Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Statistics, Politics and Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Wagschal, Uwe

Online
ISSN
2151-7509
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Impact of VAAs on (non-Voting) Aspects of Political Participation: Insights from Panel Data Collected During the 2017 German Federal Elections Campaign

Vasilis Manavopoulos
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Communication and Internet Studies, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Vasiliki Triga
  • Department of Communication and Internet Studies, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Stefan Marschall / Lucas Constantin Wurthmann
Published Online: 2019-02-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/spp-2018-0008

Abstract

Thus far, research on the effects of Voting Advice Applications has focused on some aspects of voting behavior, whether, for example, these online tools impact citizens’ likelihood to vote or their voting choices. Relatively under-researched remain questions concerning the relationship between using VAAs and other forms of engagement with politics, such as involvement in electoral campaigns and information seeking about politics and parties. This paper seeks to examine effects in these behaviors associated with VAA-use employing panel data generated during and after the period of the German Bundestag Federal Election in September, 2017. The data from roughly 1120 participants, sampled to be representative of the German internet users, were collected in four waves, 1 month before the election at the earliest and several weeks following at the latest. We find that VAA-use is positively associated with consuming information about politics through other media (e.g. TV) and other election-related information-seeking activities, such as reading party programmes. On the other hand, we find no statistically significant relationship between VAA-use and interpersonal talk about politics or more active engagement with electoral campaigns such as attending party rallies.

This article offers supplementary material which is provided at the end of the article.

References

  • Alvarez, R. M., I. Levin, P. Mair and A. Trechsel (2014) “Party Preferences in the Digital Age: The Impact of Voting Advice Applications,” Party Politics, 20:227–236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barnes, S. H. and M. Kaase (ed.) (1979) Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverley Hills and London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

  • Berger, B. (2009) “Political Theory, Political Science and the end of Civic Engagement,” Perspectives on Politics, 7(2):335–350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bimber, B. (2003) Information and American Democracy: Technology in the Evolution of Political Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bimber, B. and Copeland, L. (2013) “Digital Media and Traditional Political Participation Over Time in the US,” Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 10:125–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blumler, J. G. and M. Gurevitch (2001) “The New Media and Our Political Communication Discontents: Democratizing Cyberspace,” Information, Communication & Society, 4:1–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boulianne, S. (2009) “Does Internet Use Affect Engagement? A Meta-Analysis of Research,” Political Communication, 26:193–211.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boulianne, S. (2011) “Stimulating or Reinforcing Political Interest: Using Panel Data to Examine Reciprocal Effects between News Media and Political Interest,” Political Communication, 28:147–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bowler, S., T. Donovan and J. A. Karp (2007) “Enraged or Engaged? Preferences for Direct Citizen Participation in Affluent Democracies,” Political Research Quarterly, 60:351–362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brady, H. (1999) “Political Participation.” In: Measures of Political Attitudes, San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 737–801.Google Scholar

  • Campbell, S. W. and N. Kwak (2010) “Mobile Communication and Civic Life: Linking Patterns of Use to Civic and Political Engagement,” Journal of Communication, 60:536–555.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Conway, M. (2000) Political Participation in the United States. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar

  • Croissant, Y. and G. Millo (2008) “Panel Data Econometrics in R: The plm Package,” Journal of Statistics Software, 27:1–43.Google Scholar

  • Dahlberg, S., J. Linde and S. Holmberg (2015) “Democratic Discontent in Old and New Democracies: Assessing the Importance of Democratic Input and Governmental Output,” Political Studies, 63:18–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dalton, R. J. (2008) “Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation,” Political Studies, 56:76–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dalton, R. J. and M. P. Wattenberg (eds.) (2002) Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • De Graaf, J. (2010) “The Irresistible rise of Stemwijzer.” In: (Cedroni L. and Garzia, D. eds.) Voting Advice Applications in Europe: The state of the art. Napoli: ScriptaWeb, pp. 35–46.Google Scholar

  • De Rosa, R. (2010) “Cabina-Elettorale.it (Provides Advice to Italian Voters Since 2009).” In: (Cedroni L. and D. Garzia eds.) Voting Advice Applications in Europe: The state of the art. Napoli: ScriptaWeb, pp. 187–212.Google Scholar

