Amateur Statistician (1936) “The Literary Digest Poll: Mr. Franklin’s Mathematical Analysis Evokes Some Criticism,” Letter to the Editor, The New York Times (October 31), 18.Google Scholar
Belli, R. F., M. W. Traugott and M. N. Beckmann (2001) “What Leads to Voting Overreports? Contrasts of Overreporters to Validated Voters and Admitted Nonvoters in the American National Election Studies,” Journal of Official Statistics, 17:479–498.Google Scholar
Berent, M. K., J. A. Krosnick and A. Lupia (2016) “Measuring Voter Registration and Turnout in Surveys: Do Official Government Records Yield More Accurate Assessments?” Public Opinion Quarterly, 80:597–621.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowley, A. L. (1926) “Measurement of the Precision Attained in Sampling,” Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, 22(Supplement to Book I):1–62.Google Scholar
Bryson, M. C. (1976) “The Literary Digest Poll: Making of a Statistical Myth,” The American Statistician, 30:184–185.Google Scholar
Cahalan, D. (1989) “Comment: The Digest Poll Rides Again !” Public Opinion Quarterly, 53:129–133.Google Scholar
Cohn, N. (2016a) “Why the Surprise Over ‘Brexit’? Don’t Blame the Polls,” The New York Times (June 24). Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/25/upshot/why-the-surprise-over-brexit-dont-blame-the-polls.html.
Cohn, N. (2016b) “How One Illinois Man Distorts National Polls,” The New York Times (October 13), p. A18.Google Scholar
Deming, W. E. (1986) Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, F. (1936) “Refiguring the Digest Poll: Returns Otherwise Examined Found to Show Roosevelt Lead,” Letter to the Editor, The New York Times (October 28), 24.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. H., W. N. Hurwitz and W. G. Madow (1953) Sample Survey Methods and Theory (Vol. 1: Methods and Applications). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Harford, T. (2016) “When Forecasters Get it Wrong,” Financial Times (November 26), 45.Google Scholar
Hoeting, J. A., D. Madigan, A. E. Raftery and C. T. Volinsky (1999) “Bayesian Model Averaging: A Tutorial” (with discussion), Statistical Science, 14:382–417.Google Scholar
Laplace, P. (1814) Essai Philosophique sur les Probabilités (no.57), Paris, France: MME VE Courcier, Imprimeur-Libraire pour les Mathématiques, quai des Augustins.Google Scholar
Lauter, D. (2016) “No, One 19-year-old Trump Supporter Probably Isn’t Distorting the Polling Averages All By Himself,” The Los Angeles Times (October 13) [online]. Available at: http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-daybreak-poll-questions-20161013-snap-story.html.
Levy, F. F. (1936) “Forecasting the Election: Method Suggested to Correct the Poll Taken by the Literary Digest,” Letter to the Editor, The New York Times (October 16), 24.Google Scholar
Literary Digest (1928a) “Semi-final Figures in ‘The Digest’s’ Big Poll,” Literary Digest, 99 (October 27):10–12.Google Scholar
Literary Digest (1928b) “Final Returns in ‘The Digest’s’ Presidential Poll,” Literary Digest, 99 (November 3):5–7.Google Scholar
Literary Digest (1932a) “‘Digest’ Poll Scrutinized by an Expert,” Literary Digest, 114 (October 8): 37–39.Google Scholar
Literary Digest (1932b) “Roosevelt Bags 41 States Out of 48,” Literary Digest, 114 (November 5): 8, 9, 44, 46, 47.Google Scholar
Literary Digest (1936a) “‘The Digest’ Presidential Poll is On!” Literary Digest, 122 (August 22): 3–4.Google Scholar
Literary Digest (1936b) “First Votes in ‘Digest’s’ 1936 Poll,” Literary Digest, 122 (September 5): 7–8.Google Scholar
Literary Digest (1936c) “Landon, 1,293,669; Roosevelt, 972,897: Final Returns in ‘The Digest’s’ Poll of Ten Million Voters,” Literary Digest, 122 (October 31):5–6.Google Scholar
Literary Digest (1936d) “What Went Wrong with the Polls?” Literary Digest, 122 (November 14): 7–8.Google Scholar
Little, B. (2016) “Four of History’s Worst Political Predictions,” National Geographic [online] Available at: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/11/presidential-election-predictions-history/.
Lohr, S. (2010) Sampling: Design and Analysis (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
National Council of Public Polls (2017) “Election Results,” Available at: http://www.ncpp.org/?q=node/101.
New York Times (1924) “Contest Accuracy of Digest’s Poll,” The New York Times (October 20), 2.Google Scholar
New York Times (1937) “Literary Digest Bought by Shaws,” The New York Times (June 17), 21.Google Scholar
Neyman, J. (1934) “On the Two Different Aspects of the Representative Method: The Method of Stratified Sampling and the Method of Purposive Selection. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 97:558–625.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parten, M. (1950) Surveys, Polls, and Samples. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Presser, S., M. W. Traugott and S. Traugott (1990) “Vote ‘Over’ Reporting in Surveys: The Records or the Respondents?” ANES Technical Report Series No. nes010157. Available at: http://electionstudies.org/Library/papers/documents/nes010157.pdf.
Robinson, C. (1932) Straw Votes. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Spiegelhalter, D. J. and H. Riesch (2011), “Don’t Know, Can’t Know: Embracing Deeper Uncertainties When Analyzing Risks,” Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369:4730–4750.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sturgis, P., N. Baker, M. Callegaro, S. Fisher, J. Green, W. Jennings, J. Kuha, B. Lauderdale and P. Smith (2016) Report of the Inquiry into the 2015 British General Election Opinion Polls. London: Market Research Society and British Polling Council. Available at: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/3789/1/Report_final_revised.pdf.
Walton Jr., H., C. V. Gray and L. McLemore (2001) “African American Public Opinion and the Pre-Scientific Polls: The Literary Digest Magazine’s Straw-Vote Presidential Polls, 1916–1936,” National Political Science Review, 8:221–243.Google Scholar