Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Sport Science Review

The Journal of National Institute for Sport Research

3 Issues per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2069-7244
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Perceived Motivational Climate and Team Cohesion in Adolescent Athletes

Thelma Horn
  • Department of Kinesiology and Health, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, USA
/ Megan Byrd
  • Department of Kinesiology and Health, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, USA
/ Eric Martin
  • Department of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
/ Christine Young
  • Department of Kinesiology and Health, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, USA
Published Online: 2012-08-30 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10237-012-0009-3

Perceived Motivational Climate and Team Cohesion in Adolescent Athletes

This study was conducted to determine whether adolescent athletes' perceptions of their team's level and type of cohesion would be related to, or differ as a function of, their perceptions of their team's motivational climate. This hypothesized link was assessed using both group comparison and multivariate correlational analyses. Study participants (N = 351 adolescent athletes) were recruited from sports camps conducted for high school-aged athletes at universities, colleges, and other sport facilities throughout the United States. Athletes completed questionnaires to assess perceived coach-initiated motivational climate (PMCSQ-2) and perceived team cohesion (GEQ). Based on their scores on perceived motivational climate, athletes were divided into four climate type groups: Low Task/Low Ego; Low Task/High Ego; High Task/Low Ego; High Task/High Ego. MANOVA comparisons revealed that athletes in both high task groups (High Task/Low Ego and High Task/High Ego) exhibited higher perceptions of all forms of group cohesion. Canonical correlation analyses verified the primary link between a task-oriented team climate and high levels of group cohesion but also revealed some positive aspects of an ego-oriented climate. The obtained results revealed that a coach-initiated task-oriented climate is most strongly linked to high levels of perceived team cohesion. However, elements of an ego-oriented climate can also be positively associated with high levels of team cohesiveness provided they are accompanied by selected components of a mastery climate.

Keywords: team cohesion; perceived motivational climate; adolescents; coaching behavior; group dynamics

  • Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Balaguer, I., Duda, J. L., Atienza, F. L., & Mayo, C. (2002). Situational and dispositional goals as predictors of perceptions of individual and team improvement, satisfaction and coach ratings among elite female handball teams. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 3, 293-308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boixadós, M., Cruz, J., Torregrosa, M. & Valiente, L. (2004). Relationships among motivational climate, perceived ability, and fair play attitudes in youth. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 16, 301-317.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Callow, N., Smith, M. J., Hardy, L., Arthur, C. A., & Hardy, J. (2009). Measurement of transformational leadership and its relationship with team cohesion and performance level. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 21, 395-412.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carron, A. V. & Brawley, L. R. (2008). Group dynamics in sport and physical activity. In T. S. Horn (ed.), Advances in sport psychology (3rd ed.) (pp. 214-237). Champaign, IL: HKP.Google Scholar

  • Carron, A. V., Eys, M. A., & Martin, L. J. (2012). Cohesion. In G. Tenenbaum, R. C. Eklund, & A. Kamata (eds.), Measurement in sport and exercise psychology (pp. 411-422). Champaign, IL: HKP.Google Scholar

  • Carron, A. V., Hausenblas, H. A. & Eys, M. A. (2005). Group dynamics in sport (3rd ed.). Ontario: Book Crafters.Google Scholar

  • Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 224-266Google Scholar

  • Chelladurai, P. (2007). In G. Tenenbaum & R. C. Eklund (eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (3rd ed.) (pp. 113-135). NY: John Wiley.Google Scholar

  • Chelladurai, P. & Saleh, S. (1980). Dimensions of leader behavior in sports: Development of a leadership style. Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 34-45.Google Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Côté, J. & Gilbert, W. (2009). An integrative definition of coaching effectiveness and expertise. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 4, 307 - 323.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Courville, T. & Thompson, B. (2001). Use of structure coefficients in published multiple regression articles: Beta is not enough. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 229-248.Google Scholar

  • Cumming, S. P., Smoll, F. L., Smith, R. E., & Grossbard, J. R. (2007). Is winning everything? The relative contributions of motivational climate and won-lost percentage in youth sports. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 19, 322-336.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duda, J. L. & Balaguer, I. (2007). Coach-created motivational climate. In S. Jowett & D. Lavallee (eds.), Social psychology in sport (pp. 117-130). Champaign, IL: HKP.Google Scholar