  • Dinas, E., A. H. Trechsel and K. Vassil (2014) “A Look into the Mirror: Preferences, Representation and Electoral Participation,” Electoral Studies, 36:290–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dumont, P. and R. Kies (2012) “Smartvote. Lu: Usage and Impact of the First VAA in Luxembourg,” International Journal of Electronic Governance, 5:388–410.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ekman, J. and E. Amnå (2012) “Political Participation and Civic Engagement: Towards a New Typology,” Human Affairs, 22(3):283–300.Google Scholar

  • Enyedi, Z. (2016) “The Influence of Voting Advice Applications on Preferences, Loyalties and Turnout: An Experimental Study,” Political Studies, 64:1000–1015.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eveland Jr, W. P. and D. A. Scheufele (2000) “Connecting News Media Use with Gaps in Knowledge and Participation,” Political Communication, 17:215–237.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eveland Jr, W. P., A. F. Hayes, D. V. Shah and N. Kwak (2005) “Understanding the Relationship between Communication and Political Knowledge: A Model Comparison Approach Using Panel Data,” Political Communication, 22:423–446.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fivaz, J. and G. Nadig (2010) “Impact of Voting Advice Applications (VAAs) on Voter Turnout and their Potential Use for Civic Education,” Policy & Internet, 2:167–200.Google Scholar

  • Garzia, D. (2010) “The Effects of VAAs on Users’ Voting Behaviour: An Overview.” In: (Cedroni L. and D. Garzia eds.) Voting Advice Applications in Europe: The state of the art. Napoli: ScriptaWeb, pp. 13–33.Google Scholar

  • Garzia, D. and S. Marschall (2012) “Voting Advice Applications Under Review: The State of Research,” International Journal of Electronic Governance, 5:203–222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Garzia, D. and S. Marschall (2014) “Voting Advice Applications in a Comparative Perspective: An Introduction.” In: (Garzia D. and S. Marschall eds.) Matching Voters with Parties and Candidates. Voting Advice Applications in a Comparative Perspective. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar

  • Garzia, D., A. De Angelis and J. Pianzola (2014) “The Impact of Voting Advice Applications on Electoral Participation,” In: (Garzia D. and S. Marschall eds.) Matching Voters with Parties and Candidates. Voting Advice Applications in a Comparative Perspective. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 105–114.Google Scholar

  • Garzia, D., A. H. Trechsel and A. De Angelis (2017) “Voting Advice Applications and Electoral Participation: A Multi-Method Study,” Political Communication, 34:424–443.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gemenis, K. and M. Rosema (2014) “Voting advice applications and electoral turnout,” Electoral studies, 36:281–289.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gemenis, K. and C. van Ham (2014) “Comparing Methods for Estimating Parties’ Positions in Voting Advice Applications.” In: (Garzia D. and S. Marschall eds.) Matching Voters with Parties and Candidates. Voting Advice Applications in a Comparative Perspective. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 33–48.Google Scholar

  • Gelman, A. and G. King (1993) “Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable?” British Journal of Political Science, 23:409–451.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Germann, M. and K. Gemenis (2018) “Getting out the Vote with Voting Advice Applications,” Political Communication. DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2018.1526237.Google Scholar

  • Grönlund, K. and H. Milner (2006) “The Determinants of Political Knowledge in Comparative Perspective,” Scandinavian Political Studies, 29:386–406.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Halaby, C. N. (2014) “Panel Models in Sociological Research: Theory into Practice,” Annual Review of Sociology, 3:507–544.Google Scholar

  • Heinsohn, T., J. Israel, S. Marschall and M. Schultze (2016) “Online-Wahlhilfen in Wahlkämpfen,” Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 26:253–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hirzalla, F., L. Van Zoonen and J. de Ridder (2011) “Internet Use and Political Participation: Reflections on the Mobilization/Normalization Controversy,” The Information Society, 27:1–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ho, D. E., K. Imai, G. King and E. A. Stuart (2011) “MatchIt: Nonparametric Preprocessing for Parametric Causal Inference,” Journal of Statistics Software, 42:1–28.Google Scholar

