Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Statistics, Politics and Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Wagschal, Uwe

Online
ISSN
2151-7509
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Oral Questions in the European Parliament: A Network Analysis

Sebastian Jäckle / Thomas Metz
Published Online: 2019-09-19 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/spp-2019-0004

Abstract

Internal working structures within parliaments are notoriously hard to capture. While analyses based on bill co-sponsorship work for the US Congress, this approach is not feasible in many parliamentary systems. Drawing on data from the European Parliament’s legislative term of 2009–2014 this article shows that parliamentary questions can be another option. Members of the European Parliament may demand information from the Council or the Commission through oral questions. We take advantage of the fact that these questions are signed by their authors and construct a social network of members of the Parliament that support each other’s oral questions. This allows investigating how members and their groups and committees cooperate to control both Council and Commission. Our approach helps to map out the internal structure of the party groups and explore which forces shape the global network. We find that cooperation is mostly driven by party group membership with ALDE, Green/EFA, and GUENGL turning out as the most cohesive groups while SD is internally rather loosely connected. The second strongest clustering characteristic is a legislators’ native country.

References

  • Alemán, Eduardo and Ernesto Calvo (2013) “Explaining Policy Ties in Presidential Congresses: A Network Analysis of Bill Initiation Data,” Political Studies, 61(2):356–377.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Bailer, Stefanie (2012) “People’s Voice or Information Pool? The Role of, and Reason for, Parliamentary Questions in the Swiss Parliament.” In: (Martin Shane and Olivier Rozenberg, eds.) He Roles and Functions of Parliamentary Questions. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 44–56.Google Scholar

  • Blidook, Kelly and Matthew Kerby (2012) “Constituency Influence on ‘Constituency Members’: The Adaptability of Roles to Electoral Realities in the Canadian Case.” In: (Martin Shane and Olivier Rozenberg, eds.) The Roles and Functions of Parliamentary Questions. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 69–81.Google Scholar

  • Bratton, Kathleen A. and Stella M. Rouse (2011) “Networks in the Legislative Arena: How Group Dynamics Affect Cosponsorship,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 36(3):423–460.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Briatte, Francois (2015) Legislative Cosponsorship Networks, online: http://f.briatte.org/parlviz/.

  • Burkett, Tracy and John Skvoretz (2005) Political Support Networks Among US Senators: Stability and Change from 1973 to 1990, online: http://www.researchgate.net/profile/John_Skvoretz/publication/228382999_Political_Support_networks_among_US_Senators_Stability_and_Change_from_1973_to_1990/links/09e415064aba206dc2000000.pdf.

  • Campbell, James E. (1982) “Cosponsoring Legislation in the U.S. Congress,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 7(3):415–422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chiru, Mihail and Valentina-Andreea Dimulescu (2011) “Tribunes Versus Experts: An Analysis Of The Romanian MEPs Questions,” CEU Political Science Journal, 6(1):1–21.Google Scholar

  • Christakis, Nicholas A. and James H. Fowler (2013) “Social Contagion Theory. Examining Dynamic Social Networks and Human Behavior,” Statistics in Medicine, 32(4):556–577.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • de Dios, Manuel S. and Matti Wiberg (2012) “Questioning in European Parliaments.” In: (Martin Shane and Olivier Rozenberg, eds.) The Roles and Functions of Parliamentary Questions. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 96–109.Google Scholar

  • Fowler, James H. (2006a) “Connecting the Congress: A Study of Cosponsorship Networks,” Political Analysis, 14(4):456–487.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fowler, James H. (2006b) “Legislative Cosponsorship Networks in the US House and Senate,” Social Networks, 28(4):454–465.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Highton, Benjamin and Michael S. Rocca (2005) “Beyond the Roll-Call Arena: The Determinants of Position Taking in Congress,” Political Research Quarterly, 58(2):303–316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jensen, Christian B., Sven-Oliver Proksch and Jonathan B. Slapin (2013) “Parliamentary Questions, Oversight, and National Opposition Status in the European Parliament,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 38(2):259–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kepplinger, Hans M. (2008) “Kleine Anfragen: Funktionale Analyse einer parlamentarischen Praxis.” In: (Patzelt, Werner J., Sebaldt Martin and Uwe Kranenpohl, eds.) Res publica semper reformanda. Wiesbaden: VS Verlang, pp. 304–319.Google Scholar

  • Kessler, Daniel and Keith Krehbiel (1996) “Dynamics of Cosponsorship,” The American Political Science Review, 90(3):555–566.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kirkland, Justin H. (2011) “The Relational Determinants of Legislative Outcomes: Strong and Weak Ties Between Legislators,” The Journal of Politics, 73:887–898.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kirkland, Justin H. (2013) “Hypothesis Testing for Group Structure in Legislative Networks,” State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 13(2):225–243.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Kirkland, Justin H. (2014) “Chamber Size Effects on the Collaborative Structure of Legislatures,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 39(2):169–198.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Kirkland, Justin H. and Justin H. Gross (2014) “Measurement and Theory in Legislative Networks: The Evolving Topology of Congressional Collaboration,” Social Networks, 36:97–109.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kirkland, Justin H. and R. L. Williams (2014) “Partisanship and Reciprocity in Cross-Chamber Legislative Interactions,” The Journal of Politics, 76:754–769.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Koger, Gregory (2003) “Position Taking and Cosponsorship in the U.S. House,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 28(2):225–246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Martin, Shane (2011) “Parliamentary Questions, the Behaviour of Legislators, and the Function of Legislatures: An Introduction,” The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(3):259–270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Martin, Shane (2013) Parliamentary Questions, Rockefeller College University at Albany. Center for International Development, Comparative Assessment of Parliaments Note, online: http://www.cid.suny.edu/capnotes1/Cap_note_Martin041713.pdf.