  • Eys, M. A., Schinke, R. J., & Jeffery, S. (2007). Role perceptions in sport groups. In M. Beauchamp & M. Eys (eds.), Group dynamics advances in sport and exercise psychology: Contemporary themes (pp. 99-116). Oxford, Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Gardner, D. E., Shields, D. L. L., Bredemeier, B. J. L., & Bostrom, A. (1996). The relationship between perceived coaching behaviors and team cohesion among baseball and softball players. The Sport Psychologist, 10, 367-381.Google Scholar

  • Gould, D., Flett, R., & Lauer, L. (2012). The relationship between psychosocial developmental and the sports climate experienced by underserved youth. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13, 80-87.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Hardy, J., Eys, M. A., & Carron, A. V. (2005). Exploring the potential disadvantages of high cohesion in sports teams. Small Group Research, 36, 166-187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harwood, C., Spray, C. M., & Keegan, R. (2008). Achievement goal theories in sport. In T. S. Horn (ed.), Advances in sport psychology (3rd ed.) (pp. 157-186). Champaign, IL: HKP.Google Scholar

  • Heuzé, J. P., Sarrazin, P., Masiero, M., Raimbault, N., & Thomas, J. P. (2006). The relationships of perceived motivational climate to cohesion and collective efficacy in elite female teams. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 18, 210-218.Google Scholar

  • Jowett, S. & Chaundy, V. (2004). An investigation into the impact of coach leadership and coach-athlete relationship on group cohesion. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 8, 302-311.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leeson, H. & Fletcher, R. B. (2005). Longitudinal stability of the Group Environment Questionnaire with elite female athletes. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 9, 147-160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Magyar, T. M., Feltz, D. L., & Simpson, I. P. (2004). Individual and crew level determinants of collective efficacy in rowing. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26, 136-153.Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of Golden Rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320-341.Google Scholar

  • Murray, N. P. (2006). The differential effect of team cohesion and leadership behavior in high school sports. Individual Differences Research, 4, 216-225.Google Scholar

  • Newton, M., Duda, J. L., & Yin, Z. (2000). Examination of the psychometric properties of the Perceived Motivational Climate in Sport Questionnaire-2 in a sample of female athletes. Journal of Sports Sciences, 18, 275-290.Google Scholar

  • Nicholls, J. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.), NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

  • Olympiou, A., Jowett, S., & Duda, J. L. (2008). The psychological interface between the coach-created motivational climate and the coach-athlete relationship in team sports. The Sport Psychologist, 22, 423-438.Google Scholar

  • Ommundsen, Y., Roberts, G. C., Lemyre, P. N., & Treasure, D. (2003). Perceived motivational climate in male youth soccer: Relations to social-moral functioning, sportspersonship and team norm perceptions. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4, 397-413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ommundsen, Y., Roberts, G. C., Lemyre, P. N., & Miller, B. W., (2005). Peer relationships in adolescent competitive soccer: Associations to perceived motivational climate, achievement goals and perfectionism. Journal of Sports Science, 23, 977-989.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pedhazur, E. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research. NY: Holt.Google Scholar

  • Raykov, T. (2008). Alpha if item deleted: A note on loss of criterion validity in scale development if maximizing coefficient alpha. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 275-285.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Rovio, E., Eskola, J., Kozub, S. A., Duda, J. L., & Lintunen, T. (2009). Can high group cohesion be harmful? A case study of a junior ice-hockey team. Small Group Research, 40, 421-435.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Russell, D. W. (2002). In search of underlying dimensions: The use (and abuse) of factor analysis in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1629-1646.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Senécal, J., Loughead, T. M., & Bloom, G. A. (2008). A season-long team-building intervention: Examining the effect of team goal-setting on cohesion. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30, 186-199.Google Scholar

  • Sherry, A. & Henson, R. K. (2005). Conducting and interpreting canonical correlation analysis in personality research: A user-friendly primer. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 37-48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach's alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 107-120.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spink, K. S., Wilson, K. S., & Odnokon, P. (2010). Examining the relationship between cohesion and return to team in elite athletes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11, 6-11.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar

  • Turman, P. D. (2003). Coaches and cohesion: The impact of coaching techniques on team cohesion in the small group sport setting. Journal of Sport Behavior, 26, 86-104.Google Scholar

  • Turman, P. D. (2008). Coaches' immediacy behaviors as predictors of athletes' perceptions of satisfaction and team cohesion. Western Journal of Communication, 72, 162-179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article


Published Online: 2012-08-30

Published in Print: 2012-08-01


Citation Information: Sport Science Review, ISSN (Online) 2069-7244, ISSN (Print) 2066-8732, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10237-012-0009-3.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in