Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Statistics, Politics and Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Wagschal, Uwe

See all formats and pricing
More options …

Abstentionism, Voting Advice Applications and Voting Activation

Javier Ramos / Javier Padilla
  • Corresponding author
  • London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Tel.: +34696072218
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Enrique Chueca
Published Online: 2019-06-11 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/spp-2018-0006


Voting Advice Applications (VAAs) have proliferated in the last decade as part of electoral campaigns in Europe. Several studies have linked the usage of the applications to an increase in voting intention, yet the literature on the factors that make people more likely to be influenced by VAAs is not really developed. This paper tries to contribute to this literature by addressing two key questions: first, how non-institutional forms of political participation influence abstentionism among VAA users and second, how VAA encourages voting intention among these politically engaged abstentionists (activation effect). We first examine (a) whether being engaged in non-institutional forms of participation increases the likelihood of a VAA user declaring him/herself to be a voter and (b) whether being engaged in non-institutional forms of political participation has an effect on the probability of becoming a “voter” after filling in the VAA questionnaire. Our results suggest that the VAA “activation effect” nexus exists and it affects a significant percentage of abstentionist. Those users that have participated in non-institutional forms of participation – such as demonstrations or online petitions – are more likely to declare being voters before filling in the VAA. Among the abstentionists, once they answered the set of 30 key questions, a considerable percent (between 14 and 22 percent depending on the threshold used) declared to have the intention to vote (activation effect). The prevailing profile of the activated user is a young man with tertiary education. The motivational reason for voting a party also matter in increasing the probability that an “activation effect” happens. The competency of the party, its ideology, the candidate presented by the party and the users’ self-interest are also good predictors of the “activation effect.”


  • Accornero, G. and P. Ramos Pinto (2015) “‘Mild Mannered’? Protest and Mobilisation in Portugal Under Austerity, 2010–2013,” West European Politics, 38(3):491–515.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Alvarez, R. M., I. Levin, P. Mair and A. Trechsel (2014) “Party Preferences in the Digital Age: The Impact of Voting Advice Applications,” Party Politics, 20(2):227–236.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Andreadis, I. (2014) “Data Quality and Data Cleaning.” In: Matching Voters with Parties and Candidates. Voting Advice Applications in Comparative Perspective, Chapter 6, pp. 79–91.Google Scholar

  • Bauböck, R. (2007) “Why European Citizenship? Normative Approaches to Supranational Union,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8(2):453–488.Google Scholar

  • Belli, R. F., M. W. Traugott, M. Young and K. A. McGonagle (1999) “Reducing Vote Overreporting in Surveys: Social Desirability, Memory Failure, and Source Monitoring,” The Public Opinion Quarterly, 63(1):90–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cammaerts, B., M. Bruter, S. Banaji, S. Harrison and N. Anstead (2016) Youth Participation in Democratic Life: Stories of Hope and Disillusion. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Cedroni, L. (2010) Voting Advice Applications in Europe: a Comparison. Voting Advice Applications in Europe. The State of the Art, ScriptaWeb, Napoli, 247–257.Google Scholar

  • Christensen, H. S. (2011) “Political Activities on the Internet: Slacktivism or Political Participation by Other Means?” First Monday, 16(2).Google Scholar

  • Conroy, M., J. T. Feezell and M. Guerrero (2012) “Facebook and Political Engagement: A Study of Online Political Group Membership and Offline Political Engagement,” Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5):1535–1546.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dalton, R. J. (2008) “Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation,” Political Studies, 56(1):76–98.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • de Zúñiga, H. G., L. Copeland and B. Bimber (2014) “Political Consumerism: Civic Engagement and the Social Media Connection,” New Media and Society, 16(3):488–506.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dinas, E., A. H. Trechsel and K. Vassil (2014) “A Look into the Mirror: Preferences, Representation and Electoral Participation,” Electoral Studies, 36:290–297.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fossen, T. and J. Anderson (2014) “What’s the Point of Voting Advice Applications? Competing Perspectives on Democracy and Citizenship,” Electoral Studies, 36:244–251.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Fuchs, D. and H. D. Klingemann (1995) “Citizens and the State: A Relationship Transformed,” Citizens and the State, 1:419–443.Google Scholar

  • Galais, C. and E. Anduiza (2016) The Slacktivism Crossroad: Causal Relationships Between Online and Offline Political Participation. In Proceedings of World Association for Public Opinion Research (WAPOR) Regional Conference. Barcelona, Spain, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar

  • Garzia, D. and S. Marschall (2012) “Voting Advice Applications Under Review: The State of Research,” International Journal of Electronic Governance, 5(3–4):203–222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Garzia, D. and S. Marschall (2016) “Research on Voting Advice Applications: State of the Art and Future Directions,” Policy and Internet, 8(4):376–390.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Garzia, D., A. De Angelis and J. Pianzola (2014a) “The Impact of Voting Advice Applications on Electoral Participation.” In: Matching Voters with Parties and Candidates, Chapter 8, 105–114.Google Scholar

  • Garzia, D., A. H. Trechsel, K. Vassil and E. Dinas (2014b) Indirect Campaigning: Past, Present and Future of Voting Advice Applications. In The Internet and Democracy in Global Perspective. Cham: Springer, pp. 25–41.Google Scholar

