Abstract
Locating political parties correctly regarding different policy issues is not just crucial for research on parties, party competition, and many similar fields but also for the electorate. For the latter, it has become more and more important as the relevance of voting advice applications (VAA) has increased and as their main usage is to compare citizens’ policy preferences to the offer of political parties. However, if party positions are not adequately assigned, citizens are provided with suboptimal information which decreases the citizens’ capacities to make rational electoral decision. VAA designers follow different approaches to determining party positions. In this paper, we look beyond most common sources like electoral manifestos and expert judgments by using surveys of electoral candidates to validate and improve VAAs. We argue that by using positions derived from candidate surveys we get the information by the source itself, but at the same time we overcome most of the disadvantages of the other methods. Using data for the 2014 European Parliament election both in Greece and Germany, we show that while positions taken from the VAAs and from the candidate surveys do match more often than not, we also find substantive differences and even opposing positions. Moreover, these occasional differences have already rather severe consequences looking at calculated overlaps between citizens and parties as well as representations of the political competition space and party system polarization. These differences seem to be more pronounced in Greece. We conclude that candidate surveys are indeed a valid additional source to validate and improve VAAs.
Funding source: European Cooperation in Science and Technology
Award Identifier / Grant number: COST-STSM-ECOST-STSM-IS1304-030914-048949
Funding statement: European Cooperation in Science and Technology, Funder Id: 10.13039/501100000921, Grant Number: COST-STSM-ECOST-STSM-IS1304-030914-048949.
References
Andeweg, R. B. (2011) “Approaching Perfect Policy Congruence Measurement, Development, and Relevance for Political Representation,” In: (Rosema, M., B. Denters and K. Aarts, eds.) How Democracy Works: Political Representation and Policy Congruence in Modern Societies : Essays in Honour of Jacques Thomassen, Amsterdam: Pallas Publications, pp. 39–52.10.1017/9789048513369.004Search in Google Scholar
Andreadis, I. (2013) Voting Advice Applications: A Successful Nexus Between Informatics and Political Science. In: Proceedings of the 6th Balkan Conference in Informatics, New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp. 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1145/2490257.2490263.10.1145/2490257.2490263Search in Google Scholar
Andreadis, I. (2015) Estimating the Position of Political Parties: Comparison between an Expert Survey and a Candidate Survey. In: NECE conference. Thessaloniki.Search in Google Scholar
Andreadis, I. (2016) The Greek Candidate Study 2015. Ann Arbor, MI. https://doi.org/10.3886/E62191V1.Search in Google Scholar
Andreadis, I. and E. Kartsounidou (in press) “The Impact of Splitting a Long Online Questionnaire on Data Quality,” Survey Research Methods.Search in Google Scholar
Andreadis, I. and Y. Stavrakakis (2017) “European Populist Parties in Government: How Well are Voters Represented? Evidence from Greece,” Swiss Political Science Review, 23(4): 485–508.10.1111/spsr.12255Search in Google Scholar
Andreadis, I. and M. Wall (2014) “The Impact of Voting Advice Applications on Vote Choice.” In: (Garzia, D and S. Marschall, eds.) Matching Voters with Parties and Candidates. Voting Advice Applications in Comparative Perspective. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 115–128.Search in Google Scholar
Banducci, S., H. Giebler, and S. Kritzinger (2017) “Knowing More from Less: How the Information Environment Increases Knowledge of Party Positions,” British Journal of Political Science, 47(03):571–588.10.1017/S0007123415000204Search in Google Scholar
Belchior, A. M., E. Tsatsanis, and C. P. Teixeira (2016) “Representation in Times of Crisis: Deputy–voter Congruence on Views of Representation in Portugal,” International Political Science Review, 37(2):277–293.10.1177/0192512114562295Search in Google Scholar
Budge, I. (2000) “Expert Judgements of Party Policy Positions: Uses and Limitations in Political Research,” European Journal of Political Research, 37(1):103–113.10.1111/1475-6765.00506Search in Google Scholar
Costello, R., J. Thomassen, and M. Rosema (2012) “European Parliament Elections and Political Representation: Policy Congruence between Voters and Parties,” West European Politics, 35(6):1226–1248.10.4324/9781003061335-2Search in Google Scholar
Dolný, B. and P. Baboš (2015) “Voter–Representative Congruence in Europe: A Loss of Institutional Influence?” West European Politics, 38(6):1274–1304.10.1080/01402382.2015.1053180Search in Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.Search in Google Scholar
Freire, A., M. Lisi, I. Andreadis, and J. M. Leite Viegas (2014) “Political Representation in Bailed-out Southern Europe: Greece and Portugal Compared,” South European Society and Politics, 19(4):413–433.10.1080/13608746.2014.984381Search in Google Scholar
