Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter (A) December 4, 2009

Morphological non-blocking in Dutch plural allomorphy: a contrastive approach

  • Sebastian Kürschner

Abstract

Dutch simplex nouns ending in schwa have two regular plural forms, e.g. bode-s/bode-n ‘messengers’. This means that neither of the two allomorphs -s and -n is blocked. Such regular non-blocking is non-existent in the closely related languages German and Afrikaans. To identify the reasons for this divergence, the history of plural marking in the three languages is compared. Based on the historical observations it is argued that the doublets in Dutch are retained due to the output principle of plurals ending in a trochaic foot, according to which both -s and -n may apply without preference on stems with non-final stress.

Published Online: 2009-12-04
Published in Print: 2009-10

© by Akademie Verlag, Berlin, Germany

Downloaded on 29.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1524/stuf.2009.0022/html
Scroll to top button