  • Garzia, D., A. H. Trechsel and A. De Angelis (2017) “Voting Advice Applications and Electoral Participation: A Multi-Method Study,” Political Communication, 34(3):424–443.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Gemenis, K. and M. Rosema (2014) “Voting Advice Applications and Electoral Turnout,” Electoral Studies, 36:281–289.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Germann, M. and K. Gemenis (2019) “Getting out the Vote with Voting Advice Applications,” Political Communication, 36(1):149–170.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Germann, M., F. Mendez, J. Wheatley and U. Serdült (2015) “Spatial Maps in Voting Advice Applications: The Case for Dynamic Scale Validation,” Acta Politica, 50(2):214–238.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Hoikkala, T. (2009) “The Diversity of Youth Citizenships in the European Union,” Young, 17(1):5–24.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Inglehart, R. (1990) Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Israel, J., S. Marschall and M. Schultze (2017) “Cognitive Dissonance and the Effects of Voting Advice Applications on Voting Behaviour: Evidence from the European Elections 2014,” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 27(1):56–74.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Kaase, M. and A. Marsh (1979), “Political Action. A Theoretical Perspective.” In: (Barnes, S., M. Kaase, et al., eds.) Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. London: Sage, pp. 27–56.Google Scholar

  • Kestilä-Kekkonen, E. (2009) “Anti-party Sentiment Among Young Adults: Evidence from Fourteen West European Countries,” Young, 17(2):145–165.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Ladner, A. and J. Pianzola (2015) Voting Advice Applications. In: Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Third Edition, IGI Global, pp. 6427–6436.Google Scholar

  • Mahéo, V. A. (2017) “Information Campaigns and (Under) Privileged Citizens: An Experiment on the Differential Effects of a Voting Advice Application,” Political Communication, 34(4):511–529.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Marien, S., M. Hooghe and E. Quintelier (2010) “Inequalities in Non-Institutionalised Forms of Political Participation: A Multi-Level Analysis of 25 Countries,” Political Studies, 58(1):187–213.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marschall, S. and C. K. Schmidt (2008). Preaching to the Converted or Making A Difference? Mobilizing Effects of an Internet Application at the German General Election 2005. In: Non-party Actors in Electoral Politics. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, pp. 259–278.Google Scholar

  • Marschall, S. and D. Garzia (2014) “Voting Advice Applications in a Comparative Perspective: An Introduction.” In: Matching Voters with Parties and Candidates. Voting Advice Applications in Comparative Perspective. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar

  • Mendez, F. (2017) “Modeling Proximity and Directional Decisional Logic: What Can We Learn from Applying Statistical Learning Techniques to VAA-Generated Data?” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 27(1):31–55.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Morozov, E. (2009) “The Brave New World of Slacktivism,” Foreign Policy, 19(5).Google Scholar

  • Norris, P. (2002) Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Norris, P. (2007) “Political Activism: New Challenges, New Opportunities.” In: The Oxford handbook Of Comparative Politics, Chapter 26, 628–652.Google Scholar

  • Ramos, J., J. Padilla and E. Chueca (2017) ICTs and Democratic Deficit in the EU: How VAA Can Help Improve the Democratization of EU Institutions and Practices: The Case Of EU-Vox 2014, European Elections in Spain. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia (pp. 70–77). ACM.Google Scholar

  • Saunders, C. (2014) “Anti-Politics in Action? Measurement Dilemmas in the Study of Unconventional Political Participation,” Political Research Quarterly, 67(3):574–588.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Selb, P. and S. Munzert (2013) “Voter Overrepresentation, Vote Misreporting, and Turnout Bias in Postelection Surveys,” Electoral Studies, 32(1):186–196.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Schultze, M. (2014) “Effects of Voting Advice Applications (vaas) on Political Knowledge About Party Positions,” Policy and Internet, 6(1):46–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schumann, S. and O. Klein (2015) “Substitute or Stepping Stone? Assessing the Impact of Low-Threshold Online Collective Actions on Offline Participation,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3):308–322.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Stolle, D. and M. Hooghe (2011) “Shifting Inequalities: Patterns of Exclusion and Inclusion in Emerging Forms of Political Participation,” European Societies, 13(1):119–142.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Teorell, J., M. Torcal and J. R. Montero (2007) “Chapter 13: Political participation.” Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis, 334.Google Scholar

  • van Camp, K., J. Lefevere and S. Walgrave (2014) “The Content and Formulation of Statements in Voting Advice Applications.” In: Matching Voters with Parties and Candidates. Voting Advice Applications in Comparative Perspective, Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 11–33. ISBN: 9781907301735.Google Scholar

  • van Deth, J. W. (2014) “A Conceptual Map of Political Participation,” Acta Politica, 49(3):349–367.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Verba, S. and N. H. Nie (1972) Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

  • Vissers, S. and D. Stolle (2014) “Spill-over Effects Between Facebook and on/Offline Political Participation? Evidence from a Two-Wave Panel Study,” Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 11(3):259–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Walgrave, S., P. Van Aelst and M. Nuytemans (2008) “‘Do the Vote Test’: The Electoral Effects of a Popular Vote Advice Application at the 2004 Belgian Elections,” Acta Politica, 43(1):50–70.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2019-06-11

Published in Print: 2019-06-26

Citation Information: Statistics, Politics and Policy, Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 55–85, ISSN (Online) 2151-7509, ISSN (Print) 2194-6299, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/spp-2018-0006.

Export Citation

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in