurrence of blackouts of the dependent nodes) in the multidimensional risk assessment in electricity grid. The analyzed effects include node overloading due to malfunction of adjacent nodes and blackouts that take place where there is temporarily no path in the grid between the power plant and a node. The simulation results show that network effects have crucial role for decisions in the network maintenance – outcomes of decisions to repair a particular node in the network can have significant influence on performance of other nodes. However, those dependencies are non-linear. The effects of network connectivity (number of connections between nodes) on its multidimensional performance assessment depend heavily on the overloading effect level. The simulation results do not depend on network type structure (random or small world) – however simulation outcomes for random networks have shown higher variance compared to small-world networks.

Keywords: cascade failure; network decision making; underground electricity grids


  • Ackoff, R. L. (1971). Towards a system of systems concepts. Management science 17(11), 661–671.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Almeida, A. T. de (2001). Multicriteria decision making on maintenance: Spares and contracts planning. European Journal of Operational Research, 129, 235–241.Google Scholar

  • Dueñas-Osorio, L. and Vemuru, S. M. (2009). Cascading failures in complex infrastructure systems. Structural Safety 31, 157–167.Google Scholar

  • Erdös P. & Rényi A. (1960). On the evolution of random graphs. Publications of the Mathematical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 5, 17–61.Google Scholar

  • Garcez, T. V., & Almeida, A. T. de. (2013). Multidimensional Risk Assessment of Manhole Events as a Decision Tool for Ranking the Vaults of an Underground Electricity Distribution System. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 1–1. doi:10.1109/TPWRD.2013.2273083CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Gilbert, N., & Troitzsch, K. G. (2005). Simulation for the social scientist, McGraw-Hill International.Google Scholar

  • Hagberg A. A., Schult D. A, Swart P.J. (2008). Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX. Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy2008), Pasadena, CA USA, 11–15.Google Scholar

  • Han, Z. X., & Cao, Y. J. (2004). Power system security and its prevention. Power System Technology, 28, 1–6.Google Scholar

  • Holland, J.H. (1992). Complex Adaptive Systems, Daedalus, 121(1), 17–30.Google Scholar

  • Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H. (1976). Decision With Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

  • Koch, B., & Carpentier, Y. (1992). Manhole explosions due to arcing faults on underground secondary distribution cables in ducts. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 7(3), 1425–1433. doi:10.1109/61.141861CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Law, A. M. (2007). Simulation modeling and analysis, Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar

  • Li, W., & Lu, J. (2005). Risk Evaluation of Combinative Transmission Network and Substation Configurations and its Application in Substation Planning. IEEE Transactions On Power Systems, 20(2), May 2005.Google Scholar

  • Mitchell M. (2009). Complexity – a guided tour, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Python Software Foundation. Python Language Reference, version 3.3. Available at http://www.python.org.Google Scholar

  • Rudin, C., Waltz, D., Anderson, R. N., Boulanger, A., Salleb-Aouissi, A., Chow, M., … Wu, L. (2012). Machine learning for the New York City power grid. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 34(2), 328–45. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2011.108CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sayamam H. (2013). PyCX: a Python-based simulation code repository for complex systems education, Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling 2013, 1:2.Google Scholar

  • Sun, K. (2005). Complex Networks Theory: A New Method of Research in Power Grid. IEEE Conference & Exhibition: Asia and Pacific Dalian, China.Google Scholar

  • Walsh, B. P., & Black, W. Z. (2005). Thermodynamic and Mechanical Analysis of Short Circuit Events in an Underground Vault. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 20(3), 2235–2240. doi:10.1109/TPWRD.2005.848445CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Watts D.J. and Strogatz S.H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks, Nature, 393, 440–442Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Wildberger, A. M. (1997). Complex adaptive systems: concepts and power industry applications. IEEE Control Systems, 17, 77–88Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2014-08-08

Citation Information: Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 51–69, ISSN (Online) 2199-6059, ISSN (Print) 0860-150X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2014-0017.

Export Citation

© 2014 Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in