Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics

Ed. by Mizrach, Bruce

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.448
5-years IMPACT FACTOR: 0.877

CiteScore 2018: 0.85

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.552
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.561

Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) 2018: 0.07

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 19, Issue 3


Bank characteristics and the interbank money market: a distributional approach

Giulia Iori / Burcu Kapar / Jose Olmo
  • Corresponding author
  • School of Social Sciences, Economics Division, University of Southampton, Room 3015, Bld 58 (Murray Bld), Highfield Campus, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-05-21 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/snde-2014-0030


This paper studies the relationship between bank characteristics, such as size, nationality, operating currency and sovereign debt in the parent country, and the distribution of funding spreads observed in the e-MID interbank money market during the Great financial crisis. Our setup is a pseudo-panel with a random number of international banks acting in the interbank market in each period. We develop new econometric tools for panel data with random effects and discrete covariates, such as a nonparametric kernel estimator of the distribution function of the response variable conditional on a set of covariates and a consistent test of first order stochastic dominance. Our empirical results, based on these tests, shed light on the survivorship bias in the e-Mid market, and reveal the existence of a risk premium on small banks, banks with currencies different from the Euro, and banks based on countries under sovereign debt distress in the periphery of the European Union. Finally we assess the impact of policy intervention in the aftermath of the financial crisis.

Keywords: e-mid interbank money market; nonparametric kernel estimation; panel data methods; random effects; stochastic dominance tests

JEL classification:: C12; C14; G01; G20


  • Acharya, V. V., and T. Yorulmazer. 2008. “Information Contagion and Bank Herding.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 40: 215–231.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Acharya, V. V., and O. Merrouche. 2013. “Precautionary Hoarding of Liquidity and Inter-bank Markets: Evidence from the Sub-prime Crisis.” Review of Finance 17 (1): 107–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Acharya, V. V., D. Gromb, and T. Yorulmazer. 2008. “Imperfect Competition in the Interbank Market for Liquidity as a Rationale for Central Banking.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 4 (2): 184–217.Google Scholar

  • Afonso, G., A. Kovner, and A. Schoar. 2011. “Stressed, Not Frozen: The Federal Funds Market in the Financial Crisis.” Journal of Finance 66: 1109–1139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Aitchison, J., and C. G. G. Aitken. 1976. “Multivariate Binary Discrimination by the Kernel Method.” Biometrika 63: 413–420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Akram, F. A., and C. Christophersen. 2010. “Interbank Overnight Rates-Gains from Systemic Importance.” Working Paper No. 11, Norges Bank.Google Scholar

  • Allen, L., and A. Saunders. 1986. “The Large-Small Bank Dichotomy in the Federal Funds Market.” Journal of Banking and Finance 10: 219–230.Google Scholar

  • Angelini, P. 2000. “Are Banks Risk-averse? A Note on the Intraday Timing of Operations in the Interbank Market.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 32: 54–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Angelini, P., G. Mariesca, and D. Russo. 1996. “Systemic Risk in the Netting System.” Journal of Banking and Finance 20: 853–868.Google Scholar

  • Angelini, P., A. Nobili, and C. Picillo. 2011. “The Interbank Market after August 2007: What Has Changed and Why?” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 43: 923–958.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Arciero, L. 2010. “Extracting Information on the Interbank Market from Payment System Data.” Mimeo, Bank of Italy.Google Scholar

  • Arciero, L., R. Heijmans, R. Heuver, M. Massarenti, C. Picillo, and F. Vacirca. 2013. “How to Measure the Unsecured Money Market? Eurosystem’s Implementation and Validation using TARGET2 Data.” Working Paper No. 367, De Nederlandsche Bank.Google Scholar

  • Ashcraft, A., J. McAndrews, and D. Skeie. 2011. “Precautionary Reserves and the Interbank Market.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 43: 311–348.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baglioni, A., and A. Monticini. 2008. “The Intraday Price of Money: Evidence from the e-MID Interbank Market.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 40: 1533–1540.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baglioni, A., and A. Monticini. 2010. “The Intraday Interest Rate under a Liquidity Crisis: The Case of August 2007.” Economics Letters 107 (2): 198–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baltagi, B. H. 2008. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. West Sussex: Johhn Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