  • Inglehart, R. and C. Welzel (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Iyengar, S. and A. F. Simon (2000) “New Perspectives and Evidence on Political Communication and Campaign Effects,” Annual Review of Psychology, 51:149–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kaase, M. and A. Marsh (1979) “Political Action. A Theoretical Perspective.” In: (Barnes S., M. Kaase, K. R. Allerback, B. Farah, F. Heunks, R. Inglehart, M. K. Jennings, H. D. Klingemann, A. Marsh and Rosenmayr, L. eds.) Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 27–56.Google Scholar

  • Kaid, L. L., M. S. McKinney and J. C. Tedesco (2007) “Introduction: Political Information Efficacy and Young Voters,” The American Behavioral Scientist, 50:1093–1111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kamoen, N., B. Holleman, A. Krouwel, J. Van de Pol and C. De Vreese (2015) “The Effect of Voting Advice Applications on Political Knowledge and Vote Choice,” Irish Political Studies, 30:595–618.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kruikemeier, S., G. Van Noort, R. Vliegenthart and C. H. De Vreese. (2014) “Unraveling the Effects of Active and Passive Forms of Political Internet Use: Does It Affect Citizen’s Political Involvement?” New Media & Society, 16(6):903–920.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ladner, A. (2016) “Do VAAs Encourage Issue Voting and Promissory Representation? Evidence From the Swiss Smartvote,” Policy & Internet, 8:412–430.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ladner, A. and J. Pianzola (2010) “Do Voting Advice Applications have an Effect on Electoral Participation and Voter Turnout? Evidence from the 2007 Swiss Federal Elections.” In: International Conference on Electronic Participation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 211–224.Google Scholar

  • Ladner, A., J. Fivaz and G. Nadig (2009) “Voting Assistance Applications as Tools to Increase Political Participation and Improve Civic Education.” In: (Print M. and H. Milner eds.) Civic Education and Youth Political Participation. Taipei: Sense Publishers, pp. 43–60.Google Scholar

  • Ladner, A., J. Fivaz and J. Pianzola (2012) “Voting Advice Applications and Party Choice: Evidence from Smartvote Users in Switzerland,” International Journal of Electronic Governance, 5:367–387.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Livingstone, S. and T. Markham (2008) “The Contribution of Media Consumption to Civic Participation,” The British Journal of Sociology, 59:351–371.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lupia, A. and M. D. McCubbins (1998) The Democratic Dilemma: Can citizens Learn what they Need to Know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Mahéo, V. A. (2016) “The Impact of Voting Advice Applications on Electoral Preferences: A Field Experiment in the 2014 Quebec Election,” Policy & Internet, 8:391–411.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mahéo, V. A. (2017) “Information Campaigns and (Under) Privileged Citizens: An Experiment on the Differential Effects of a Voting Advice Application,” Political Communication, 34:511–529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mair, P. (2008) “The Challenge to Party Government,” West European Politics, 31:211–234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marschall, S. (2011) “Wahlen, Wähler, Wahl-O-Mat,” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 4:40–46.Google Scholar

  • Marschall, S. (2014) “Profiling Users.” In: (Garzia D. and S. Marschall eds.) Matching Voters with Parties and Candidates. Voting Advice Applications in a Comparative Perspective. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 93–104.Google Scholar

  • Marschall, S. and C. K. Schmidt (2010) “The Impact of Voting Indicators: the Case of the German Wahl-O-Mat.” In: (Cedroni L. and D. Garzia eds.) Voting Advice Applications in Europe: The state of the art. Napoli: ScriptaWeb, pp. 61–86.Google Scholar

  • Marschall, S. and M. Schultze (2012) “Voting Advice Applications and their Effect on Voter Turnout: The Case of the German Wahl–O–Mat,” International Journal of Electronic Governance, 5:349–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McLeod, J. M., D. A. Scheufele and P. Moy (1999) “Community, Communication, and Participation: The Role of Mass Media and Interpersonal Discussion in Local Political Participation,” Political Communication, 16:315–336.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Milbrath, L. W. and M. L. Goel (1977) Political Participation. 2nd ed. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

  • Norris, P. (1996) “Does Television Erode Social Capital? A Reply to Putnam,” Political Science and Politics, 29:473–480.Google Scholar

  • Norris, P. (2012) “‘To them that Hath…’. News Media and Knowledge Gaps,” Zeitschrift für vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 6:71–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • O’Toole, T., M. Lister, D. Marsh, S. Jones and A. McDonagh (2003) “Tuning Out or Left Out? Participation and Non-Participation Among Young People,” Contemporary politics, 9(1):45–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Revelle, W. and M. W. Revelle (2015) “Package ‘psych.’” The Comprehensive R Archive Network.Google Scholar

