Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics

Ed. by Mizrach, Bruce

5 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.855

CiteScore 2017: 0.76

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.668
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.894

Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) 2017: 0.02

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 9, Issue 4


Forecasting Stock Market Volatility with Regime-Switching GARCH Models

Juri Marcucci
Published Online: 2005-12-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1558-3708.1145

In this paper we compare a set of different standard GARCH models with a group of Markov Regime-Switching GARCH (MRS-GARCH) in terms of their ability to forecast the US stock market volatility at horizons that range from one day to one month. To take into account the excessive persistence usually found in GARCH models that implies too smooth and too high volatility forecasts, in the MRS-GARCH models all parameters switch between a low and a high volatility regime. Both gaussian and fat-tailed conditional distributions for the residuals are assumed, and the degrees of freedom can also be state-dependent to capture possible time-varying kurtosis. The forecasting performances of the competing models are evaluated both with statistical and risk-management loss functions. Under statistical losses, we use both tests of equal predictive ability of the Diebold-Mariano-type and test of superior predictive ability. Under risk-management losses, we use a two-step selection procedure where we first check which models pass the tests of correct unconditional or conditional coverage and then we compare the best models under two subjective VaR-based loss functions. The empirical analysis demonstrates that MRS-GARCH models do really outperform all standard GARCH models in forecasting volatility at horizons shorter than one week under both statistical and VaR-based risk-management loss functions. In particular, all tests reject the presence of a better model than the MRS-GARCH with normal innovations. However, at forecast horizons longer than one week, standard asymmetric GARCH models tend to be superior.

This article offers supplementary material which is provided at the end of the article.

About the article

Published Online: 2005-12-08

Citation Information: Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, Volume 9, Issue 4, ISSN (Online) 1558-3708, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1558-3708.1145.

Export Citation

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Supplementary Article Materials

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Junru Zhang, Hadrian Djajadikerta, and Zhaoyong Zhang
Sustainability, 2018, Volume 10, Number 10, Page 3361
David Ardia, Keven Bluteau, Kris Boudt, and Leopoldo Catania
International Journal of Forecasting, 2018, Volume 34, Number 4, Page 733
Jiyoung Lee and Eunju Hwang
Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods, 2018, Volume 25, Number 1, Page 29
Yuri Ichkitidze
The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2017
兰兰 容
Advances in Applied Mathematics, 2017, Volume 06, Number 06, Page 768
Kin-Yip Ho, Yanlin Shi, and Zhaoyong Zhang
International Review of Economics & Finance, 2017
Salim Lahmiri
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2017, Volume 471, Page 387
Roberto Ferulano
Journal of Asset Management, 2009, Volume 10, Number 2, Page 124
Pedro Correia S. Bezerra and Pedro Henrique M. Albuquerque
Computational Management Science, 2017, Volume 14, Number 2, Page 179
EnDer Su
International Review of Economics & Finance, 2017, Volume 47, Page 233
Yanlin Shi, Kin-Yip Ho, and Wai-Man Liu
International Review of Economics & Finance, 2016, Volume 42, Page 291
Soheil Almasi Monfared and David Enke
Procedia Computer Science, 2015, Volume 61, Page 80
Ari Abramson and Israel Cohen
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2007, Volume 55, Number 7, Page 3227
Yanlin Shi and Kin-Yip Ho
Journal of Banking & Finance, 2015, Volume 61, Page S189
En-Der Su and Feng-Jeng Lin
Computational Economics, 2012, Volume 39, Number 3, Page 259
Bartosz Gębka and Dobromił Serwa
International Review of Financial Analysis, 2015, Volume 39, Page 147
Hung‐Chun Liu and Jui‐Cheng Hung
Managerial Finance, 2010, Volume 36, Number 10, Page 860
Daniel Zieling, Antje Mahayni, and Sven Balder
Journal of Banking & Finance, 2014, Volume 43, Page 212
Amir H. Alizadeh and Alexandros Gabrielsen
Journal of Banking & Finance, 2013, Volume 37, Number 8, Page 3125
Enrique Salvador and Vicent Aragó
Journal of Futures Markets, 2014, Volume 34, Number 4, Page 374
Nikos K. Nomikos and Panos K. Pouliasis
Energy Economics, 2011, Volume 33, Number 2, Page 321

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in