  • Barrett, G., and S. Donald. 2003. “Consistent Tests for Stochastic Dominance.” Econometrica 71: 71–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beaupain, R., and A. Durre. 2011. “Inferring Trading Dynamics for an OTC Market: The Case of the Euro Area Overnight Money Market.” Quantitative Finance 11 (9): 1285–1295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beaupain, R., and A. Durre. 2013. “Central Bank Reserves and Interbank Market Liquidity in the Euro Area.” Journal of Financial Intermediation 22: 259–284.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bhattacharya, S., and D. Gale. 1987. “Preference Shocks, Liquidity and Central Bank Policy" In New Approaches to Monetary Economics, edited by W. Barnett, and K. Singleton, 69–88. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Blavarg, M., and P. Nimander. 2002. “Interbank Exposures and Systemic Risk.” Sveriges Riksbank Economic Review 2: 19–45.Google Scholar

  • Brousseau, V., and A. Manzanares. 2005. “A Look at Intraday Frictions in the Euro Area Overnight Deposit Market.” Working Paper No. 439, European Central Bank.Google Scholar

  • Brunetti, C., M. Filippo, and J. H. Harris. 2011. “Effects of Central Bank Intervention on the Interbank Market During the Subprime Crisis.” Review of Financial Studies 24 (6): 2053–2083.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buja, A., T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. 1989. “Linear Smoothers and Additive Models.” Annals of Statistics 17: 453–555.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cassola, N., C. Holthausen, and M. L. Duca. 2010. “The 2007/2009 Turmoil: A Challenge for the Integration of the Euro Area Money Market?” Mimeo. European Central Bank.Google Scholar

  • Chernozhukov, V., S. Lee, and A. Rosen. 2013. “Intersection Bounds: Estimation and Inference.” Econometrica 81 (2): 667–737.Google Scholar

  • Cocco J. F., F. J. Gomes, and N. C. Martins. 2009. “Lending Relationships in the Interbank Market.” Journal of Financial Intermediation 18: 24–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davidson, R., and J. Y. Duclos. 2000. “Statistical Inference for Stochastic Dominance and for the Measurement of Poverty and Inequality.” Econometrica 68: 1435–1464.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Diamond, D. W., and P. H. Dybvig. 1983. “Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance and Liquidity.” Journal of Political Economy 91: 401–419.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Doukhan, P., P. Massart, and E. Rio. 1995. “Invariance Principles for Absolutely Regular Empirical Processes.” Annales de l’Institut H. Poincare 31: 393–427.Google Scholar

  • Eisenschmidt, J., and J. Tapking. 2009. “Liquidity Risk Premia in Unsecured Interbank Money Markets.” Working Paper No. 1025, European Central Bank.Google Scholar

  • European Central Bank, 2009. “Annual Report.” Accessed October 15, 2014. http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/annrep/ar2009en.pdf.

  • Finger, K., D. Fricke, and T. Lux. 2012. “Network Analysis of the e-MID Overnight Money Market: The Informational Value of Different Aggregation Levels for Intrinsic Dynamic Processes.” Working Paper No. 1782, Kiel Institute.Google Scholar

  • Fishburn, P. C. 1977. “Mean-Risk Analysis with Risk Associated with Below-Target Returns.” The American Economic Review 67: 116–126.Google Scholar

  • Freixas, X., and C. Holthausen. 2004. “Interbank Market Integration under Asymmetric Information.” Review of Financial Studies 18 (2): 459–490.Google Scholar

  • Freixas, X. B., and J. Jorge. 2008. “The Role of Interbank Markets in Monetary Policy: A Model with Rationing.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 40: 1151–1176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Freixas, X., B. M. Parigi, and J. Rochet. 2000. “Systemic Risk, Interbank Relations and Liquidity Provision by the Central Bank.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 32: 611–638.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Furfine, C. H. 1999. “The Microstructure of the Federal Funds Market.” Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments 8: 24–44.Google Scholar

  • Furfine, C. H. 2001. “Banks as Monitors of Other Banks: Evidence from the Overnight Federal Funds Market.” The Journal of Business 74: 33–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gabbi, G., G. Germano, B. Kapar, V. Hatzopoulos, G. Iori, and M. Politi. 2014. “Market Microstructure, Banks’ Behaviour, and Interbank Spreads.” Accessed October 15, 2014. http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/3950/.