  • Schultze, M. (2014) “Effects of Voting Advice Applications (vaas) on Political Knowledge about Party Positions,” Policy & Internet, 6:46–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shah, D. V. and D. A. Scheufele (2006) Explicating Opinion Leadership: Nonpolitical Dispositions, Information Consumption, and Civic Participation,” Political Communication, 23:1–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shah, D., N. Kwak and R. L. Holbert (2001) “’Connecting’ and ‘Disconnecting’ with Civic Life: Patterns of Internet use and the Production of Social Capital,” Political Communication, 18:141–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shah, D. V., J. Cho, W. P. Eveland Jr and N. Kwak (2005) “Information and Expression in a Digital Age: Modeling Internet Effects on Civic Participation,” Communication Research, 32:531–565.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Skoric, M. M., Q. Zhu, D. Goh and N. Pang (2016) “Social Media and Citizen Engagement: A Meta-Analytic Review,” New Media and Society, 18:1817–1839.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sotirovic, M. and J. M. McLeod (2001) “Values, Communication Behavior, and Political Participation,” Political Communication, 18:273–301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stokes, G. (2006) “Critical Theories of Deliberative Democracy and the Problem of Citizenship.” In: The Search for Deliberative Democracy in China. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp. 53–73.Google Scholar

  • Teorell, J., M. Torcal and J. R. Montero (2007) “Political Participation: Mapping the Terrain.” In: (van Deth J., J. R. Montero and A. Westholm eds.) Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge, pp. 334–357.Google Scholar

  • Van Aelst, P., J. Strömbäck, T. Aalberg and F. Esser (2017) “Political Communication in a High-Choice Media Environment: A Challenge for Democracy?” ANNALS 41:3–27.Google Scholar

  • Van Biezen, I., P. Mair and T. Poguntke (2012) “Going, Going,… Gone? The Decline of Party Membership in Contemporary Europe”. European Journal of Political Research, 51(1):24–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Deth, J. W. (2001) “Studying Political Participation: Towards a Theory of Everything.” In: Joint Sessions of Workshops of the European Consortium for Political Research, Grenoble, pp. 6–11.Google Scholar

  • Van de Pol, J., B. Holleman, N. Kamoen, A. Krouwel and C. De Vreese (2014) “Beyond Young, Highly Educated Males: A Typology of VAA Users,” Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(4):397–411.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vassil, K. (2011) Role of Self Selection in Estimating the Effects of Voting Advice Applications Empirical Evidence on the basis of Swiss Smartvote Data. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Verba, S. and N. H. Nie (1987) Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Verba, S., N. H. Nie and J. O. Kim (1987) Participation and Political Equality: A Seven-Nation Comparison. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Verba, S., K. L. Schlozman and H. E. Brady (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Walgrave, S., P. Van Aelst and M. Nuytemans (2008) “‘Do the Vote Test’: The Electoral Effects of a Popular Vote Advice Application at the 2004 Belgian Elections,” Acta Politica, 43:50–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wall, M., A. Krouwel and T. Vitiello (2014) “Do Voters Follow the Recommendations of Voter Advice Application Websites? A Study of the Effects of Kieskompas. nl on its Users’ Vote Choices in the 2010 Dutch Legislative Elections,” Party Politics, 20:416–428.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Westle, B., C. Begemann and A. Rütter (2015) “The ‘Wahl-O-Mat’ in the Course of the German Federal Election 2013–Effects of a German VAA on Users’ Election-Relevant Political Knowledge,” ZPol Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 24:389–426.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2019-02-28

Published in Print: 2018-12-19


Funding Source: European Union’s Horizon 2020 NOTRE project

Award identifier / Grant number: 692058

The authors wish to acknowledge the funding of the panel study by the Fritz Thyssen Foundation, Köln & travel funding through the European Union’s Horizon 2020 NOTRE project (H2020-TWINN-2015, Grant Agreement Number: 692058).


Citation Information: Statistics, Politics and Policy, Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 105–134, ISSN (Online) 2151-7509, ISSN (Print) 2194-6299, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/spp-2018-0008.

Export Citation

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Supplementary Article Materials

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in