  • Masket, Seth E. (2008) “Where You Sit is Where You Stand: The Impact of Seating Proximity on Legislative Cue-Taking,” Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 3(3):301–311.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCubbins, Mathew D. and Thomas Schwartz (1984) “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms,” American Journal of Political Science, 28(1):165–179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mendonca, Israel, Rosa Figueiredo, Vincent Labatut and Philippe Michelon (2015) Relevance of Negative Links in Graph Partitioning: A Case Study Using Votes from the European Parliament, online: http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.04215.

  • Metz, Thomas and Sebastian Jäckle (2016) “Hierarchical, Decentralized, or Something Else? Opposition Networks in the German Bundestag,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 41:2.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2010) Networks. An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chapters 6 (concepts of network analysis) and 7 (measures).Google Scholar

  • Onnela, Jukka-Pekka, Daniel J. Fenn, Stephen Reid, Mason A. Porter, Peter J. Mucha, Mark D. Fricker and Nick S. Jones (2012) “Taxonomies of Networks from Community Structure,” Physical Review E, 036104.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Patterson, Samuel C. (1959) “Patterns of Interpersonal Relations in a State Legislative Group: The Wisconsin Assembly,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 23(1):101–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Patz, Ronny (2014) Information Flows in the Context of EU Policy-Making. Dissertation thesis, Department of Economic and Social Sciences, University of Potsdam, online: https://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/opus4-ubp/frontdoor/index/index/docId/6824.

  • Patz, Ronny (2015) The Committee Structure of the European Parliament Visualized, online: http://polscieu.ideasoneurope.eu/2015/02/25/committee-structure-european-parliament-visualised/.

  • Porter, Mason A., Peter J. Mucha, M. E. J. Newman and Casey M. Warmbrand (2005) “A Network Analysis of Committees in the U.S. House of Representatives,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(20):7057–7062.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Proksch, Sven-Oliver and Jonathan B. Slapin (2011) “Parliamentary Questions and Oversight in the European Union,” European Journal of Political Research, 50(1):53–79.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Rasch, Bjørn E. (2009) “Opposition Parties, Electoral Incentives and the Control of Government Ministers: Parliamentary Questioning in Norway.” In: (Ganghof Steffen, Christoph Hönnige and Christian Stecker, eds.) Parlamente, Agendasetzung und Vetospieler Festschrift für Herbert Döring. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, pp. 199–214.Google Scholar

  • Rasch, Bjørn E. (2011) “Behavioural Consequences of Restrictions on Plenary Access: Parliamentary Questions in the Norwegian Storting,” The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(3):382–393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ringe, Nils, Jennifer N. Victor and Justin H. Gross (2013) “Keeping Your Friends Close and Your Enemies Closer? Information Networks in Legislative Politics,” British Journal of Political Science, 43:601–628.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Russo, Federico (2011) “The Constituency as a Focus of Representation: Studying the Italian Case through the Analysis of Parliamentary Questions,” The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(3):290–301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sarbaugh-Thompson, Marjorie, Lyke Thompson, Charles D. Elder, Meg Comins, Richard C. Elling and John Strate (2006) “Democracy among Strangers: Term Limits’ Effects on Relationships between State Legislators in Michigan,” State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 6(4):384–409.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Siefken, Sven T. (2010) “Parlamentarische Anfragen – Symbolpolitik oder wirksames Kontrollinstrument?,” Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 41(1):18–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tam Cho, Wendy K. and James H. Fowler (2010) “Legislative Success in a Small World: Social Network Analysis and the Dynamics of Congressional Legislation,” The Journal of Politics, 72:124–135.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tichy, Noel M., Michael L. Tushman and Charles Fombrun (1979) The Academy of Management Review, 4(4):507–519.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Santen, Rosa, Luzia Helfer and Peter van Aelst (2015) “When Politics Becomes News: An Analysis of Parliamentary Questions and Press Coverage in Three West European Countries,” Acta Politica, 50(1):45–63.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Victor, Jennifer N. and Nils Ringe (2009) “The Social Utility of Informal Institutions: Caucuses as Networks in the 110th U.S. House of Representatives,” American Politics Research, 37(5):742–766.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Watts, Duncan J. and Steven H. Strogatz (1998) “Collective Dynamics of Small-World Networks,” Nature, 393(6684):440–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wiberg, Matti (1995) “Parliamentary Questioning: Control by Communication?.” In: (Döring Herbert, ed.) Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Frankfurt: Campus, pp. 179–222.Google Scholar

  • Wilson, Rick K. and Cheryl D. Young (1997) “Cosponsorship in the U. S. Congress,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 22(1):25–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zhang, Yan, A. J. Friend, Amanda L. Traud, Mason A. Porter, James H. Fowler and Peter J. Mucha (2008) “Community Structure in Congressional Cosponsorship Networks,” Physica A. Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 387:1705–1712.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2019-09-19


Citation Information: Statistics, Politics and Policy, 20190004, ISSN (Online) 2151-7509, ISSN (Print) 2194-6299, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/spp-2019-0004.

Export Citation

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in