  • Gabrieli, S. 2011a. “The Functioning of the European Interbank Market during the 2007–2008 Financial Crisis.” Working Paper No. 158, CEIS Tor Vergata.Google Scholar

  • Gabrieli, S. 2011b. “The Microstructure of the Money Market Before and After the Financial Crisis: A Network Perspective.” Working Paper No. 181, CEIS Tor Vergata.Google Scholar

  • Gaspar, V., G. P. Quiros, and H. R. Mendizabal. 2008. “Interest Rate Dispersion and Volatility in the Market for Daily Funds.” European Economic Review 52: 413–440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gonzalo, J., and J. Olmo. 2014. “Conditional Stochastic Dominance Tests.” International Economic Review 55 (3): 819–838.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hall, P., Q. Li, and J. Racine. 2004. “Cross-Validation and the Estimation of Conditional Probability Densities.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 99: 1015–1026.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hansen, B. E. 1996. “Inference when a Nuisance Parameter is not Identified Under the Null Hypothesis.” Econometrica 64: 413–430.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hastie, T., and R. Tibshirani. 1990. Generalized Additive Models. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar

  • Heider, F., M. Hoerova, and C. Holthausen. 2009. “Liquidity Hoarding and Interbank Market Spreads: The Role of Counterparty Risk.” Working Paper No. 1126, European Central Bank.Google Scholar

  • Heijmans, R., R. Heuver, and D. Walraven. 2010. “Monitoring the Unsecured Interbank Money Market using TARGET2 Data.” Working Paper 276, De Nederlandsche Bank.Google Scholar

  • Ho, T., and A. Saunders. 1985. “A Micro-Model of the Federal Funds Market.” Journal of Finance 40: 977–990.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Iori, G., and O. V. Precup. 2007. “Weighted Network Analysis of High-frequency Cross-correlation Measures.”Physical Review 75: 36–110.Google Scholar

  • Iori, G., R. Ren, G. D. Masi, and G. Caldarelli. 2007. “Trading Strategies in the Italian Interbank Market.” Physica 376: 467–479.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Iori, G., G. D. Masi, O. V. Precup, G. Gabbi, and G. Caldarelli. 2008. “A Network Analysis of the Italian Overnight Money Market.” Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 32: 259–278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jun, S. J., Y. Lee, and Y. Shin. 2011. “Testing for Distributional Treatment Effects: A Set Identification Approach.” Working Paper.Google Scholar

  • Li, Q., and J. S. Racine. 2008. “Nonparametric Estimation of Conditional CDF and Quantile Functions with Mixed Categorical and Continuous Data.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 26: 423–434.Google Scholar

  • Linton, O., E. Maasoumi, and Y. J. Whang. 2005. “Consistent Testing for Stochastic Dominance under General Sampling Schemes.” Review of Economic Studies 72: 735–765.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Monticini, A., and F. Ravazzolo. 2014.”Forecasting the Intraday Market Price of Money.” Journal of Empirical Finance. Accessed September 6, 2014. ISSN 0927–5398. DOI: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2014.08.006.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nadaraya, E. A. 1965. “On Nonparametric Estimates of Density Functions and Regression Curves.” Theory of Applied Probability 10: 186–190.Google Scholar

  • Newey, W. K. 1994. “Kernel Estimation of Partial Means and a General Variance Estimator.” Econometric Theory 10: 233–253.Google Scholar

  • Northcott, C. A. S. 2002. “Estimating Settlement Risk and the Potential for Contagion in Canada’s Automated Clearing Settlement System.” Working Paper No: 41, Bank of Canada.Google Scholar

  • Rochet, J. C., and J. Tirole. 1996. “Interbank Lending and Systemic Risk.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 28: 733–762.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scaillet, O., and N. Topaloglu. 2010. “Testing for Stochastic Dominance Efficiency.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 28: 169–180.Google Scholar

  • Stigum, M. 1990. The Money Market. Third Edition. Homewood, Ill.: Dow Jones-Irwin.Google Scholar

  • Upper, C. 2011. “Simulation Methods to Assess the Danger of Contagion in Interbank Markets.” Journal of Financial Stability 7: 111–125.Google Scholar

  • van der Vaart, A. W., and J. A. Wellner. 1996. Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Vento, G. A., and P. L. Ganga. 2010. “Interbank Market and Liquidity Distribution During the Great Financial Crisis: The e-MID Case.” Journal of Money, Investment and Banking 18: 68–94.Google Scholar

  • Watson, G. S. 1964. “Smooth Regression Analysis.” Sankhy: The Indian Journal of Statistics 26 (4): 359–372.Google Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Jose Olmo, School of Social Sciences, Economics Division, University of Southampton, Room 3015, Bld 58 (Murray Bld), Highfield Campus, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK, e-mail:

Published Online: 2015-05-21

Published in Print: 2015-06-01

Citation Information: Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 249–283, ISSN (Online) 1558-3708, ISSN (Print) 1081-1826, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/snde-2014-0030.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Simone Berardi and Gabriele Tedeschi
International Review of Economics & Finance, 2017, Volume 47, Page 255
Inom Mirzaev, Erin C Byrne, and David M Bortz
Inverse Problems, 2016, Volume 32, Number 9, Page 095005

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in