Garzia, D. and S. Marschall (eds.) (2014) Matching Voters with Parties and Candidates: Voting Advice Applications in Comparative Perspective. Colchester: ECPR Press.Search in Google Scholar
Gemenis, K. and C. van Ham (2014) “Comparing Methods for Estimating Parties’ Positions in Voting Advice Applications,” In: (Garzia, D and S. Marschall, eds.) Matching Voters with Parties and Candidates. Voting Advice Applications in Comparative Perspective. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 33–48.Search in Google Scholar
Germann, M. and F. Mendez (2016) “Dynamic Scale Validation Reloaded,” Quality & Quantity, 50(3):981–1007.10.1007/s11135-015-0186-0Search in Google Scholar
Germann, M., F. Mendez, J. Wheatley and U. Serdült (2015) “Spatial Maps in Voting Advice Applications: The Case for Dynamic Scale Validation,” Acta Politica, 50(2):214–238.10.1057/ap.2014.3Search in Google Scholar
Giebler, H. (2012) “Bringing Methodology (Back) in: Some Remarks on Contemporary Democracy Measurements,” European Political Science, 11(4):509–518.10.1057/eps.2011.47Search in Google Scholar
Hansen, M. E. and N. E. K. Rasmussen (2013) “Does Running for the Same Party Imply Similar Policy Preferences? Evidence from Voting Advice Applications,” Representation, 49(2):189–205.10.1080/00344893.2013.805161Search in Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, R., J. Levine, W. Morgan, and J. Sprague (1999) “Accessibility and the Political Utility of Partisan and Ideological Orientations,” American Journal of Political Science, 43:888–991.10.2307/2991839Search in Google Scholar
Israel, J., S. Marschall and M. Schultze. (2017) “Cognitive Dissonance and the Effects of Voting Advice Applications on Voting Behaviour: Evidence from the European Elections 2014,” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 27(1):56–74.10.1080/17457289.2016.1268142Search in Google Scholar
Key, V. O. (1961) Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Knopf.Search in Google Scholar
Ladner, A. (2016) “Do VAAs Encourage Issue Voting and Promissory Representation? Evidence From the Swiss Smartvote,” Policy & Internet, 8(4):412–430.10.1002/poi3.137Search in Google Scholar
Lau, R. and D. Redlawsk (2001) “Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making,” American Journal of Political Science 45:951–971.10.2307/2669334Search in Google Scholar
Leimgruber, P., D. Hangartner and L. Leemann (2010) “Comparing Candidates and Citizens in the Ideological Space,” Swiss Political Science Review, 16(3):499–531.10.1002/j.1662-6370.2010.tb00439.xSearch in Google Scholar
Mahéo, V. V.-A. (2016) “The Impact of Voting Advice Applications on Electoral Preferences: A Field Experiment in the 2014 Quebec Election,” Policy & Internet, 8(4):391–411.10.1002/poi3.138Search in Google Scholar
McDonald, M. D. and I. Budge (2005) Elections, Parties, Democracy : Conferring the Median Mandate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199286728.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Roßteutscher, S., R. Schmitt-Beck, H. Schoen, B. Weßels, C. Wolf, A. Wagner, H. Giebler and R. Melcher (2016) “European Parliament Election Study 2014, Candidate Survey (GLES)”. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5717 Data file Version 2.0.0, doi:10.4232/1.12443.10.4232/1.12443Search in Google Scholar
Schmitt, H. (2005) “The European Parliament Elections of June 2004: Still Second-order?” West European Politics, 28(3):650–679.10.1080/01402380500085962Search in Google Scholar
Schmitt, H. and E. Teperoglou (2015) “The 2014 European Parliament Elections in Southern Europe: Second-Order or Critical Elections?” South European Society and Politics, 20(3):287–309.10.1080/13608746.2015.1078271Search in Google Scholar
Stavrakakis, Y., I. Andreadis and G. Katsambekis (2017) A New Populism Index at Work: Identifying Populist Candidates and Parties in the Contemporary Greek Context,” European Politics and Society, 18(4):446–464.10.1080/23745118.2016.1261434Search in Google Scholar
Steenbergen, M. R. and G. Marks (2007) “Evaluating Expert Judgments,” European Journal of Political Research, 46(3):347–366.10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00694.xSearch in Google Scholar
Teperoglou, E., A. Freire, I. Andreadis and J. M. Leite Viegas (2014) “Elites’ and Voters’ Attitudes towards Austerity Policies and their Consequences in Greece and Portugal,” South European Society and Politics, 19(4):457–476.10.1080/13608746.2014.983306Search in Google Scholar
Trechsel, A. H. and P. Mair (2011) “When Parties (Also) Position Themselves: An Introduction to the EU Profiler,” Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 8(1):1–20.10.1080/19331681.2011.533533Search in Google Scholar
Tsatsanis, E., A. Freire and Y. Tsirbas (2014) “The Impact of the Economic Crisis on the Ideological Space in Portugal and Greece: A Comparison of Elites and Voters,” South European Society and Politics, 19(4):519–540.10.1080/13608746.2014.983317Search in Google Scholar
Volkens, A., J. Bara, I. Budge, M. D. McDonald and H.-D. Klingemann (Eds.). (2013) Mapping Policy Preferences From Texts: Statistical Solutions for Manifesto Analysts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199640041.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston